log+gt28+a/c=tight

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

12-20-2007, 12:59 PM

#11

HMTguy

Guest

Posts: n/a

Re: log+gt28+a/c=tight

Quote:

Originally Posted by Inquisition

The only thing I can say is I consistently disagree with how you route your WG into the downpipe. It should be done right before the oil pan when the DP kicks back straight. I'd love to see a dyno chart of this car. I have a strong feeling once the WG opens, the power production gets completely wavy.

12-20-2007, 02:37 PM

#12

Sync200Wade

0.0 BAR

Join Date: May 2007

Posts: 13

Re: log+gt28+a/c=tight

I agree,but i have seen setups get by somehow. I got tired of it, so since we dont have emissions laws here and everyone is a ricer, i just route them all behind the pan or out the bumper per request

12-20-2007, 05:04 PM

#13

RENR

3.0 BAR

Join Date: Jan 2003

Posts: 4,401

Re: log+gt28+a/c=tight

nice work the only thing i see is the dump tube needs a small flex section or it will eventually crack.

12-20-2007, 05:15 PM

#14

78NOVA

3.0 BAR

Join Date: Dec 2005

Posts: 2,299

Re: log+gt28+a/c=tight

Quote:

Originally Posted by jagojon3

That's an a/c compressor, not a power steering pump.

haha you got me once more...----, im slacking, not working on cars all winter really gets to me. not having a heated garage bites ***.

12-20-2007, 05:44 PM

#15

onlyflash944

1.5 BAR

Join Date: Oct 2006

Posts: 964

Re: log+gt28+a/c=tight

Quote:

Originally Posted by 78NOVA

haha you got me once more...----, im slacking, not working on cars all winter really gets to me. not having a heated garage bites ***.

I <3 Carhartt. Maybe Santa will bring you some

12-20-2007, 05:46 PM

#16

one2many

1.0 BAR

Join Date: Oct 2007

Posts: 468

Re: log+gt28+a/c=tight

Quote:

Originally Posted by jagojon3

you know nothing ! please, stick to your general bullshit side of the forum.

12-20-2007, 06:00 PM

#17

Inquisition

1.5 BAR

Join Date: Apr 2006

Posts: 676

Re: log+gt28+a/c=tight

Quote:

Originally Posted by jagojon3

Jago, I'd agree if it were going on a POS setup that didn't matter, but a GT28rs turbo is $1000+. It's not a joke setup. The WG dumping into the exhaust with that small of a turbine/downpipe is just going to cause greater turbulance/back pressure/turbine inefficiency resulting in power loss. Routing it another 1.5' down stream in a less abrupt manner would minimize those issues.