Anti Lag
03-08-2007, 06:27 AM
#54
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 0
Re: Anti Lag
Originally Posted by drifto
---- use a d16 crank for all i care as long as some loses there grey matter it dont matter
Originally Posted by drifto
(ps) i have a b16a in my crx and its just fine
03-08-2007, 09:32 AM
#55
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,330
Re: Anti Lag
Originally Posted by Shizuma
anyway, what do you think of the cutting spark option that was mentioned up there? It sounds plausible, the only thing I'm kind of iffy about is maybe fouling the plugs...what do you think?
Originally Posted by Joseph Davis
I think we should pit our roomates in a battle to the death, charge admission, and then rake in money on side bets. What do you think?
vs
We can also schedule a fight between you and I, where we try to brain each other with camshafts; I get a set of SR20 bumpsticks, you have to wield 4G63 cams.
vs
We can also schedule a fight between you and I, where we try to brain each other with camshafts; I get a set of SR20 bumpsticks, you have to wield 4G63 cams.
As far as the camshaft battle? Ill do it as long as I get to use EVO cams, they're hollow and I can swing em faster....
All the proceeds can go to the finish-my---------integra fund.
Originally Posted by Joseph Davis
I can do that, I like D16s.
Care to race for money?
Care to race for money?
03-08-2007, 12:25 PM
#56
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 0
Re: Anti Lag
buks about to pick up an st165 on the mad cheep 
, maybe.
and yeah, ALS blows ---- up from constant inconsistant explosions in the manifold, presurized air forced into the mani, mad retarded timing to let you spew fuel out of hte exhaust ports. Although it depends on how strong you set the ALS to be, I was reading up on this a few days ago and some of them dump so much fuel and air into the mani they boost 1.5-2 BAR with the throttle closed!
, maybe.and yeah, ALS blows ---- up from constant inconsistant explosions in the manifold, presurized air forced into the mani, mad retarded timing to let you spew fuel out of hte exhaust ports. Although it depends on how strong you set the ALS to be, I was reading up on this a few days ago and some of them dump so much fuel and air into the mani they boost 1.5-2 BAR with the throttle closed!
03-08-2007, 12:47 PM
#57
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 0
Re: Anti Lag
Originally Posted by Shizuma
I'm not going to quote you 'cause it'd be huge 
It's cool about the mis-quote, I was kinda like wtf?...anyway the early MR2 and st165 3s-gte's weren't that great, they were Toyota's first attempts at an engine of that nature...they took the 3s-ge lowered the compression and turbocharged it...as time went on, the later versions of the 3s-gte got better with the st185 and finally th st205 being the best. The fact that Toyota still uses the 3s-gte in it's Caldina is testement to its worth as an engine...as per your 5th point, no argument there, the head on the engine sucks, and yes the B series and the 4ag heads will outflow the head on the 3s...in all fairness though, they were designed to be N/A and therefore have greater emphasis on head design...as for the turbo, yea they suck, most OEM turbos of that era do suck (the t25 on the 4g63 included)...as for the 4g63's unreliability, you're correct on their merit in terms of an engine, that was a bad call by me...when I think about it is the tranny and poor maintainence that craps out most of the time (those are their own problems, and probably take away from the reliability of the car, but not of the engine)...anyway, I still agree with you that to build a good 3s-gte is expensive, and that parts for the st205 are expensive and rare, and furthermore, while dropping one into the 86 chassis might sound cool...it will probably disrupt the car's handling and responsiveness which is what it's famous for in the first place...lol and I don't think you're an -------, I just don't think that going so far as to say the 3s-gte is a piece is necessarily correct IMO...putting it in an '86 is........
It's cool about the mis-quote, I was kinda like wtf?...anyway the early MR2 and st165 3s-gte's weren't that great, they were Toyota's first attempts at an engine of that nature...they took the 3s-ge lowered the compression and turbocharged it...as time went on, the later versions of the 3s-gte got better with the st185 and finally th st205 being the best. The fact that Toyota still uses the 3s-gte in it's Caldina is testement to its worth as an engine...as per your 5th point, no argument there, the head on the engine sucks, and yes the B series and the 4ag heads will outflow the head on the 3s...in all fairness though, they were designed to be N/A and therefore have greater emphasis on head design...as for the turbo, yea they suck, most OEM turbos of that era do suck (the t25 on the 4g63 included)...as for the 4g63's unreliability, you're correct on their merit in terms of an engine, that was a bad call by me...when I think about it is the tranny and poor maintainence that craps out most of the time (those are their own problems, and probably take away from the reliability of the car, but not of the engine)...anyway, I still agree with you that to build a good 3s-gte is expensive, and that parts for the st205 are expensive and rare, and furthermore, while dropping one into the 86 chassis might sound cool...it will probably disrupt the car's handling and responsiveness which is what it's famous for in the first place...lol and I don't think you're an -------, I just don't think that going so far as to say the 3s-gte is a piece is necessarily correct IMO...putting it in an '86 is........
?lets e race for e money
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
