.48/.42 to .48/.60 conversion
#41
Re: .48/.42 to .48/.60 conversion
Until you measure the actual turbo's that we're talking about, I won't rely on the fact that you work at a turbo shop or that you feel so superior in knowledge to a guy that simply measured two different turbo's and didn't find a difference. You're not fooling anyone.
#42
Re: .48/.42 to .48/.60 conversion
the exducer size is the same between a .42 and a .60 compressor, so you can use the same backing plate, just put on a .60 compressor wheel and compressor cover. Only the inducer size is different.
#43
Re: .48/.42 to .48/.60 conversion
Originally Posted by Stealthmode
I stared at the wheels/housings, and measured them with a mic, and I came to the conclusion that they are the same. JD said they are different, but he never said why he thinks that.
The .60 A/R has a 60 trim wheel and the .42 A/R has a 50 trim wheel, regardless of what car you took it off of. They're still Garrett T3's and are still the same turbo. You still suck at measuring, and you're still wrong. Why you can't admit defeat is something that YOU have to work on.
I'm showing you proof and you're still struggling to hold on. You lost a long time ago.
Originally Posted by accordepicenter
the exducer size is the same between a .42 and a .60 compressor, so you can use the same backing plate, just put on a .60 compressor wheel and compressor cover. Only the inducer size is different.
But tell that to thick headed Steathmode who can't take being wrong.
#44
Re: .48/.42 to .48/.60 conversion
You must be forgetting that one of us actually measured the turbo's we're talking about. I said that JD mentioned they were different but didn't say why he thought this to show that:
1. I measured them, and didn't see any difference whatsoever.
2. JD said they were different, but didn't say why he thought that.
Simple study of communication will show that I was giving a reason why I could be mistaken, but it hadn't been discussed. Your simple this is that and that is this and I'm supposed to have missed a 4mm difference isn't cutting it. Especially since you haven't even measured the two turbo's we're talking about. You're going off of theory, and against a real world measurement, I'm not seeing how all of a sudden there was a 4mm difference when there wasn't.
Yes, I need to be right soooo bad that I offered up another theory after stating what I saw. If I wanted to be correct sooooo bad, I wouldn't have even offered the unbacked opinion of someone who said they were different. The bottom line isn't who needs to be right, it's what is right. What is right can't be found by a self proclaimed turbo genious without the two turbo's in his possession. How many times do I have to say it?
1. I measured them, and didn't see any difference whatsoever.
2. JD said they were different, but didn't say why he thought that.
Simple study of communication will show that I was giving a reason why I could be mistaken, but it hadn't been discussed. Your simple this is that and that is this and I'm supposed to have missed a 4mm difference isn't cutting it. Especially since you haven't even measured the two turbo's we're talking about. You're going off of theory, and against a real world measurement, I'm not seeing how all of a sudden there was a 4mm difference when there wasn't.
Yes, I need to be right soooo bad that I offered up another theory after stating what I saw. If I wanted to be correct sooooo bad, I wouldn't have even offered the unbacked opinion of someone who said they were different. The bottom line isn't who needs to be right, it's what is right. What is right can't be found by a self proclaimed turbo genious without the two turbo's in his possession. How many times do I have to say it?
#45
Re: .48/.42 to .48/.60 conversion
Originally Posted by sixsick6
Newsflash- .60 A/R housings have 60 trim wheels and .42 A/R have 50 trim wheels. Call any turbo shop you want and they'll tell you the same thing.
Hey look, here's a super 60 "60 TRIM" with a .42 A/R COMPRESSOR HOUSING. Durka durka.
#46
Re: .48/.42 to .48/.60 conversion
Interesting... I knew you could put a 50 trim in a 60 housing, but I always thought it would never work right? I thought if the housings didnt match up to the wheel ( being 4mm or whatever it is) smaller it may not boost right? Is using the larger housing with a smaller wheel going to benifit that much?
hmmmm, maybe I should just try it since I have several sitting in the garage.
hmmmm, maybe I should just try it since I have several sitting in the garage.
#47
Re: .48/.42 to .48/.60 conversion
my guess is that with a 50 trim wheel in a 60 trim housing youre gonna be losing a bit of compressor efficiency because its probably gonna have to spin faster to create boost because of the improperly sized inducer on the 50 trim wheel if used in a 60 trim housing, but itll probably still boost fine.
#48
Re: .48/.42 to .48/.60 conversion
Originally Posted by Stealthmode
Hey look, here's a super 60 "60 TRIM" with a .42 A/R COMPRESSOR HOUSING. Durka durka.
#50
Re: .48/.42 to .48/.60 conversion
Originally Posted by Stealthmode
You must be forgetting that one of us actually measured the turbo's we're talking about.
Originally Posted by Stealthmode
I said that JD mentioned they were different but didn't say why he thought this to show that
Originally Posted by Stealthmode
1. I measured them, and didn't see any difference whatsoever.
Originally Posted by Stealthmode
2. JD said they were different, but didn't say why he thought that.
Originally Posted by Stealthmode
Simple study of communication will show that I was giving a reason why I could be mistaken, but it hadn't been discussed.
Originally Posted by Stealthmode
Your simple this is that and that is this and I'm supposed to have missed a 4mm difference isn't cutting it.
Originally Posted by Stealthmode
Especially since you haven't even measured the two turbo's we're talking about. You're going off of theory, and against a real world measurement, I'm not seeing how all of asudden there was a 4mm difference when there wasn't.
Originally Posted by Stealthmode
Yes, I need to be right soooo bad that I offered up another theory after stating what I saw. If I wanted to be correct sooooo bad, I wouldn't have even offered the unbacked opinion of someone who said they were different. The bottom line isn't who needs to be right, it's what is right.
Originally Posted by Stealthmode
What is right can't be found by a self proclaimed turbo genious without the two turbo's in his possession. How many times do I have to say it?
Originally Posted by Stealthmode
Hey look, here's a super 60 "60 TRIM" with a .42 A/R COMPRESSOR HOUSING. Durka durka.
I'll show you:
1.900^2=3.61
2.367^2=5.602689
3.61/5.602689*100=64 and whomever is selling that turbo is as moronic and ignorant as you are. the .42 A/R housing can easily be machined with a bench lathe. You do know what a bench lathe is right? I bet if you took the compressor housing off you'd find someone hacked away at it with a dremel instead of doing it correctly. You can fit whatever you want with whatever you want provided you're not an idiot, can measure correctly, and have an IQ higher than 4mm or .156"...wait...I meant an IQ above 95.
Durka Durka.
Originally Posted by AbaZ
Interesting... I knew you could put a 50 trim in a 60 housing, but I always thought it would never work right? I thought if the housings didnt match up to the wheel ( being 4mm or whatever it is) smaller it may not boost right? Is using the larger housing with a smaller wheel going to benifit that much?
Originally Posted by accordepicenter
my guess is that with a 50 trim wheel in a 60 trim housing youre gonna be losing a bit of compressor efficiency because its probably gonna have to spin faster to create boost because of the improperly sized inducer on the 50 trim wheel if used in a 60 trim housing, but itll probably still boost fine.
Originally Posted by accordepicenter
i have both wheels sitting upstairs in my shelf. I also have a caliper in my basement somewhere. Im just too lazy to find it
1.674^2=2.802276 and 2.367^2=5.602689
2.802276/5.60289=0.5001662*100=drumrrrrrrrrrrrrrrolllllll.5 0 or 50 trim.
Hopefully this will now sink in to Stealth but I highly doubt it.