Is 2.0" Charge piping too small for the turb??
01-11-2007, 07:47 PM
#11
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 33
Re: Is 2.0" Charge piping too small for the turb??
Originally Posted by 90boostdaccord
based on your thinking, it would make more sense to have smaller piping, more pressure= less lag. i wouldn't run less than 2" for sure either way though.
01-11-2007, 08:02 PM
#12
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 0
Re: Is 2.0" Charge piping too small for the turb??
Originally Posted by sirclay
I donno cheif, more pressure usually equals more lag because the compressor wheel has to spin with a larger force agents it.
i'm not 100% postive that this is true, however, i've read it numerous times, and it just kinda seems to make more sense in my head.
01-11-2007, 08:20 PM
#13
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,161
Re: Is 2.0" Charge piping too small for the turb??
Originally Posted by 90boostdaccord
considering that there will really be no air held in the charge pipes, i'd have to agree with the smaller piping= less lag.
i'm not 100% postive that this is true, however, i've read it numerous times, and it just kinda seems to make more sense in my head.
i'm not 100% postive that this is true, however, i've read it numerous times, and it just kinda seems to make more sense in my head.
Yes.
Originally Posted by 90boostdaccord
considering that there will really be no air held in the charge pipes, i'd have to agree with the smaller piping= less lag.
i'm not 100% postive that this is true, however, i've read it numerous times, and it just kinda seems to make more sense in my head.
i'm not 100% postive that this is true, however, i've read it numerous times, and it just kinda seems to make more sense in my head.
No.
The End.
JP
01-11-2007, 10:06 PM
#17
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,161
Re: Is 2.0" Charge piping too small for the turb??
Originally Posted by AJxr
i can read it sour nuts 
but it is a tiny bit fuzzy
but it is a tiny bit fuzzy
Thanks, it's on glow or whatever so that's the fuzzy you see kind of like lights at night or something. It's not unrealy fat fuzzy or anything.
Originally Posted by jagojon3
Sorry bout the nuts.
Yea I just see a solid red box.
Yea I just see a solid red box.
JP
01-12-2007, 02:43 AM
#19
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,057
Re: Is 2.0" Charge piping too small for the turb??
ive used both small and 2.5", my last setup i had 2.5" charge pipes, my current setup i have hose with about 1.75 ID, i have to say the lag is close to the same, if not a little less with the small pipe, and i made more whp with the same turbo using stock eclipse charge hose and some radiotor hose, and then the stock civic intake arm cut about 2" shorter which has probly a little over 2" id, my un-educated concusion is ---- it use whatever. unless maybe your flowing alot of air making alot of hp i wouldnt recomend small stuff
01-12-2007, 03:00 AM
#20
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 0
Re: Is 2.0" Charge piping too small for the turb??
wow, been 8 years.....
but a Callaway VW kit from a Wabbit on Shitrocco using 2" OD pipes, using windshield washer fluid (high alky content) to cool the charge and help with detonation.......he then moved onto Ruf's until a dumb bitch in Miami and him on a 750cc scooter.....
Jeff was ahead of the times.....HMT 5-6 years before it ever happened
but a Callaway VW kit from a Wabbit on Shitrocco using 2" OD pipes, using windshield washer fluid (high alky content) to cool the charge and help with detonation.......he then moved onto Ruf's until a dumb bitch in Miami and him on a 750cc scooter.....
Jeff was ahead of the times.....HMT 5-6 years before it ever happened
