Re:jackson racing supercharger
 

I agree...

Re:jackson racing supercharger
 

wow this is the first argument turbo/SC that hasned ended in a brawl. Any way i have a crappy recording on one at 10 PSI on a civic Si 2000. here it is: http://www.jdmdelsol.com/super/5best.wav


I like it personally and will beat a turboed SOHC VTEC at 13 PSI. yes this was tested at the local track.

Re:jackson racing supercharger
 

Thats couse random hasnt found this thread yet...lol

Re:jackson racing supercharger
 

true lol

Re:jackson racing supercharger
 

no i have i just hadn't said anything

Re:jackson racing supercharger
 

hahah he speaks!

Re:jackson racing supercharger
 

Yeah Superchargers can sound absolutely sick as hell, but so do turbos ::). Personally I don't want a car that just sounds fast.

Jung

Re:jackson racing supercharger
 

well, a b16 TURBO at 10 psi would own an sohc vtec 13 psi too

Re:jackson racing supercharger
 

well, a b16 TURBO at 10 psi would own an sohc vtec 13 psi too
or at least should and definately could, but some people just suck at tuning...

Jung

Re:jackson racing supercharger
 

I don't think too much of centrifugal superchargers because why bother having lag and lose out on the advantages of a turbine driving your compressor? Roots blowers and whipple chargers are better because they are positive displacement and more efficient than cetrifugal superchargers overall. I guess my real argument is the fact that an exhuast turbine can spin up a compressor pretty fast without a hell of a lot of exhaust pressure while a crank-driven centrifugal compressor has to wait around for its RPM unless coupled to a very well adjusted CVT.