Help Cambodia....
12-05-2005, 07:51 PM
#171
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Re: Help Cambodia....
Originally Posted by buk9tp
Originally Posted by mycrx
double posted cause this pos aol feezes up, but no matter what i do, your still from arab land.
12-05-2005, 07:53 PM
#172
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,282
Re: Help Cambodia....
i was there for one year. egypt. my senior year high school. bleh.
and ive vacationed there before.....
dunecoon. heh. never heard that one before.
and ive vacationed there before.....
dunecoon. heh. never heard that one before.
12-05-2005, 07:58 PM
#173
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,282
Re: Help Cambodia....
sry. havent gotten that far yet johnny.
12-05-2005, 08:00 PM
#174
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Re: Help Cambodia....
arab countries didnt start ----. we started with them. do you really thing if we hadnt done what we did that we would be ruled by arab countries?
six-day war? israel is our ally...
irans new president is thought to be one of the terrorists who held the american guys hostage in Iran.
all these countries harbor and support terrorists, who have commited a huge number of terrorist attacks on the US and our allies.
The above statement is the only reason we need.
kuwait gives us oil. WHAT THE ---- does israel give us?
Israel is a trading partner, ally, key stable democracy in the middle east. many many more reasons...
bottom line is. the basis for the iraq war was found on a lie. or miscomunication. as was the vietnam war.
now 5.1 million dead viets.
and 67 thousand dead american soldiers later. were all like oops? my bad?
and 67 thousand dead american soldiers later. were all like oops? my bad?
i hope it wont take 67 thousand dead americans before we finally decide to buck the ---- up and suck in are guts and pull the ---- out of a country we have no buisness being in / stand nothing to gain from.
12-05-2005, 08:15 PM
#175
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,282
Re: Help Cambodia....
six day war : israel : uss liberty.
irans new president is thought to be one of the terrorists who held the american guys hostage in Iran.
no proof. doesnt mean jack ----. fact is. all iranians hate us. doesnt mean we can take em out.
and once again. thats IRAN. which is not like any other arab country.
harboring and supporting terrorist?
is that cause for a pre emptive strike?
iraeli democracy? oxymoron.
trading partner? i wudnt know. never really looked into it. but givinen all the billions in aid money. i dont think we gained a penny off of israel.
see. the thing is. iraq was obiding by un rules. but it was bening them from time to time. it allowed weapons inspectors after being retards about it. and they searched. and nothing came up. why the ---- didnt we wait till the un agreed to a war? that wouldnt have made us look like asses infront of the entire world.
i agree with a stable and democratic middle east benifiting the world. but like i said. it wont happend overnight. people need to calm the ---- down. the middle east is getting there. slowly. yet its progress. and its a snowball effect. its been going on for a long time. and its just happening faster and faster.
irans new president is thought to be one of the terrorists who held the american guys hostage in Iran.
no proof. doesnt mean jack ----. fact is. all iranians hate us. doesnt mean we can take em out.
and once again. thats IRAN. which is not like any other arab country.
harboring and supporting terrorist?
is that cause for a pre emptive strike?
iraeli democracy? oxymoron.
trading partner? i wudnt know. never really looked into it. but givinen all the billions in aid money. i dont think we gained a penny off of israel.
see. the thing is. iraq was obiding by un rules. but it was bening them from time to time. it allowed weapons inspectors after being retards about it. and they searched. and nothing came up. why the ---- didnt we wait till the un agreed to a war? that wouldnt have made us look like asses infront of the entire world.
i agree with a stable and democratic middle east benifiting the world. but like i said. it wont happend overnight. people need to calm the ---- down. the middle east is getting there. slowly. yet its progress. and its a snowball effect. its been going on for a long time. and its just happening faster and faster.
12-05-2005, 08:31 PM
#176
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Re: Help Cambodia....
Originally Posted by buk9tp
see. the thing is. iraq was obiding by un rules. but it was bening them from time to time. it allowed weapons inspectors after being retards about it. and they searched. and nothing came up. why the ---- didnt we wait till the un agreed to a war? that wouldnt have made us look like asses infront of the entire world.
they made 16 different resolutions, and didnt enforce any of them.
saddam had banned weapons, which is all we need to re-start the war.
he launched several SCUD missles at the begining of operation iraq freedom, which were banned via the cease-fire aggreement.
tailban afganistan harboring terrorists.. iran? syria?
harboring and supporting terrorist?
is that cause for a pre emptive strike?
is that cause for a pre emptive strike?
you're finally catching on, maybe we should wait until there is a mushroom cloud over chicago before we do anything.
12-05-2005, 08:34 PM
#177
!! UNCONFIRMED EMAIL !!
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,790
Re: Help Cambodia....
United Nations should stand for United ****'s thats pretty much what they r doing anyway. i say if its not our problem then dont make it.
12-05-2005, 08:54 PM
#178
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,282
Re: Help Cambodia....
Originally Posted by random-strike
Originally Posted by buk9tp
see. the thing is. iraq was obiding by un rules. but it was bening them from time to time. it allowed weapons inspectors after being retards about it. and they searched. and nothing came up. why the ---- didnt we wait till the un agreed to a war? that wouldnt have made us look like asses infront of the entire world.
they made 16 different resolutions, and didnt enforce any of them.
saddam had banned weapons, which is all we need to re-start the war.
he launched several SCUD missles at the begining of operation iraq freedom, which were banned via the cease-fire aggreement.
tailban afganistan harboring terrorists.. iran? syria?
harboring and supporting terrorist?
is that cause for a pre emptive strike?
is that cause for a pre emptive strike?
you're finally catching on, maybe we should wait until there is a mushroom cloud over chicago before we do anything.
now bombing every single one of his palaces/houses/bunkets with bunker busters. would have saved us alot of money. lives. and kept our credibility.
in your opinion. whose a greater threat? iraq? or korea?
how bout iran? and our so called ally russia... openly selling long range missles. weapons. and what not to iran. and its been prooven that they shared nuclear secrets?
his daddy almost got killed. bush put many american lives on the line to settle a personal problem.
saddam was a joke/still is.
they should have killed him when they found him. he wont be found guilty of jack ----. have u seen the latest court transcripts?
i dont think any terrorist has nuclear capabilities.
anthrax was a joke.
pre emptive strikes. if u have FACTS i would agree with that. but no going on gut feelings. or he said she said.
iraq was a pre emptive strike. that turned out to be useless. and caused more problems than it could have ever prevented.
12-05-2005, 09:21 PM
#179
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 0
Re: Help Cambodia....
Originally Posted by buk9tp
Originally Posted by random-strike
Originally Posted by buk9tp
see. the thing is. iraq was obiding by un rules. but it was bening them from time to time. it allowed weapons inspectors after being retards about it. and they searched. and nothing came up. why the ---- didnt we wait till the un agreed to a war? that wouldnt have made us look like asses infront of the entire world.
they made 16 different resolutions, and didnt enforce any of them.
saddam had banned weapons, which is all we need to re-start the war.
he launched several SCUD missles at the begining of operation iraq freedom, which were banned via the cease-fire aggreement.
tailban afganistan harboring terrorists.. iran? syria?
harboring and supporting terrorist?
is that cause for a pre emptive strike?
is that cause for a pre emptive strike?
you're finally catching on, maybe we should wait until there is a mushroom cloud over chicago before we do anything.
now bombing every single one of his palaces/houses/bunkets with bunker busters. would have saved us alot of money. lives. and kept our credibility.
in your opinion. whose a greater threat? iraq? or korea?
how bout iran? and our so called ally russia... openly selling long range missles. weapons. and what not to iran. and its been prooven that they shared nuclear secrets?
his daddy almost got killed. bush put many american lives on the line to settle a personal problem.
saddam was a joke/still is.
they should have killed him when they found him. he wont be found guilty of jack ----. have u seen the latest court transcripts?
i dont think any terrorist has nuclear capabilities.
anthrax was a joke.
pre emptive strikes. if u have FACTS i would agree with that. but no going on gut feelings. or he said she said.
iraq was a pre emptive strike. that turned out to be useless. and caused more problems than it could have ever prevented.
and now the idiot kid from where ever knows what is better for our country than all the men in washington (non-politicions) put together.
isolationism DOES NOT WORK.
study history
and you cannot just write off, blah SCUDS didnt do anything. because in the first gulf war SCUDS did kill a lot of people, i am not sure if they killed anyone in OIF.
saddamm will be found guilty obviously and he will be executed. he has no chance at all.
NK and IRAN and threats yes. whats your point? because they are bigger would should ignore all others threats?
12-05-2005, 09:22 PM
#180
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 0
Re: Help Cambodia....
Originally Posted by random-strike
the bottom line with saddam and iraq is that he attacked kuwait our ally and that got him on our bad guy list.
Saddamn was our buddy up until that point. Kuwait we had diplomatic relations with, but didn't care one way or the other. During the Iran-Iraq War, Kuwait encroached on Iraqi oil fields; either slant drilling or crossing the border and physically setting up derricks. Saddam contacted the US DOD and asked through the correct channels if *we* had any problems with him declaring war on Kuwait. Saddam did this because he was somebody's bitch, and knew it. April Glasby, Ambassador of the USA to Iraq, told good old Saddam that a little old war was "of no concern to the United States." So, Saddam crushes Kuwait like the little ****** country it is, and within 24 hours Bush Sr had mobilized the US military forces to attack Saddam.
Miss Glasby's statements were on the news for one evening - I remember watching it - and should be a matter of public record. Just because nobody bothered to tell you, I guess Saddam must have attacked Kuwait for not ------- reason whatsoever, huh?
