ixlr8ez

Yeah it is better. I know a few guys that put b16 heads on their gsr's because they're better heads.

bitchasscracker

you are wrong and gay

TurboBoostedEK

this guy put a b16 head on his gsr and said it was a poor mans type-r...he said the b16 head was better...i dunno which is...

bitchasscracker

he is probally dumb just like you

TurboBoostedEK

oh man ur cool...just cuz i don't know as much as some people doesn't make me dumb...i just have a family and a life so i can't sit and read about motors or take classes about it or anything...i have to run the office to put food on the table...

TurboBoostedEK

and i want that damn motor

rsmith2786

B16A2 heads DO flow better than GSR heads so i dont know what you are talking about.

90turboteg

actualy, gsr heads have smaller combustion chambers and bigger ports than a b16. the intake manifold stock is the flaw, if u were to stick a b16 head on a gsr block it would yeild much lower cp witch would make it slower, but better for turbo, if i was gona use a head for all motor ls/vtec i would use a gsr to get the most cp out of it, but if i were to use a b16 head it would be for turbo because on a ls bottom with ls pistons its about 9-6-1. but wiht a gsr head its more like 10-1-1 or around there. gsr heads also have better cams, about 3-5hp difference. but what i like is a gsr combustion chamber, not round but kind of a rectancle or oval for more flow. idk what u guys are thinking when u say b16 heads are better, i dont think so, im pretty dam sure if u put a gsr head on a ls bottom it will yeaild more hp than a b16 head. but to maximise a gsr head u have to get some kind of aftermarket intake mani. just my .02$

rsmith2786

http://www.honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=615254 Your right about compression but wrong about flow which was the original point i was trying to make.