intercooler or no intercooler?
11-19-2003, 04:24 PM
#1
0.0 BAR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 5
intercooler or no intercooler?
i'm wondering if i should go through the hassle of even running an intercooler on my car. i'm only planning on running 7psi on a twin 9b turboed v6. its got 10-1 compression if that will factor into my decision, let me know what you guys think. thanks
11-19-2003, 04:57 PM
#3
0.0 BAR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 5
Re:intercooler or no intercooler?
i was just seeing if itd be necessary to intercool it, i've heard people say under 10psi an intercooler isn't that necerssary, i'm just trying to simplify the install and save a little money while i'm at it. let me know the pros and cons. thanks
11-19-2003, 05:54 PM
#5
1.5 BAR
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 763
Re:intercooler or no intercooler?
hmmmmmmmmmm, I think whoever told you running a 10 pound setup w/o an intercooler was safe is lying to you. I would not go over 5 pounds without an intercooler. But thats just me. Besides, you will not see huge numbers unless you intercool it. The whole point is to make the air dense. HOT AIR ISNT DENSE.
11-19-2003, 06:52 PM
#7
1.0 BAR
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 326
Re:intercooler or no intercooler?
Quick answer, always intercool, cooler aiur is more dense-->more air==more power.
Long answer, it is possible to hurt performance by putting on an intercooler, it takes power to pass all that air through those little tubes. if this is offset by the density change you will loose power. In practice this only happens, on very poorly designed setups.
If you can afford it, get an intercooler. Why say no to less detonation and higher charge density.
Long answer, it is possible to hurt performance by putting on an intercooler, it takes power to pass all that air through those little tubes. if this is offset by the density change you will loose power. In practice this only happens, on very poorly designed setups.
If you can afford it, get an intercooler. Why say no to less detonation and higher charge density.
11-20-2003, 03:19 AM
#8
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 46
Re:intercooler or no intercooler?
Originally Posted by 88b16civic
Quick answer, always intercool, cooler aiur is more dense-->more air==more power.
Long answer, it is possible to hurt performance by putting on an intercooler, it takes power to pass all that air through those little tubes. if this is offset by the density change you will loose power. In practice this only happens, on very poorly designed setups.
If you can afford it, get an intercooler. Why say no to less detonation and higher charge density.
Long answer, it is possible to hurt performance by putting on an intercooler, it takes power to pass all that air through those little tubes. if this is offset by the density change you will loose power. In practice this only happens, on very poorly designed setups.
If you can afford it, get an intercooler. Why say no to less detonation and higher charge density.
the highest i would go on a honda would be 6 psi. as for anything else, i guess you just have to experiment!
13psi no intercooler and 89 octane gas with a 9.3:1 compresion ratio. no ping either. oh and i make 210whp with ease. go figure.
