Forced Induction Custom FI Setup Questions

Piping size upstream of the turbo?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-31-2007, 11:46 PM
  #1  
0.0 BAR
Thread Starter
 
DILYSI Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 9
Default Piping size upstream of the turbo?

My turbo (DSM T25) has a 2" inlet. I would like to run 2" intake piping and a 2" cone filter unless there is a reason to up-size it and then reduce it right at the turbo. Thoughts? Opinions? Wild *** guesses?
DILYSI Dave is offline  
Old 05-31-2007, 11:48 PM
  #2  
1.0 BAR
 
RandysSOHC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 442
Default Re: Piping size upstream of the turbo?

well,I would only run 4" piping on that turbo,
spool time will be great!

you'll regret it running 2" piping.
probably wont even spool
RandysSOHC is offline  
Old 06-01-2007, 12:14 AM
  #3  
0.5 BAR
 
86crxZ6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 187
Default Re: Piping size upstream of the turbo?

Originally Posted by RandysSOHC
well,I would only run 4" piping on that turbo,
spool time will be great!

you'll regret it running 2" piping.
probably wont even spool
im sure itll spool but not as fast
86crxZ6 is offline  
Old 06-01-2007, 01:13 AM
  #4  
1.0 BAR
 
dcg9381's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 326
Default Re: Piping size upstream of the turbo?

Lets think about this. I have two pieces of equipment:
1) a 4" diameter garden hose with a 2" outlet.
2) a 2" garden hose with a 2" outlet.

Which flows more water?
dcg9381 is offline  
Old 06-01-2007, 09:58 AM
  #5  
0.0 BAR
Thread Starter
 
DILYSI Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 9
Default Re: Piping size upstream of the turbo?

Originally Posted by dcg9381
Lets think about this. I have two pieces of equipment:
1) a 4" diameter garden hose with a 2" outlet.
2) a 2" garden hose with a 2" outlet.

Which flows more water?
Well that's the question, isn't it. My gut feeling is they flow the same in steady state, but that the 4" might have slightly better dynamic response since the 2" reduction would have a ready supply of fluid behind it. On the other hand, the reduction could introduce turbulance, which would not be present with a 2" intake track the entire length.
DILYSI Dave is offline  
Old 06-01-2007, 01:46 PM
  #6  
3.0 BAR
 
E-b0la's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,967
Default Re: Piping size upstream of the turbo?

Your thinking about it too hard. It's a DSM t-25. Just get a 2 to a 2.5 coupler and put a 2.5 cone air filter on it. Done.

If you want to think of it in terms of flow and ----. If you have a bigger pipe then you'll have a bigger filter. A bigger filter will have more surface area on it which lets air flow through it better than a small filter. The piping size really won't do much in terms of performance.
E-b0la is offline  
Old 06-01-2007, 02:27 PM
  #7  
WTF
3.0 BAR
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,057
Default Re: Piping size upstream of the turbo?

i used stock dsm charge hose rigged to stock civic intake tube before and it worked as good as 2.5" hard pipes.

o wait you mean as the intake huh
WTF is offline  
Old 06-01-2007, 05:08 PM
  #8  
3.0 BAR
 
bigdaddyvtec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,631
Default Re: Piping size upstream of the turbo?

Post **** you noob dipshit and the answer will magically come to you... Right in your eye
bigdaddyvtec is offline  
Old 06-02-2007, 12:31 AM
  #9  
3.0 BAR
 
bitchasscracker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,890
Default Re: Piping size upstream of the turbo?

i always use 2 inch piping more than adequate
bitchasscracker is offline  
Old 06-04-2007, 01:23 PM
  #10  
1.5 BAR
 
HiProfile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 723
Default Re: Piping size upstream of the turbo?

Many people go bigger because you can't find many filters that are 7" in diameter with a 2" coupler. I'd go with a 2.5" and a silicone reducer. Or a new turbo, t25's are rediculous on a 2.0L.
HiProfile is offline  


Quick Reply: Piping size upstream of the turbo?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:09 AM.