Forced Induction Custom FI Setup Questions

Is 2.0" Charge piping too small for the turb??

Old Jan 11, 2007 | 07:47 PM
  #11  
sirclay's Avatar
0.0 BAR
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 33
Default Re: Is 2.0" Charge piping too small for the turb??

Originally Posted by 90boostdaccord
based on your thinking, it would make more sense to have smaller piping, more pressure= less lag. i wouldn't run less than 2" for sure either way though.
I donno cheif, more pressure usually equals more lag because the compressor wheel has to spin with a larger force agents it.
Old Jan 11, 2007 | 08:02 PM
  #12  
90accordIHI's Avatar
0.0 BAR
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 0
Default Re: Is 2.0" Charge piping too small for the turb??

Originally Posted by sirclay
I donno cheif, more pressure usually equals more lag because the compressor wheel has to spin with a larger force agents it.
considering that there will really be no air held in the charge pipes, i'd have to agree with the smaller piping= less lag.

i'm not 100% postive that this is true, however, i've read it numerous times, and it just kinda seems to make more sense in my head.
Old Jan 11, 2007 | 08:20 PM
  #13  
samson's Avatar
3.0 BAR
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,161
Default Re: Is 2.0" Charge piping too small for the turb??

Originally Posted by 90boostdaccord
considering that there will really be no air held in the charge pipes, i'd have to agree with the smaller piping= less lag.

i'm not 100% postive that this is true, however, i've read it numerous times, and it just kinda seems to make more sense in my head.

Yes.

Originally Posted by 90boostdaccord
considering that there will really be no air held in the charge pipes, i'd have to agree with the smaller piping= less lag.

i'm not 100% postive that this is true, however, i've read it numerous times, and it just kinda seems to make more sense in my head.

No.


The End.


JP
Old Jan 11, 2007 | 08:45 PM
  #15  
AJxr's Avatar
1.5 BAR
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 786
Default Re: Is 2.0" Charge piping too small for the turb??

i can read it sour nuts

but it is a tiny bit fuzzy
Old Jan 11, 2007 | 10:06 PM
  #17  
samson's Avatar
3.0 BAR
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,161
Default Re: Is 2.0" Charge piping too small for the turb??

Originally Posted by AJxr
i can read it sour nuts

but it is a tiny bit fuzzy

Thanks, it's on glow or whatever so that's the fuzzy you see kind of like lights at night or something. It's not unrealy fat fuzzy or anything.


Originally Posted by jagojon3
Sorry bout the nuts.

Yea I just see a solid red box.
I'll take the glow off. Thanks for the tip. What browser?


JP
Old Jan 12, 2007 | 02:43 AM
  #19  
WTF's Avatar
WTF
3.0 BAR
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,057
Default Re: Is 2.0" Charge piping too small for the turb??

ive used both small and 2.5", my last setup i had 2.5" charge pipes, my current setup i have hose with about 1.75 ID, i have to say the lag is close to the same, if not a little less with the small pipe, and i made more whp with the same turbo using stock eclipse charge hose and some radiotor hose, and then the stock civic intake arm cut about 2" shorter which has probly a little over 2" id, my un-educated concusion is ---- it use whatever. unless maybe your flowing alot of air making alot of hp i wouldnt recomend small stuff
Old Jan 12, 2007 | 03:00 AM
  #20  
Bone1's Avatar
0.0 BAR
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 0
Default Re: Is 2.0" Charge piping too small for the turb??

wow, been 8 years.....

but a Callaway VW kit from a Wabbit on Shitrocco using 2" OD pipes, using windshield washer fluid (high alky content) to cool the charge and help with detonation.......he then moved onto Ruf's until a dumb bitch in Miami and him on a 750cc scooter.....

Jeff was ahead of the times.....HMT 5-6 years before it ever happened

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:05 PM.