Pentagon Releases 9/11 Security Video
#83
Re: Pentagon Releases 9/11 Security Video
A good site for some history of WTCs, construction, "demolition", and everything between:
http://www.physics911.ca/
http://www.physics911.ca/
#84
Re: Pentagon Releases 9/11 Security Video
http://911research.wtc7.net/planes/e...lackboxes.html
Ain't that some ----.
The storage medium of each recorder is located in a protective capsule, which must be able to withstand an impact of 3,400 Gs (3,400 times the force of gravity). Additionally, each must also survive flames at 2,000 F for up to 30 minutes, and submersion in 20,000 feet of saltwater for 30 days. Typically, to increase their chances of survival, the recorders are located in the tail section of the aircraft, which usually sustains the least impact in a crash. 7
#85
Re: Pentagon Releases 9/11 Security Video
There is lots of ---- involved with 9/11. How about the fact that the FBI, for whatever reason, doesn't want to release tapes related to the surrounding areas of the pentagon? How about the fact that building 7 had no freakin reason to fall(much like the twin towers), and that wtc 4 and 5 were more damaged than 7 and stood just fine...
Why would the government put a gag order on NYC Firefighters if they didn't have something to say?
Why would the government put a gag order on NYC Firefighters if they didn't have something to say?
#86
Re: Pentagon Releases 9/11 Security Video
Originally Posted by 95BoostedSol
There is lots of ---- involved with 9/11. How about the fact that the FBI, for whatever reason, doesn't want to release tapes related to the surrounding areas of the pentagon? How about the fact that building 7 had no freakin reason to fall(much like the twin towers), and that wtc 4 and 5 were more damaged than 7 and stood just fine...
Why would the government put a gag order on NYC Firefighters if they didn't have something to say?
Why would the government put a gag order on NYC Firefighters if they didn't have something to say?
#88
Re: Pentagon Releases 9/11 Security Video
Originally Posted by ochizon
All conspiracy theorists have are questions. Have an answers to these?
The idea is to answer my question in order to prove me wrong. If you can't answer it, it is because a) you know it is a valid question, but would rather ignore it and make stupid comments or b) you are too stupid to realize that it is a valid question and ignore it and make stupid comments.
You go out and find me cases of buildings with fires that are dying after less than an hour that have fallen. ESPECIALLY those with a complete steel and concrete construction. You show me pictures of the twin towers in a state that would make it understandable that they were going to come crashing down. You show me your side of this argument, don't just knock mine.
If all you can do is tell me that I am an idiot, then you must be to ------- lazy to prove me wrong. Please shut the ---- up....
More: Show me passports that can withstand flying in to a building with a plane that is going to explode on impact, and those passports still being 100% recognizable after the fact. Show me video from the gas station near the pentagon, show me video of the hotel near the pentagon. Explain to me why the other WTC buildings didn't fall when WTC 7 did at 5pm that night(the least damaged of the other small buildings)....
----, defend your side with anything.. Just saying I'm wrong isn't enough, and you know that without me having to say it.