FJO vs PLX wideband o2 sensors

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

05-07-2004, 04:33 PM

#11

racerxfear

1.0 BAR

Join Date: Jan 2004

Posts: 273

Re:FJO vs PLX *wideband o2 sensors*

Quote:

Originally Posted by scarecrowX

if you have a lap top to do your datalogging on, the zeitronix might be your best bet.

http://www.zeitronix.com/Products/zt2/zt2.htm

$279 gets you everything you need, minus a display. this is probably the route i'll be going, as i won't have to buy an extra cable to datalog stuff like MAP, rpm, tps, etc. like you do with the LM-1.

dang, i wish i would have known about this product earlier before i ordered the plx m-300. for the price of the plx m300 i could have been datalogging everything on my shitty laptop. I like my m300. Maybe i'll try selling it and going with this product

05-10-2004, 03:40 AM

#12

terdbird

0.5 BAR

Join Date: Apr 2004

Posts: 174

Re:FJO vs PLX *wideband o2 sensors*

is it possible to buy a wideband o2 sensor, then just hook up and autometer or some other kind of guage to it? would it be more/less acurate than using your stock narrow band?

05-10-2004, 04:14 AM

#13

beerbongskickass

0.0 BAR

Join Date: Dec 2002

Posts: 0

Re:FJO vs PLX *wideband o2 sensors*

Quote:

Originally Posted by terdbird

is it possible to buy a wideband o2 sensor, then just hook up and autometer or some other kind of guage to it? would it be more/less acurate than using your stock narrow band?

http://www.plxdevices.com/NB_WB_GaugeConv.htm

05-11-2004, 08:37 AM

#14

neil85ae86

0.5 BAR

Join Date: May 2003

Posts: 152

Re:FJO vs PLX *wideband o2 sensors*

Just read a thread on the megasquirt forum on the LM1, apparently the heating circuit for the sensor is a bit flakey, and the sensor will overheat if it's mounted too close to the turbine housing/mani, so if you do get one make sure you mount it as far away as possible, but before the cat.

Neil