View Poll Results: should I
Voters: 40. You may not vote on this poll
Looking into getting a Rottweiler
#21
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Looking into getting a Rottweiler
Originally Posted by chris
My experince my boy dog great dane/pitbull mix literally tried killing my little girl mutt dog when I first got her. The first encounter was him snagging her up from the ground when my back was turned and went right for the throat and me kicking the ---- out of him to let go. Now they are best friends that first meeting needs to be very slow and in a nuetral location like a park. That was my mistake bringing the two together for the first time like that.
#22
Re: Looking into getting a Rottweiler
i hate rotts, they are dumb as bags of hammers and they never ---- solid., its always awful piles of putrid liquid ----. awful B.O. too.
out of the 10 or so rotts ive met/seen whatever only like 1 or 2 wasn't like this. labs are awesome.
im on a boat bitches
out of the 10 or so rotts ive met/seen whatever only like 1 or 2 wasn't like this. labs are awesome.
im on a boat bitches
#23
Re: Looking into getting a Rottweiler
Rotts are one of the smartest dogs and mine lays logs like you wouldn't believe.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Intelligence_of_Dogs
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Intelligence_of_Dogs
#24
Re: Looking into getting a Rottweiler
Originally Posted by 97EconoBox
i hate rotts, they are dumb as bags of hammers and they never ---- solid., its always awful piles of putrid liquid ----. awful B.O. too.
out of the 10 or so rotts ive met/seen whatever only like 1 or 2 wasn't like this. labs are awesome.
out of the 10 or so rotts ive met/seen whatever only like 1 or 2 wasn't like this. labs are awesome.
A diet of cheap dog food mostly consisting of grain byproducts will cause this in a lot of dogs. They can't digest grains properly (they didn't eat corn in the wild) and it'll seep out their skin. You get: nasty ----, nasty farts, nasty smell, nasty fur
#25
Re: Looking into getting a Rottweiler
Originally Posted by Jorsher
If their ---- was putrid liquid and they had awful BO, then they were getting fed poor quality food.
A diet of cheap dog food mostly consisting of grain byproducts will cause this in a lot of dogs. They can't digest grains properly (they didn't eat corn in the wild) and it'll seep out their skin. You get: nasty ----, nasty farts, nasty smell, nasty fur
A diet of cheap dog food mostly consisting of grain byproducts will cause this in a lot of dogs. They can't digest grains properly (they didn't eat corn in the wild) and it'll seep out their skin. You get: nasty ----, nasty farts, nasty smell, nasty fur
#26
Re: Looking into getting a Rottweiler
Originally Posted by Jorsher
If their ---- was putrid liquid and they had awful BO, then they were getting fed poor quality food.
A diet of cheap dog food mostly consisting of grain byproducts will cause this in a lot of dogs. They can't digest grains properly (they didn't eat corn in the wild) and it'll seep out their skin. You get: nasty ----, nasty farts, nasty smell, nasty fur
A diet of cheap dog food mostly consisting of grain byproducts will cause this in a lot of dogs. They can't digest grains properly (they didn't eat corn in the wild) and it'll seep out their skin. You get: nasty ----, nasty farts, nasty smell, nasty fur
Learn something new everyday.
#28
Re: Looking into getting a Rottweiler
Originally Posted by 97EconoBox
Wow, makes complete sense and i never really thoguht about it like that. I mean now that i think of it im certain they did use cheap food as they didnt have a ---- ton of money at the time.
Learn something new everyday.
Learn something new everyday.
The "high quality" science diet, eukanuba, whatever crap at the pet chains aren't really that great either. Better than the cheapest --- but I pay $42.50 for a 30lb bag of grain free, high protein (real meat, not beef "meal"), nutritious food. The less your dog ***** in relation to how much they eat is a good indicator of how healthy the food is. It shows how much is actually being absorbed.
Most dogs eat regular food, and live long happy lives, but obviously the better you feed them, the healthier they'll be. Since switching from science diet, my dog has a glossier coat, doesn't get "greasy" a few days after being washed (she's bathed maybe once a month now), has more energy, less gas, and has more consistent ----.
It only makes sense that paying $0.50 per pound of food is not going to be as healthy as food costing $1 a pound. A lot of companies, like nestle, use their leftover crap that's not human-consumption quality, mix it together, and sell as cheap dog food.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
falkhen
General Discussion
18
04-18-2005 09:45 PM