New pics
#12
Re: New pics
Originally Posted by jagojon3
Love SHO's, I used to have an '89.
IMO The Yamaha V6 was better than their V8...
Still a nice ride.
IMO The Yamaha V6 was better than their V8...
Still a nice ride.
#15
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: New pics
Originally Posted by random-strike
if you consider less power better
Originally Posted by ososlohatch
not only less power but slower ...
3.0 liter DOHC V6
Horsepower: 220 hp @ 6200 RPM
0 to 60 mph.6.6 seconds
1/4 mile 15.2 seconds
3.4 liter DOHC V8
Horsepower: 235 hp @ 6100 RPM
0-60 in 7.5 secs
1/4 mile in 15.7 seconds
#16
Re: New pics
Originally Posted by jagojon3
Barely less power, it's still produces more horsepower per liter than the V8 version. The V8's also only come with an automatic tranny, so I know you'd love them.
Care to assume some more?
3.0 liter DOHC V6
Horsepower: 220 hp @ 6200 RPM
0 to 60 mph.6.6 seconds
1/4 mile 15.2 seconds
3.4 liter DOHC V8
Horsepower: 235 hp @ 6100 RPM
0-60 in 7.5 secs
1/4 mile in 15.7 seconds
Care to assume some more?
3.0 liter DOHC V6
Horsepower: 220 hp @ 6200 RPM
0 to 60 mph.6.6 seconds
1/4 mile 15.2 seconds
3.4 liter DOHC V8
Horsepower: 235 hp @ 6100 RPM
0-60 in 7.5 secs
1/4 mile in 15.7 seconds
#20
Re: New pics
Originally Posted by jagojon3
------ right it is. They are both great engines IMO, but the V6 is just more impressive.