Forced Induction Custom FI Setup Questions

New motor meets the twin turbos pic

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-25-2005, 04:13 PM
  #21  
1.0 BAR
 
nitrofish420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 230
Default Re: New motor meets the twin turbos pic

That'll ------ rock, man. Stick it to the imports!!

:thinks to self:

Oh wait, I AM one of the imports now... Well, kick some *** anyway1
nitrofish420 is offline  
Old 07-25-2005, 06:33 PM
  #22  
1.5 BAR
 
linkmustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,380
Default Re: New motor meets the twin turbos pic

nice u still useing the fmu and hows that working
linkmustang is offline  
Old 07-25-2005, 06:51 PM
  #23  
1.5 BAR
 
shanerv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,068
Default Re: New motor meets the twin turbos pic

very nice, that looks SICK!, definately keep us posted with recent pics.
shanerv is offline  
Old 07-26-2005, 11:30 AM
  #24  
1.0 BAR
Thread Starter
 
Erich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 258
Default Re: New motor meets the twin turbos pic

Regular running wise, the fmu setup works very well. Idles like a stocker. Really smooth application of power.
But......
I don't know how safe the tune is with that fmu. Once this motor/turbo setup is done and broken in it is going to the dyno with a wideband. No way am I going to toast this new motor because of a cut rate fuel system. I don't really like the way the fmu responded so far but I still want to mess with it. When you start into boost, the fuel pressure would not change much and then all of a sudden it would spike up. I would much rather see a more linear response.
Erich
Erich is offline  
Old 07-26-2005, 01:11 PM
  #25  
1.5 BAR
 
linkmustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,380
Default Re: New motor meets the twin turbos pic

ya i see what your saying what ar are the turbos
linkmustang is offline  
Old 07-26-2005, 01:18 PM
  #26  
3.0 BAR
 
bitchasscracker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,890
Default Re: New motor meets the twin turbos pic

dont the gt40 heads raise the compression
bitchasscracker is offline  
Old 07-26-2005, 04:50 PM
  #27  
1.0 BAR
Thread Starter
 
Erich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 258
Default Re: New motor meets the twin turbos pic

The pistons are not stock either. The combo of the GT40P heads and these pistons is supposed to yield about 9.2:1 compression. So it is higher but not out of sight. The alternative with the dished probe pistons was like 8:1 or even lower (I forget exactly). Given the limitations of these turbos, 12 psi is what I calculate to be the max boost I can practically run and still be efficient so having the higher compression pistons seems to me to be a better idea. Hope I'm right.
Erich
Erich is offline  
Old 07-26-2005, 06:39 PM
  #28  
1.5 BAR
 
linkmustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,380
Default Re: New motor meets the twin turbos pic

should be fine will it be your daily driver
linkmustang is offline  
Old 07-27-2005, 06:17 AM
  #29  
0.0 BAR
 
Tom-Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 0
Default Re: New motor meets the twin turbos pic

Originally Posted by Erich
The pistons are not stock either. The combo of the GT40P heads and these pistons is supposed to yield about 9.2:1 compression. So it is higher but not out of sight. The alternative with the dished probe pistons was like 8:1 or even lower (I forget exactly). Given the limitations of these turbos, 12 psi is what I calculate to be the max boost I can practically run and still be efficient so having the higher compression pistons seems to me to be a better idea. Hope I'm right.
Erich
You are limited in a forced induction application by your compressor - static CR does nothing for you.
Tom-Guy is offline  
Old 07-27-2005, 02:10 PM
  #30  
0.0 BAR
 
J-SMITH69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Default Re: New motor meets the twin turbos pic

Originally Posted by Joseph Davis
Originally Posted by Erich
The pistons are not stock either. The combo of the GT40P heads and these pistons is supposed to yield about 9.2:1 compression. So it is higher but not out of sight. The alternative with the dished probe pistons was like 8:1 or even lower (I forget exactly). Given the limitations of these turbos, 12 psi is what I calculate to be the max boost I can practically run and still be efficient so having the higher compression pistons seems to me to be a better idea. Hope I'm right.
Erich
You are limited in a forced induction application by your compressor - static CR does nothing for you.
...?
J-SMITH69 is offline  


Quick Reply: New motor meets the twin turbos pic



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:26 AM.