FJO vs PLX *wideband o2 sensors*
05-02-2004, 07:58 PM
#1
0.0 BAR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 3
FJO vs PLX *wideband o2 sensors*
I just want your input on each one.
Which would you choose since PLX is $200 cheaper then the FJO
Any input would be good.
If you had a choice which would you choose and WHY would you choose that system
Also people with first hand experience would be nice to hear your input on these devices
ANY INFO would be good.
Which would you choose since PLX is $200 cheaper then the FJO
Any input would be good.
If you had a choice which would you choose and WHY would you choose that system
Also people with first hand experience would be nice to hear your input on these devices
ANY INFO would be good.
05-05-2004, 03:22 AM
#8
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 13,991
Re:FJO vs PLX *wideband o2 sensors*
Originally Posted by GimpyCivic
I owned an LM-1 for 4 days, the backlit LCD is homo... and its an awkward unit in general. I sold it and bought a PLX M-500, wouldnt go back for a million bucks.
05-06-2004, 11:48 AM
#10
0.5 BAR
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 188
Re:FJO vs PLX *wideband o2 sensors*
if you have a lap top to do your datalogging on, the zeitronix might be your best bet.
http://www.zeitronix.com/Products/zt2/zt2.htm
$279 gets you everything you need, minus a display. this is probably the route i'll be going, as i won't have to buy an extra cable to datalog stuff like MAP, rpm, tps, etc. like you do with the LM-1.
http://www.zeitronix.com/Products/zt2/zt2.htm
$279 gets you everything you need, minus a display. this is probably the route i'll be going, as i won't have to buy an extra cable to datalog stuff like MAP, rpm, tps, etc. like you do with the LM-1.
