Forced Induction Custom FI Setup Questions

.60/.48 too small?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-14-2004, 08:42 PM
  #11  
3.0 BAR
 
B16Drag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,200
Default Re:.60/.48 too small?

how are you losing top end when you've made the hp downlow and still making power up top. Its not like you've plateau'ed the amount of hp you are making on the dyno. Its still a linear gain in power throughout the rpm.

I know using a t3/t4 will give you a bigger kick in the *** but this "kick" is higher in the rpm range. Some people prefer to get a lil kick in the lower range and feel it throughout, while others just like a big kick in the ***.

Regardless of whether someone goes with a T3 .48/.60 or a T3/T4 or a SC61, for that fact, the amount of power is still limited by the block itself. T3 .48/.60 will spool well and make plenty of ponies on a stock B16 block. 8-12psi on a T3 is still in the "efficient" range of that turbo.
B16Drag is offline  
Old 12-14-2004, 10:47 PM
  #12  
0.0 BAR
 
beerbongskickass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Default Re:.60/.48 too small?

http://www.streettuners.com/curve/en...ecs.html#civic

Where do B16's make their peak power? 7600-7800 rpms.
Where do B16's make their peak torque? 7000-7300 rpms.

Makes sense to me using a turbo that works best at higher rpms. It looks like that is exactly where the power band is on the B16.
beerbongskickass is offline  
Old 12-15-2004, 05:48 PM
  #13  
3.0 BAR
 
nonvtec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,950
Default Re:.60/.48 too small?

I have a 48/60 on my D15 and its perfect, B16's should go big
nonvtec is offline  
Old 12-15-2004, 06:03 PM
  #14  
3.0 BAR
 
Dr.Boost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 21,479
Default Re:.60/.48 too small?

Originally Posted by hotrex
for most of the RPM range--------yuo just answered your own question...turbo is too smalll who the hell doesnt want op end pull?? youll lose everytime with no top end. mean thats were a honda makes all its power
^^^This is coming from a guy who was trying to tell me a D16 doesn't need anything bigger than a .48ex. Now you agree that topend owns all. :P
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
Dr.Boost is offline  
Old 12-16-2004, 11:13 AM
  #15  
0.0 BAR
Thread Starter
 
b16civic93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 41
Default Re:.60/.48 too small?

so basically you all are saying that even though i can get a ss log manifold, that turbo, downpipe, dumptube, all bolts and gaskets needed for 700 shipped it wouldnt be a good idea for my b16? the reason i like it is because i know everything fits. i could get everything mentioned minus the turbo for 550 shipped, do you think i should do that and just find a bigger turbo? what size would you recommend? anyone have one for sale?
b16civic93 is offline  
Old 12-16-2004, 11:14 AM
  #16  
0.0 BAR
Thread Starter
 
b16civic93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 41
Default Re:.60/.48 too small?

also the compressor side is on the passenger side of the car incase you had a turbo for sale i'm not sure what the technical term for that is
b16civic93 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
saut
General Discussion
1
06-29-2013 08:42 PM
SmoothGS
Forced Induction
5
04-17-2004 07:44 PM
2000vsm
Forced Induction
13
06-19-2003 03:48 PM
djrizzo
Forced Induction
1
04-03-2003 03:45 PM
gperna
Forced Induction
4
02-21-2003 04:47 PM



Quick Reply: .60/.48 too small?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:16 AM.