General Discussion Off-Topic Discussion and Enlightenment

iowa

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-06-2008, 03:18 AM
  #61  
0.0 BAR
 
J-SMITH69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Default Re: iowa

Originally Posted by Stealthmode
Yeah, and nobody gives a ----, because that's not the topic that was brought up. The topic was that we're taxed way too much for what we don't get. ----, I don't even want anything, just leave me alone.

What the democrats propose, or what some rich guy pays in taxes isn't the issue. The issue is that our socialist country (the one you keep defending) is bullshit. If a guy makes 100 bazillion dollars and pays 3 million a year in taxes, I DON'T GIVE A ----. What I'm saying is that if I pay even $1,000 a year in taxes, that's $1,000 I don't get to spend, on my family, my life, my pursuit of happiness. Get off your class warfare bullshit and your defense of our government ------- us (and the god damn rich people who didn't hire you as thier lawyer) (and also don't give a ---- about you) and get with the program. We're ALL getting screwed, and it's because people love defending the government when their parties clown is in the hot seat.

If your argument is that the rich guy gets screwed more because he pays more, fine, but the bottom line is when Stevemode gets taxed $1,000 it effects me. When the rich guy makes a bazillion and pays 3 million, he's not fazed. Numerically he's getting screwed harder, yes, but here in the real world, I'm getting screwed harder. Step out of big government Republican talking points and come hang out in America sometime.
once again you go off on a rant that has nothing to do with what we're talking about

all i said was the "rich" pay almost all the income tax which is true.

no one wants to pay income tax, huckabee has the fair tax which is in a better direction...
J-SMITH69 is offline  
Old 01-06-2008, 03:50 AM
  #62  
3.0 BAR
Thread Starter
 
buk9tp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,282
Default Re: iowa

Originally Posted by random-strike
once again you go off on a rant that has nothing to do with what we're talking about

all i said was the "rich" pay almost all the income tax which is true.

no one wants to pay income tax, huckabee has the fair tax which is in a better direction...
fair tax will have you paying the same amount of taxes

he says he wants to get rid of the irs.. but youll still pay taxes in the form of a fair tax or w/e

ron paul wants to get rid of the irs.. and the income tax.. and replace it with nothing
buk9tp is offline  
Old 01-06-2008, 04:01 AM
  #63  
0.0 BAR
 
J-SMITH69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Default Re: iowa

Originally Posted by buk9tp
fair tax will have you paying the same amount of taxes

he says he wants to get rid of the irs.. but youll still pay taxes in the form of a fair tax or w/e

ron paul wants to get rid of the irs.. and the income tax.. and replace it with nothing
once again, i said it was in a better direction. i said nothing about it being perfect.

thanks though
J-SMITH69 is offline  
Old 01-06-2008, 04:41 AM
  #64  
1.5 BAR
 
johnmichael's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 719
Default Re: iowa

Originally Posted by random-strike
once again, i said it was in a better direction.
how is it a better direction? i had almost 20k in taxes taken out this year. if the same amount comes out under fuckabee, how is that an improvement in any way?

edit: you're to HMT political debate what john madden is to monday night football
johnmichael is offline  
Old 01-06-2008, 04:49 AM
  #65  
0.0 BAR
 
Smith-02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 0
Default Re: iowa

Originally Posted by buk9tp
Smith-02 is offline  
Old 01-06-2008, 06:23 AM
  #66  
0.0 BAR
 
J-SMITH69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Default Re: iowa

Originally Posted by johnmichael
how is it a better direction? i had almost 20k in taxes taken out this year. if the same amount comes out under fuckabee, how is that an improvement in any way?

edit: you're to HMT political debate what john madden is to monday night football
edit: get a clue what you're talking about, then talk...

the "fair tax" is a sales tax. so you wouldn't automatically pay the same, and at least you would have a choice to pay or not.

like is said, its a step in a better direction, not the best thing...
J-SMITH69 is offline  
Old 01-06-2008, 07:43 AM
  #67  
1.0 BAR
 
bluerex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 355
Default Re: iowa

Originally Posted by random-strike


like is said, its a step in a better direction, not the best thing...
And the best thing being what?
bluerex is offline  
Old 01-06-2008, 01:28 PM
  #68  
0.0 BAR
 
MikeJ-2009's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 0
Default Re: iowa

Originally Posted by random-strike
once again you go off on a rant that has nothing to do with what we're talking about

all i said was the "rich" pay almost all the income tax which is true.

The origination of the taxes argument was brought up saying exactly what I said about us being squeezed. You may have been correcting his statement of saying the middle class pay most of the taxes, but you took that correction so far as to ignore what he was talking about, which was what I stated above. You've taken the defense of what rich people are paying and completely forgot that you're getting jacked.

MikeJ-2009 is offline  
Old 01-06-2008, 02:54 PM
  #69  
3.0 BAR
 
CspecRun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,505
Default Re: iowa

I probaly was wrong sayin' that the middle class pays a large portion of the income tax in this country. But you have to look at it this way...what percentage of the population is middle class and what percentage is the upper class?? Even if they are paying MORE TAXES per person(household), if the middle class makes up a higher percentage of the population, WE are still paying more of the income tax. You are all right, whoever is paying the most taxes is really irrelevant. I sat down with my last pay stub from last year and crunched some #'s. Last year I grossed $32K. I brought home $25K. $4K went to income tax, $400 went to medicare, $1300 went to state taxes, and my own insurance expenses etc. etc. came to $1,200. I got took for $4K of my hard earned money and I don't recall getting ANY type of service or help from the federal gov't whatsoever. If anybody has some similiar #'s they would like to compare that would be cool, so we can all get a good idea of how bad we're getting FUCKED, OR not....
CspecRun is offline  
Old 01-06-2008, 03:00 PM
  #70  
1.5 BAR
 
johnmichael's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 719
Default Re: iowa

Originally Posted by random-strike
the "fair tax" is a sales tax. so you wouldn't automatically pay the same, and at least you would have a choice to pay or not.

like is said, its a step in a better direction, not the best thing...
how is it a step in the right direction if i end up paying the same amount to a different agency?
johnmichael is offline  


Quick Reply: iowa



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:46 PM.