Which wideband to choose?
Thread Starter
0.0 BAR
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 23
Which wideband to choose?
Right now im looking to purchase wideband o2 sensor. Ive got it narrowed down to three that i would like to choose from. I was thinking of picking up the AEM uego all in one, the PLX M-300 or the Innovate LC-1 with stand alone gauge. Anyone have any experience with any of them? Some oppinions would be appreciated. Thanks!
0.0 BAR
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 0
Re: Which wideband to choose?
budget whatever! Thats what I would buy anyway. Get it from www.-------------
0.0 BAR
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 36
Re: Which wideband to choose?
Originally Posted by CSaddict
budget whatever! Thats what I would buy anyway. Get it from www.-------------
1.5 BAR
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 676
Re: Which wideband to choose?
Originally Posted by Cyberdx16
agree LC-1 is not a bad choice at all, especially since they've just released an updated logworks 2, which allows you to log with their new software "PGMFI"
3.0 BAR
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,447
Re: Which wideband to choose?
Originally Posted by Inquisition
Who cares about that software? If it doesn't lambda log, I'm not interested. The other sensors are nice to monitor, but lambda log is one of the key functions of tuning via tables effectively.
It was designed to log the Crome/PGMFI datalogging protocol that comes out of the ECU into the Logworks software, so yes it will log lambda amongst other things.
1.5 BAR
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 676
Re: Which wideband to choose?
The switching of two windows effectively makes lambda log worthless. The whole point of lambda log is logging directly on the fuel map so you can select regions that need work and edit them. Switching back and forth while tuning is just a total pain in the ***. Now if you want to tune a couple of cars, its something one can easily deal with but if you want to tune a number of cars, its just going to be a pain pressing alt+tab every 30 seconds to make changes. I take features for what they are. This logworks package is nothing special considering Freelog and ECUcontrol already exist and Crome, Neptune, and Hondata all do a good job of logging as well.
3.0 BAR
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,447
Re: Which wideband to choose?
Originally Posted by Inquisition
The switching of two windows effectively makes lambda log worthless. The whole point of lambda log is logging directly on the fuel map so you can select regions that need work and edit them. Switching back and forth while tuning is just a total pain in the ***. Now if you want to tune a couple of cars, its something one can easily deal with but if you want to tune a number of cars, its just going to be a pain pressing alt+tab every 30 seconds to make changes. I take features for what they are. This logworks package is nothing special considering Freelog and ECUcontrol already exist and Crome, Neptune, and Hondata all do a good job of logging as well.
LogWorks is free...and much less painful to setup than some of the other free programs out there not to mention it will log a STOCK ecu as well...
