Blown C4 Vette VS TonytheTiger's Turbo v6 Camry
Thread Starter
3.0 BAR
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,811
Blown C4 Vette VS TonytheTiger's Turbo v6 Camry
Centerfugally blown C4 Vette
VS
*Completely* built (around 15-20usd grand) '94 v6 1mz-fe (still 3.0L boosting on 10.2:1 CR!) Camry. GT40/88 @ 12psi (392fwhp - 501bhp) That's not even full boost!?, 4500rpm stall T/C, Fully IPT built transmission.
Everything on the car changed, everything about it custom (Tony & his brother own a Custom performance shop in Canada.) The Biggest, Baddest Camry/ES/Windom on the planet.
*Bump Updated*
Higher quality vid now hosted by Sean's blazing server. (Give it 15min from this post to upload).
*Bump Updated*
Runs are 0-130mph & 0-124mph.
For anyone wondering, The weight should be within a hundred pounds, or so. The Aero cd is the same, with the vette having a smaller frontal section (around 19.4^2ft VS 22.7^2ft)
If anyone has ever doubted me that until you hit *insane* power levels - FWD = RWD *when* given the same supporting mods (LSD/differential geometry, suspension geometry). This is a great example of that!
VS
*Completely* built (around 15-20usd grand) '94 v6 1mz-fe (still 3.0L boosting on 10.2:1 CR!) Camry. GT40/88 @ 12psi (392fwhp - 501bhp) That's not even full boost!?, 4500rpm stall T/C, Fully IPT built transmission.
Everything on the car changed, everything about it custom (Tony & his brother own a Custom performance shop in Canada.) The Biggest, Baddest Camry/ES/Windom on the planet.
*Bump Updated*
I also have a natural gear-based boost control. This friggin' big GT40R doesn't give me full boost on 1st gear...LOL I only get 12-14 psi at 1st gear. When 2nd gear hits, the car is travelling fast enough so the full 20-22 PSI can come in and my car still bites traction. On the video, you can see that I have a power deficit at first gear (the vette pulls clean even when both of us caught traction), but when my 2nd gear came, I had full power and it manage to pull it back. And the rest of the gears was self explanatory.
*Bump Updated*
Runs are 0-130mph & 0-124mph.
For anyone wondering, The weight should be within a hundred pounds, or so. The Aero cd is the same, with the vette having a smaller frontal section (around 19.4^2ft VS 22.7^2ft)
If anyone has ever doubted me that until you hit *insane* power levels - FWD = RWD *when* given the same supporting mods (LSD/differential geometry, suspension geometry). This is a great example of that!
Thread Starter
3.0 BAR
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,811
Re: Blown C4 Vette VS TonytheTiger's Turbo v6 Camry
Tony talks no ---- on the internet, and is a great guy. He'll tell you straight like it is, but doesn't go flabbing around about the teg, or camry.Tony is known across nearly every Toyota forum as being quite classy.
I think you've got the wrong person WOT.
Nice... too bad my buddy has the I4 auto
So it's not much work to slap a 3s-gte turbo manifold on one.
About like most other N/A i4's. Beware of running lean on boost & it won't blow up. Let them run lean & you'll look like a ------- retard. Besides. Toyota builds good bottom ends.
If it's one of the newer i4's, they do well on boost - despite the high compression ratios. You see few of them turbo'd because noone cares to get into custom manifolds.
Ah well!
i think ive seen that camry in streetfire.net not sure but ok
Thread Starter
3.0 BAR
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,811
Re: Blown C4 Vette VS TonytheTiger's Turbo v6 Camry
