TurboEdit: difference between linear and step ign. retard?
12-08-2004, 12:26 PM
#1
0.0 BAR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 43
TurboEdit: difference between linear and step ign. retard?
Hallo,
i played a bit with the TE ign. retard.
linear retard is clear for me but whats the advantage or the step retard?
if i take the -0.25° in step mode i get far far more advance under full boost then with linear mode?!
ok more advance gives me more power but the difference is very huge... isn't this a bit too dangerous?
and whats the advantage of a step instead of a linear interpolation of the ign. map?
i thought that linear is even smoother and gets a smoother power band or am i wrong?
please let me know some technical details on that issue.
Thanks
Malte.
i played a bit with the TE ign. retard.
linear retard is clear for me but whats the advantage or the step retard?
if i take the -0.25° in step mode i get far far more advance under full boost then with linear mode?!
ok more advance gives me more power but the difference is very huge... isn't this a bit too dangerous?
and whats the advantage of a step instead of a linear interpolation of the ign. map?
i thought that linear is even smoother and gets a smoother power band or am i wrong?
please let me know some technical details on that issue.
Thanks
Malte.
12-08-2004, 12:38 PM
#2
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 11,058
Re:TurboEdit: difference between linear and step ign. retard?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1989CivicSi
Engine Management
1
08-31-2006 05:20 PM
