I'm on a boat.
|
Re: I'm on a boat.
Boats and hoes.
|
Re: I'm on a boat.
There are just some things that ------- crackers shouldn't do...that's on of them. :3
|
Re: I'm on a boat.
Crackers aren't allowed to be on boats, Adam? Uhm... most of us can swim until out nubian brothers. ???
|
Re: I'm on a boat.
Originally Posted by Joseph Davis
Crackers aren't allowed to be on boats, Adam? Uhm... most of us can swim until out nubian brothers. ???
|
Re: I'm on a boat.
I stand corrected, sir.
|
Re: I'm on a boat.
Originally Posted by Tough-guy
There are just some things that ------- crackers shouldn't do...that's on of them. :3
O0 Take a good hard look at the ----------in' boat. |
Re: I'm on a boat.
Ok...it's a really nice pleasure craft but is there something I'm missing. The dollar amount of the boat does not excuse the fact that those kids are not talented nor should they be rapping in a (an apparent) spoof video. The high dollar production value is not a cover for blatant fail.
|
Re: I'm on a boat.
That's not that high dollar. My friends who just got out of film school can make ---- that looks like that with 10-20k worth of cameras. Welcome to the computer age. Also, it's funny. Suck it.
|
Re: I'm on a boat.
Originally Posted by rawr
That's not that high dollar. My friends who just got out of film school can make ---- that looks like that with 10-20k worth of cameras. Welcome to the computer age. Also, it's funny. Suck it.
|
Re: I'm on a boat.
Welcome to change.
|
Re: I'm on a boat.
P.S. people say fail IRL now so it's totally unacceptable to use on the internet.
|
Re: I'm on a boat.
Originally Posted by rawr
P.S. people say fail IRL now so it's totally unacceptable to use on the internet.
Fail |
Re: I'm on a boat.
its funny have never seen that before .wat was the name of the movie that dude played in were hes a dare devil and rides the moped?? that ---- was funny as ---- watched it stoned off my ass...good times :6
|
Re: I'm on a boat.
Originally Posted by Tough-guy
ZOMG thanks for the update AND the shitty video.
Fail |
Re: I'm on a boat.
Originally Posted by rawr
Go ---- your overly hostile self in your black sized ass with your white sized dick.
|
Re: I'm on a boat.
Quit trying to put yourself in position of hostility in order to gain status over that of myself using nothing but arbitrary pretense and subjective reasoning, fag.
|
Re: I'm on a boat.
Originally Posted by rawr
Quit trying to put yourself in position of hostility in order to gain status over that of myself using nothing but arbitrary pretense and subjective reasoning, fag.
|
Re: I'm on a boat.
Careful tough gay. Caleb gets his kicks by beating up old drunk people. He's not one to be trifled with. .
|
Re: I'm on a boat.
Originally Posted by fysh
Careful tough gay. Caleb gets his kicks by beating up old drunk people. He's not one to be trifled with. .
Both of you can GTFO and go spoon with each other somewhere else. You blatant faggotry is frowned upon. |
Re: I'm on a boat.
Drop it, Adam. You're just going to make yourself look like a dildo in the long run. I'm trying to be slightly cordial.
|
Re: I'm on a boat.
Originally Posted by rawr
Drop it, Adam. You're just going to make yourself look like a dildo in the long run. I'm trying to be slightly cordial.
That video sucks geriatric cat ----, thanks for wasting my time. |
Re: I'm on a boat.
First, I'm not the one reacting to your posting. You're reacting to mine. Which means that much to your chagrin, I'm controlling the situation. I offered a remedy to the situation, you denied it. Granted, it wasn't a very friendly settlement, but this is HMT and I'm not going to subvert myself to comforting you in order to make amends. Furthermore, if you don't care for the video, don't post in the thread. I'm not saying you can't criticize something you don't like, but it's obvious that you're just intending it to defame me, rather than criticizing the content. You're setting yourself up for a fall if you think arguing withing the former guidelines of HMT e-thuggery is going to cut it.
|
Re: I'm on a boat.
|
Re: I'm on a boat.
Originally Posted by rawr
First, I'm not the one reacting to your posting. You're reacting to mine. Which means that much to your chagrin, I'm controlling the situation. I offered a remedy to the situation, you denied it. Granted, it wasn't a very friendly settlement, but this is HMT and I'm not going to subvert myself to comforting you in order to make amends. Furthermore, if you don't care for the video, don't post in the thread. I'm not saying you can't criticize something you don't like, but it's obvious that you're just intending it to defame me, rather than criticizing the content. You're setting yourself up for a fall if you think arguing withing the former guidelines of HMT e-thuggery is going to cut it.
Wow, what a little midwest faggot. 1) You aren't controlling ---- cupcake. :3 2) "Offered to remedy the situation" WAT? You are escalating it faggot. Your new nick-name is Snowball. 3) I wasn't trying to defame you...you are not famous. Get over yourself. 4) "Setting my self up for a fall..." Who's E-thugging now Snowball? 5) What ethnicity/nationality are you? You brought up race to try to flame like that ---- hasn't been beaten to ------- death already. If that's a pic of you in your AV, you are crazy if you think you are making fun of anyone. Have a lovely day Snowball. :-* |
Re: I'm on a boat.
Please state something of substance in your premises because when you don't, you're arguing primarily off of meaningless points. When your premises don't have any substance, it's easy to make your argument look hollow to anyone with the ability to think logically. I brought up race first in the high life thread. OK. I was just poking at you because you were acting like an authority on an arbitrary subject that has an associated racial stigma attached to a good I happen to like and you took it too far. You brought it up first in this thread and you're continuing to make it an issue.
|
Re: I'm on a boat.
|
Re: I'm on a boat.
Originally Posted by rawr
Please state something of substance in your premises because when you don't, you're arguing primarily off of meaningless points. When your premises don't have any substance, it's easy to make your argument look hollow to anyone with the ability to think logically. I brought up race first in the high life thread. OK. I was just poking at you because you were acting like an authority on an arbitrary subject that has an associated racial stigma attached to a good I happen to like and you took it too far. You brought it up first in this thread and you're continuing to make it an issue.
|
Re: I'm on a boat.
Buk, make another thread about me. HMT would rather read that ----. ::)
Good job, Tough-gay. |
Re: I'm on a boat.
Originally Posted by Joseph Davis
Buk, make another thread about me. HMT would rather read that ----. ::)
Good job, Tough-gay. |
Re: I'm on a boat.
Originally Posted by Tough-guy
Re-read this statement, correct your grammatical errors, then preach to me about premises, substance, structure, logic, and syntax. ::)
The first statement is a simple if then (P -> Q) The second statement is the same substituting if with when and omitting then. The third sentence is a simple sentence with no logical connectives. The forth is an overly worded sentence using and as the logical connective that could have been tautologically correct if I had also written it like "It is not the case that if I was not just poking at you because you were acting like an authority on an arbitrary subject that has an associated racial stigma attached to a good I happen to like, then you took it too far. The fifth sentence could be written as such, also. The diagram for that is ~(~P->Q) I'll continue preaching to you about premises as that final argument is logically invalid. It is not the case that if there are inconsistencies in my delivery, that my statement is untrue. |
Re: I'm on a boat.
Originally Posted by rawr
Why don't you correct my grammatical errors.
The first statement is a simple if then (P -> Q) The second statement is the same substituting if with when and omitting then. The third sentence is a simple sentence with no logical connectives. The forth is an overly worded sentence using and as the logical connective that could have been tautologically correct if I had also written it like "It is not the case that if I was just poking at you because you were acting like an authority on an arbitrary subject that has an associated racial stigma attached to a good I happen to like, then you too it too far. The fifth sentence could be written as such, also. The diagram for that is ~(~P->Q) I'll continue preaching to you about premises as that final argument is logically invalid. It is not the case that if there are inconsistencies in my delivery, that my statement is untrue. |
Re: I'm on a boat.
Originally Posted by rawr
The diagram for that is
~(~P->Q) 8==============D jd prolly peed his pants a little reading this thread. he couldnt argue against caleb either 8) |
Re: I'm on a boat.
JD can argue with me, that's why our IM conversations are so contentious.
|
Re: I'm on a boat.
Better still ----> ( . )( . )
Or if they've push one out -----> ( o )( o ) |
Re: I'm on a boat.
|
Re: I'm on a boat.
Originally Posted by rawr
JD can argue with me, that's why our IM conversations are so contentious.
|
Re: I'm on a boat.
It's the inclusive or that you've got to watch out for.
|
Re: I'm on a boat.
I prefer boolean logic. It's not anywhere near simple once you start bitwise manipulations and left/right shifts, but at least (unlike your legalese inclusive or) it's honest.
|
Re: I'm on a boat.
You can't stop me "I'm on a boat" O0
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:15 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands