thompson won the debate???
01-12-2008, 04:59 PM
#31
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Re: thompson won the debate???
Originally Posted by signorelli21
i don't get your logic, ron paul hates america?
I have not met anyone that supports him that has any socialist ideals, in fact i think you are more likely to find people that agree with him on social issues but disagree on foreign policy, such as yourself and ann coulter. so its more accurate that theres fake right wing nut swingers sending him money.
people like hillary because they want free healthcare and obama because they want chage, not sure what they want to change but that kind of sums them up, they aren't really that interested in ending the war as much as they are for micromanaging it and coming up with new taxes to help pay for it.
I have not met anyone that supports him that has any socialist ideals, in fact i think you are more likely to find people that agree with him on social issues but disagree on foreign policy, such as yourself and ann coulter. so its more accurate that theres fake right wing nut swingers sending him money.
people like hillary because they want free healthcare and obama because they want chage, not sure what they want to change but that kind of sums them up, they aren't really that interested in ending the war as much as they are for micromanaging it and coming up with new taxes to help pay for it.
Originally Posted by Me
could be contruded into being anti-american and anti-establishment more easily
01-12-2008, 06:26 PM
#32
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 0
Re: thompson won the debate???
Originally Posted by random-strike
can't read?
numerous people on this site who love ron paul for whatever reason, don't believe in his ideals...
numerous people on this site who love ron paul for whatever reason, don't believe in his ideals...
01-12-2008, 06:38 PM
#33
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Re: thompson won the debate???
Originally Posted by rawr
If we didn't believe in his ideals we wouldn't support him. You're not the only person on this website with the ability to read
01-12-2008, 08:09 PM
#34
1.5 BAR
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 828
Re: thompson won the debate???
Originally Posted by random-strike
can't read?
numerous people on this site who love ron paul for whatever reason, don't believe in his ideals...
numerous people on this site who love ron paul for whatever reason, don't believe in his ideals...
You obviously can read but seem to choose not to, paul doesn't want to repeal Roe vs. Wade, its not a law anyways but a supreme court decision, the only way it could be repealed is if anouther supreme court decision had a different outcome.
Paul believes that this should not be something the supreme court has any buisness dealing with in the first place because all powers not specifically enumerated by the constitution are left up to the states, since you don;t have a constitutional right to abortion clinics (or to be protected from them) or a public school system for that matter, all of that ---- should be decided by your state government, Paul wrote an article about this two years ago: http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul301.html
01-12-2008, 08:59 PM
#35
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Your mom's panties
Posts: 3,696
Re: thompson won the debate???
r-s you're smoking crack. I support his strict interpretation of the constitution and the bill of rights. However I am pro choice, but you know it really doesn't matter that Paul is pro life, since the final call is left up to the state govts. We disagree there, but I believe that those willing to sacrifice freedom for security deserve neither.
Oh now that I look at the post above me (by signorelli) I agree with him. Why should I agree 100% with what Paul believes morally?
States' rights, bitch. Learn it and love it.
Oh now that I look at the post above me (by signorelli) I agree with him. Why should I agree 100% with what Paul believes morally?
States' rights, bitch. Learn it and love it.
01-12-2008, 09:23 PM
#37
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Re: thompson won the debate???
Originally Posted by signorelli21
It makes it easier if you actually made sense once in a while, noone agrees 100% with paul on every issue, i am Pro-choice but agree with him on pretty much everything else, you act like there is some big secret that he's hiding and when all the liberal ******* find out their run for their lives.
You obviously can read but seem to choose not to, paul doesn't want to repeal Roe vs. Wade, its not a law anyways but a supreme court decision, the only way it could be repealed is if anouther supreme court decision had a different outcome.
Paul believes that this should not be something the supreme court has any buisness dealing with in the first place because all powers not specifically enumerated by the constitution are left up to the states, since you don;t have a constitutional right to abortion clinics (or to be protected from them) or a public school system for that matter, all of that ---- should be decided by your state government, Paul wrote an article about this two years ago: http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul301.html
You obviously can read but seem to choose not to, paul doesn't want to repeal Roe vs. Wade, its not a law anyways but a supreme court decision, the only way it could be repealed is if anouther supreme court decision had a different outcome.
Paul believes that this should not be something the supreme court has any buisness dealing with in the first place because all powers not specifically enumerated by the constitution are left up to the states, since you don;t have a constitutional right to abortion clinics (or to be protected from them) or a public school system for that matter, all of that ---- should be decided by your state government, Paul wrote an article about this two years ago: http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul301.html
Originally Posted by TorganFM
r-s you're smoking crack. I support his strict interpretation of the constitution and the bill of rights. However I am pro choice, but you know it really doesn't matter that Paul is pro life, since the final call is left up to the state govts. We disagree there, but I believe that those willing to sacrifice freedom for security deserve neither.
Oh now that I look at the post above me (by signorelli) I agree with him. Why should I agree 100% with what Paul believes morally?
States' rights, bitch. Learn it and love it.
Oh now that I look at the post above me (by signorelli) I agree with him. Why should I agree 100% with what Paul believes morally?
States' rights, bitch. Learn it and love it.
even california would make it illegal...
the whole reason the feds take over on issues like this is because liberals know no state would pass it.
01-12-2008, 10:48 PM
#39
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Re: thompson won the debate???
Originally Posted by TorganFM
There's only one way to find out.
and all the fake liberal nutcases that run around screaming at people on paul's behalf don't help him. and he even said during the debates it hurts him and he'd wish they would stop
01-12-2008, 11:33 PM
#40
1.0 BAR
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Floresville Tx
Posts: 236
Re: thompson won the debate???
Ron Paul-has a great heart but his ideals are flawed and he needs lots of time to explain them. He will not win.
Thompson- very relaxed, has very realistic answers to the few questions he answers, good ideas with good explanations. He won't win even though this is who i would vote for.
Romney- rich morman, need i say more- if he wins, it would be better then any democrat (very firm on imigration)
McCain- i believe the best man for getting us out of the war in a resonable fasion, not so sure about any of his other pollicies- He could be president
Juliani- great mayor, i don't think he is president material. I don't care about politically correct as much as this guy does.- Won't be president
Huckabee- has great Christian values in a society that is losing values. Spends to much time on romney. Some policy/goals doesn't seem realistic. My next vote is this guy. He has a chance.
Democratic side
Clinton- will allow female emotions to make wrong decisions. if she wins... we are in trouble
obama- better then clinton- still bad idea- medical will go to ----
edwards- is this guy even still in it
I do approve these opinions!!!
Thompson- very relaxed, has very realistic answers to the few questions he answers, good ideas with good explanations. He won't win even though this is who i would vote for.
Romney- rich morman, need i say more- if he wins, it would be better then any democrat (very firm on imigration)
McCain- i believe the best man for getting us out of the war in a resonable fasion, not so sure about any of his other pollicies- He could be president
Juliani- great mayor, i don't think he is president material. I don't care about politically correct as much as this guy does.- Won't be president
Huckabee- has great Christian values in a society that is losing values. Spends to much time on romney. Some policy/goals doesn't seem realistic. My next vote is this guy. He has a chance.
Democratic side
Clinton- will allow female emotions to make wrong decisions. if she wins... we are in trouble
obama- better then clinton- still bad idea- medical will go to ----
edwards- is this guy even still in it
I do approve these opinions!!!
