2.5" or 3.0" exhaust?

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

08-23-2005, 02:07 AM

#11

Ravage70

3.0 BAR

Join Date: Jan 2004

Posts: 5,933

Re: 2.5" or 3.0" exhaust?

well that cuz where u live everything costs 2-3 times more

08-23-2005, 02:13 AM

#12

Spenser

3.0 BAR

Join Date: Aug 2003

Posts: 3,930

Re: 2.5" or 3.0" exhaust?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snafubmx234

Quote:

Originally Posted by surfer

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snafubmx234

2.5 mandrel.

3" crush would be okay, but the crush bends tend to be very restrictive.

i wouldnt have thought the 3" crush bends would have an internal diameter of less than 2.5" though

Fluid dynamics son. If you keep chaing the diameter of the piping, you lose velocity. That is what exhaust is all about, velocity.

I"m sorry but you're a dumb ------- idiot. Post turbo exhaust has nothing to do with velocity. You want least amount of back pressure. the bigger the exhaust, the better. Period. ------- schween.

08-23-2005, 02:28 AM

#13

R-MAK

0.0 BAR

Join Date: Feb 2003

Posts: 0

Re: 2.5" or 3.0" exhaust?

im running a full 3".

08-23-2005, 02:37 AM

#14

Spenser

3.0 BAR

Join Date: Aug 2003

Posts: 3,930

Re: 2.5" or 3.0" exhaust?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Travis

im running a full 3".

stop lying ******.

08-23-2005, 01:21 PM

#15

surfer

1.5 BAR

Thread Starter

Join Date: Nov 2003

Posts: 771

Re: 2.5" or 3.0" exhaust?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ravage70

well that cuz where u live everything costs 2-3 times more

mandrels are more expensive than crush bends whatever size you have, and yes everything over here is nice and expensive, oh how i love to pay the equivalent of $8 per gallon of fuel.

I dedcided on the 2.5" mandrels as i like my rear LCA's to move!

08-23-2005, 01:59 PM

#16

95IntegRacer

1.0 BAR

Join Date: Mar 2005

Posts: 385

Re: 2.5" or 3.0" exhaust?

get the kteller exhaust... they have 3'' mandrel bent exhaust system for 200$

08-23-2005, 10:42 PM

#17

USS

0.0 BAR

Join Date: Oct 2004

Posts: 0

Re: 2.5" or 3.0" exhaust?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spenser

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snafubmx234

Quote:

Originally Posted by surfer

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snafubmx234

2.5 mandrel.

3" crush would be okay, but the crush bends tend to be very restrictive.

i wouldnt have thought the 3" crush bends would have an internal diameter of less than 2.5" though

Fluid dynamics son. If you keep chaing the diameter of the piping, you lose velocity. That is what exhaust is all about, velocity.

I"m sorry but you're a dumb ------- idiot. Post turbo exhaust has nothing to do with velocity. You want least amount of back pressure. the bigger the exhaust, the better. Period. ------- schween.

Go and ---- your boyfriend in the *** you dumb canuck. Why don't you read up a bit before post ******?

08-23-2005, 11:21 PM

#18

con

0.0 BAR

Join Date: Nov 2003

Posts: 0

Re: 2.5" or 3.0" exhaust?

he is right to a point, na and turbo exhausts are completly differnt when talking about crush bends. You need scavanging on na and crush bends and too large of exhaust kills that but you dont need scavenging on a post turbo exhaust you just dont need restriction or back presure