Help me find a Grand National Turbo!
Yeah, this GN was my grandmothers car. Its sitting in the shed behind my house right now, with around 22,000 miles on it. I think we last were offered $29,000 for it as is.
I am pretty sure that the exhaust is cracked, and that the turbo is warped. As far as I know, yes this car did not have a blow off, but it also has a different intake stream then any other 'modern' turbo vehicle. I'll have to take pics when its cool enough to take it out.
I am pretty sure that the exhaust is cracked, and that the turbo is warped. As far as I know, yes this car did not have a blow off, but it also has a different intake stream then any other 'modern' turbo vehicle. I'll have to take pics when its cool enough to take it out.
My friends car was bought with 27K miles and the orignal tires and air filter were still on it.
He paid $12K for it, but he said I was really worth about $18-19K, but close to $30K sounds like what a GNX might go for ( BTW the GNX was the fastest prodution car in 1987 and that includes ALL ferris and porches ).
GM also built the fastest prodution truck ever built too ( including the lightning ). The 92' GMC Syclone S-10. It ran "13.00" from the factory and waxed the **** outta the vette back then and tuned it could wax a ZR-1, which was $60K vs $27K syclone.
Both cars were killed b/c they were effecting vette sales ( unlike the newer F-bodies which weren't selling to well ).
Score = vette 2, turbo V6's 0.. That's why I hate vettes, rich wennier cars, are the reason that GM is getting its *** stomped by 4 bangers now..
www.turbobuicks.com
www.turbibuick.com ( the "s" at the end makes a difference ).
He paid $12K for it, but he said I was really worth about $18-19K, but close to $30K sounds like what a GNX might go for ( BTW the GNX was the fastest prodution car in 1987 and that includes ALL ferris and porches ).
GM also built the fastest prodution truck ever built too ( including the lightning ). The 92' GMC Syclone S-10. It ran "13.00" from the factory and waxed the **** outta the vette back then and tuned it could wax a ZR-1, which was $60K vs $27K syclone.
Both cars were killed b/c they were effecting vette sales ( unlike the newer F-bodies which weren't selling to well ).
Score = vette 2, turbo V6's 0.. That's why I hate vettes, rich wennier cars, are the reason that GM is getting its *** stomped by 4 bangers now..
www.turbobuicks.com
www.turbibuick.com ( the "s" at the end makes a difference ).
HAve you seen this INSANE smokes the tires on the Dyno http://www.fasttrackperformance.com/.../ChrisTTGN.wmv
1076 hp
1076 hp
Originally Posted by 89dxhunchback
My friends car was bought with 27K miles and the orignal tires and air filter were still on it.
He paid $12K for it, but he said I was really worth about $18-19K, but close to $30K sounds like what a GNX might go for ( BTW the GNX was the fastest prodution car in 1987 and that includes ALL ferris and porches ).
GM also built the fastest prodution truck ever built too ( including the lightning ). The 92' GMC Syclone S-10. It ran "13.00" from the factory and waxed the **** outta the vette back then and tuned it could wax a ZR-1, which was $60K vs $27K syclone.
Both cars were killed b/c they were effecting vette sales ( unlike the newer F-bodies which weren't selling to well ).
Score = vette 2, turbo V6's 0.. That's why I hate vettes, rich wennier cars, are the reason that GM is getting its *** stomped by 4 bangers now..
www.turbobuicks.com
www.turbibuick.com ( the "s" at the end makes a difference ).
He paid $12K for it, but he said I was really worth about $18-19K, but close to $30K sounds like what a GNX might go for ( BTW the GNX was the fastest prodution car in 1987 and that includes ALL ferris and porches ).
GM also built the fastest prodution truck ever built too ( including the lightning ). The 92' GMC Syclone S-10. It ran "13.00" from the factory and waxed the **** outta the vette back then and tuned it could wax a ZR-1, which was $60K vs $27K syclone.
Both cars were killed b/c they were effecting vette sales ( unlike the newer F-bodies which weren't selling to well ).
Score = vette 2, turbo V6's 0.. That's why I hate vettes, rich wennier cars, are the reason that GM is getting its *** stomped by 4 bangers now..
www.turbobuicks.com
www.turbibuick.com ( the "s" at the end makes a difference ).
Keep in mind the older vipers only ran 12.80... A truck with no rear-end weight is going to be VERY hard to hook-up.
slicks will make it a different story.
BTW, how much is this V-10 beast going to cost ? $45K ??
a syclone with VERY light mods could run low 12's, high 11's, but the RAm V-10 could also handle a 200shot, so...
Time claims are gay... Check out the times that street bike magizines publish.. all the 600's are supposed to run 10.8-10.9 and the bigger ones are in the high 9's, but 99/100 people can only get them to run mid-high 11's for the 600's, and mid-high 10's for the 1000s.. The same goes for SRT neons, viper, Z06, cobra S/C mustang, and a lot of other cars that claim very low times.
Motor trend says the neon runs 13.9, but I've seen 3 different ones run and the fastest was a 14.3, and the other were HIGH HIGH 14's..
When i see a SRT ram run 12.50 at the track in stock form, thats when I give props.
Still dodge has grown some big *****, they should knock GMs lazy ***'s out... GM used to be good, but now, all they wanna do is S/C saturns and cavilers ( no offence meant ). Where's the Turbo camaro
heh, right, we get a bitch *** GTO.
The caviler in Aust. is a 6-speed, 240whp, turbo, awd !!!
slicks will make it a different story.
BTW, how much is this V-10 beast going to cost ? $45K ??
a syclone with VERY light mods could run low 12's, high 11's, but the RAm V-10 could also handle a 200shot, so...
Time claims are gay... Check out the times that street bike magizines publish.. all the 600's are supposed to run 10.8-10.9 and the bigger ones are in the high 9's, but 99/100 people can only get them to run mid-high 11's for the 600's, and mid-high 10's for the 1000s.. The same goes for SRT neons, viper, Z06, cobra S/C mustang, and a lot of other cars that claim very low times.
Motor trend says the neon runs 13.9, but I've seen 3 different ones run and the fastest was a 14.3, and the other were HIGH HIGH 14's..
When i see a SRT ram run 12.50 at the track in stock form, thats when I give props.
Still dodge has grown some big *****, they should knock GMs lazy ***'s out... GM used to be good, but now, all they wanna do is S/C saturns and cavilers ( no offence meant ). Where's the Turbo camaro
heh, right, we get a bitch *** GTO.The caviler in Aust. is a 6-speed, 240whp, turbo, awd !!!
I know, just saying... the STi and the EVO8 and the SRT neon ( with slicks ) could all stomp a mud hole in the vettes ***, and GM is just bending over and taking it.
An all alum. 427 sounds good, but so does a BJ from Pamila Anderson.... Both will never happen.
An all alum. 427 sounds good, but so does a BJ from Pamila Anderson.... Both will never happen.
Originally Posted by 89dxhunchback
Keep in mind the older vipers only ran 12.80... A truck with no rear-end weight is going to be VERY hard to hook-up.
slicks will make it a different story.
BTW, how much is this V-10 beast going to cost ? $45K ??
a syclone with VERY light mods could run low 12's, high 11's, but the RAm V-10 could also handle a 200shot, so...
Time claims are gay... Check out the times that street bike magizines publish.. all the 600's are supposed to run 10.8-10.9 and the bigger ones are in the high 9's, but 99/100 people can only get them to run mid-high 11's for the 600's, and mid-high 10's for the 1000s.. The same goes for SRT neons, viper, Z06, cobra S/C mustang, and a lot of other cars that claim very low times.
Motor trend says the neon runs 13.9, but I've seen 3 different ones run and the fastest was a 14.3, and the other were HIGH HIGH 14's..
When i see a SRT ram run 12.50 at the track in stock form, thats when I give props.
Still dodge has grown some big *****, they should knock GMs lazy ***'s out... GM used to be good, but now, all they wanna do is S/C saturns and cavilers ( no offence meant ). Where's the Turbo camaro
heh, right, we get a bitch *** GTO.
The caviler in Aust. is a 6-speed, 240whp, turbo, awd !!!
slicks will make it a different story.
BTW, how much is this V-10 beast going to cost ? $45K ??
a syclone with VERY light mods could run low 12's, high 11's, but the RAm V-10 could also handle a 200shot, so...
Time claims are gay... Check out the times that street bike magizines publish.. all the 600's are supposed to run 10.8-10.9 and the bigger ones are in the high 9's, but 99/100 people can only get them to run mid-high 11's for the 600's, and mid-high 10's for the 1000s.. The same goes for SRT neons, viper, Z06, cobra S/C mustang, and a lot of other cars that claim very low times.
Motor trend says the neon runs 13.9, but I've seen 3 different ones run and the fastest was a 14.3, and the other were HIGH HIGH 14's..
When i see a SRT ram run 12.50 at the track in stock form, thats when I give props.
Still dodge has grown some big *****, they should knock GMs lazy ***'s out... GM used to be good, but now, all they wanna do is S/C saturns and cavilers ( no offence meant ). Where's the Turbo camaro
heh, right, we get a bitch *** GTO.The caviler in Aust. is a 6-speed, 240whp, turbo, awd !!!
I happen to have a turbo neon rt that runs faster than 14.50 with no intercooler and 6psi.
I was just sayin' the SRT-10 was cool as well as the bike that dodge put a Viper Motor on. YEAH! i am gonna get on that
.anyway while we are on the subject - a custom fabricator in the neon community has already replaced the tiny little turbo on the SRT-4 with a T3/T4 and put nitrous on it too! Dyno results to follow. they expect 11's without the nitrous and it still costs less than an evo 8 or a wrx sti.
http://www.neons.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=113508
well, this is HMT
I don't have a problem with neons, but I seriously don't show them any respect. I mean honda could have built the s2000 with a turbo.. or if they were crazy, they could have built a crx with h22 turbo and call it a 12.00 sec car from the factory.
I don't have a problem with neons, but I seriously don't show them any respect. I mean honda could have built the s2000 with a turbo.. or if they were crazy, they could have built a crx with h22 turbo and call it a 12.00 sec car from the factory.
I know, just saying... the STi and the EVO8 and the SRT neon ( with slicks ) could all stomp a mud hole in the vettes ***, and GM is just bending over and taking it.
An all alum. 427 sounds good, but so does a BJ from Pamila Anderson.... Both will never happen.
An all alum. 427 sounds good, but so does a BJ from Pamila Anderson.... Both will never happen.
neon srt4
215@5400
245@3200
29 / 36
1/4 Mile 14.10 sec
evo8
271@6500
273@3500
18 / 26
1/4 Mile 14.20 sec
vette (coupe)
350@5200
360@4000
18 / 25
0-60 4.80 sec
1/4 Mile 13.02 sec <--- (motortrend)
vette (z06)
405@6000
400@4800
19 / 28
1/4 Mile 13.10 sec
all the 1/4 times are from car and driver. except the coupe vette


