Engine Management eCtune , Crome , AFC , FMU , Zdyne , Hondata , EMS , TE , Uberdata Anything to control your fuel, spark needs!

air/fuel ratio explained *good article*

Old 03-17-2005, 02:25 PM
  #1  
3.0 BAR
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 11,059
Default air/fuel ratio explained *good article*

here's a good article from the vp of engineering for innovative.......


By Klaus Allmendinger, VP of Engineering, Innovate Motorsports
Many people with turbochargers believe that they need to run at very rich mixtures. The theory is that the excess fuel cools the intake charge and therefore reduces the probability of knock. It does work in reducing knock, but not because of charge cooling. The following little article shows why.

First let’s look at the science. Specific heat is the amount of energy required to raise 1 kg of material by one degree K (Kelvin, same as Celsius but with 0 point at absolute zero). Different materials have different specific heats. The energy is measured in kJ or kilojoules:

Air ~ 1 kJ/( kg * deg K)
Gasoline 2.02 kJ/( kg * deg K)
Water 4.18 kJ/( kg * deg K)
Ethanol 2.43 kJ/( kg * deg K)
Methanol 2.51 kJ/( kg * deg K)

Fuel and other liquids also have what's called latent heat. This is the heat energy required to vaporize 1 kg of the liquid. The fuel in an internal combustion engine has to be vaporized and mixed thoroughly with the incoming air to produce power. Liquid gasoline does not burn. The energy to vaporize the fuel comes partially from the incoming air, cooling it. The latent heat energy required is actually much larger than the specific heat. That the energy comes from the incoming air can be easily seen on older carbureted cars, where frost can actually form on the intake manifold from the cooling of the charge.

The latent heat values of different liquids are shown here:

Gasoline 350 kJ/kg
Water 2256 kJ/kg
Ethanol 904 kJ/kg
Methanol 1109 kJ/kg

Most engines produce maximum power (with optimized ignition timing) at an air-fuel-ratio between 12 and 13. Let's assume the optimum is in the middle at 12.5. This means that for every kg of air, 0.08 kg of fuel is mixed in and vaporized. The vaporization of the fuel extracts 28 kJ of energy from the air charge. If the mixture has an air-fuel-ratio of 11 instead, the vaporization extracts 31.8 kJ instead. A difference of 3.8 kJ. Because air has a specific heat of about 1 kJ/kg*deg K, the air charge is only 3.8 C (or K) degrees cooler for the rich mixture compared to the optimum power mixture. This small difference has very little effect on knock or power output.

If instead of the richer mixture about 10% (by mass) of water would be injected in the intake charge (0.008 kg Water/kg air), the high latent heat of the water would cool the charge by 18 degrees, about 4 times the cooling effect of the richer mixture. The added fuel for the rich mixture can't burn because there is just not enough oxygen available. So it does not matter if fuel or water is added.

So where does the knock suppression of richer mixtures come from?

If the mixture gets ignited by the spark, a flame front ------s out from the spark plug. This burning mixture increases the pressure and temperature in the cylinder. At some time in the process the pressures and temperatures peak. The speed of the flame front is dependent on mixture density and AFR. A richer or leaner AFR than about 12-13 AFR burns slower. A denser mixture burns faster.

So with a turbo under boost the mixture density raises and results in a faster burning mixture. The closer the peak pressure is to TDC, the higher that peak pressure is, resulting in a high knock probability. Also there is less leverage on the crankshaft for the pressure to produce torque, and, therefore, less power.

Richening up the mixture results in a slower burn, moving the pressure peak later where there is more leverage, hence more torque. Also the pressure peak is lower at a later crank angle and the knock probability is reduced. The same effect can be achieved with an optimum power mixture and more ignition retard.

Optimum mix with “later” ignition can produce more power because more energy is released from the combustion of gasoline. Here’s why: When hydrocarbons like gasoline combust, the burn process actually happens in multiple stages. First the gasoline molecules are broken up into hydrogen and carbon. The hydrogen combines with oxygen from the air to form H2O (water) and the carbon molecules form CO. This process happens very fast at the front edge of the flame front. The second stage converts CO to CO2. This process is relatively slow and requires water molecules (from the first stage) for completion. If there is no more oxygen available (most of it consumed in the first stage), the second stage can't happen. But about 2/3 of the energy released from the burning of the carbon is released in the second stage. Therefore a richer mixture releases less energy, lowering peak pressures and temperatures, and produces less power. A secondary side effect is of course also a lowering of knock probability. It's like closing the throttle a little. A typical engine does not knock when running on part throttle because less energy and therefore lower pressures and temperatures are in the cylinder.

This is why running overly-rich mixtures can not only increase fuel consumption, but also cost power.
projekteg is offline  
Old 03-17-2005, 02:51 PM
  #2  
3.0 BAR
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,449
Default Re: air/fuel ratio explained *good article*

might be nice to give them a plug

LM-1 is a great WB, i love mine

www.innovatemotorsports.com
Chris Harris is offline  
Old 03-19-2005, 12:49 AM
  #3  
1.0 BAR
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 292
Default Re: air/fuel ratio explained *good article*

Interesting read there. Might have to read over it a couple times. I didn't know that people thought adding more fuel cooled intake charge...
alfaaay is offline  
Old 03-19-2005, 02:09 AM
  #4  
3.0 BAR
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,832
Default Re: air/fuel ratio explained *good article*

Nice little article. Has some very valid points, the biggest being the latent heat stuff.
In the absence of water injection, Im still a believer in running high 11's and low 12's A/F when running on the ragged edge of pump gas. IMHO
I think that on a average 200-300whp HMT setup, the power gains from moving from a 12.5 to a 12 A/F would be barely even perceptable on your average dynojet.
I remember when I went to EFI 101, Mr Strader commented on never running a high horse boosted engines at more than 12.5 a/f with the exception of Porche air-cooled engines.

One of the ways I look at it, is that when pushing pump gas to the limit, its the end gases in the chamber that do the pinging, and assuming that there is never really a perfect %100 atomized A/F mixture present in the chamber, that little bit of extra fuel help ensure those end gases are nice and rich.
Besides, the extra smidgen of fuel helps me sleep better at night.

Dave
leed is offline  
Old 03-19-2005, 06:02 AM
  #5  
3.0 BAR
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 5,049
Default Re: air/fuel ratio explained *good article*

good quick read.

Addresses a few issues that don't really get a lot of attention when people talk AFR's and tuning.
Cray91 is offline  
Old 03-19-2005, 07:14 AM
  #6  
3.0 BAR
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,285
Default Re: air/fuel ratio explained *good article*

Nice find Kevin. I think there's also a video of it on their site explaining all this info as well. Good to read up about though.
tranceminister is offline  
Old 03-20-2005, 08:25 PM
  #7  
0.0 BAR
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 9
Default Re: air/fuel ratio explained *good article*

Confusing, but interesting! The main thing I dont get is, if 12.5 is usually where the most power come from, then why do people tune their car for 14.7 or stoich? Is a stoich tune just basically a base map?
eg6hatch315 is offline  
Old 03-20-2005, 08:50 PM
  #8  
1.0 BAR
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 375
Default Re: air/fuel ratio explained *good article*

Fuel economy (best Gas Mileage)

A stoich tune is tuning your maps A/F ratio to 14.7 the balance of Air and fuel to make the most efficient burn of the gas (Fuel economy). A base map however can be very rich (Iniatial basemap before tuning 10-11 AFR) with closed loop O2 feedback ( as well as other feedback) to the ECU will try to reach or hunts for the 14.7 AFR. N/A and turbo maps will be tuned (from basemap) to gradually reach maybe 13.5 starting from 15 for N/A applications and possibly 12.5 AFR during boost tranistion load to 12 or lower in boost depending on the amount of boost your running.At least this is what I have learned from forums like HMT and Uberdata.
iflybye is offline  
Old 03-20-2005, 08:58 PM
  #9  
0.0 BAR
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 9
Default Re: air/fuel ratio explained *good article*

So really what you would want to tune for is 12-13 AFR?
eg6hatch315 is offline  
Old 03-20-2005, 09:00 PM
  #10  
1.0 BAR
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 375
Default Re: air/fuel ratio explained *good article*

Depends if you are boosted or not boosted. Thats the first question to to answer.
iflybye is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
98ctr
Engine Management
40
08-11-2006 04:59 PM
crx2fast
General Discussion
0
11-18-2005 11:27 AM
sunny jay
Wanted
4
07-10-2005 07:34 PM
JDMCIVIC
Turbo Parts For Sale
1
01-10-2003 05:48 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: air/fuel ratio explained *good article*


Contact Us - Sitemap - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

© 2019 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.