FS Moates Ostrich and Hulog - Never used
#15
Re: FS Moates Ostrich and Hulog - Never used
Sorry, I got this confused with the other Ostrich thread where it didn't sell for months.
I've no need for a V1.0, I don't think it would cause errors using a v1.0 and a v2.0 in parallel, but I'd rather go with a sure thing.
I've no need for a V1.0, I don't think it would cause errors using a v1.0 and a v2.0 in parallel, but I'd rather go with a sure thing.
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: FS Moates Ostrich and Hulog - Never used
Originally Posted by Joseph Davis
Sorry, I got this confused with the other Ostrich thread where it didn't sell for months.
I've no need for a V1.0, I don't think it would cause errors using a v1.0 and a v2.0 in parallel, but I'd rather go with a sure thing.
I've no need for a V1.0, I don't think it would cause errors using a v1.0 and a v2.0 in parallel, but I'd rather go with a sure thing.
#19
Re: FS Moates Ostrich and Hulog - Never used
v1.0 works with the version of TE listed in the Engine Management forum's FAQ. v2.0 is not supported as the choice of baud rates doesn't go high enough for the v2.0; there is a revised version of TE on pgmfi.org's forums that supports the v2.0, however.
Dennog, I keep meaning to do just that but the more I think about it the more I realise I have MAF cars and will just convert every last one to SD.
Dennog, I keep meaning to do just that but the more I think about it the more I realise I have MAF cars and will just convert every last one to SD.