|
Re: Grindhouse
Originally Posted by thiggyperformance
I think you hit the nail on the head with that! I will not see a movie that is directed by Quentin Tarantino much less Robert Rodriguez. I think that most people nowadays are impressed with cinematography and forget the movie is supposed to tell a story not just special effects. Hell, if that is what you want you could do acid or shrooms and watch the world around you.
|
Re: Grindhouse
I saw it and planet terror was pretty good but death proof was fuggin drawnnnnnn out. But yes the machete trailor was ------- HILARIOUS and I couldnt stop laughing my ass off. "They fucked with the wrong mexican"
|
Re: Grindhouse
its the return of the b movie. how can people not like it. its a bummer it bombed at the box office but i'll see it when i get a chance
|
Re: Grindhouse
Originally Posted by thiggyperformance
I think you hit the nail on the head with that! I will not see a movie that is directed by Quentin Tarantino much less Robert Rodriguez. I think that most people nowadays are impressed with cinematography and forget the movie is supposed to tell a story not just special effects. Hell, if that is what you want you could do acid or shrooms and watch the world around you.
|
Re: Grindhouse
Originally Posted by fysh
Now im just confused... what unbelievable special effects did Resevoir Dogs or Pulp Fiction have? Kill Bill was mostly just a lot of blood. Sin City had quite a few, but nothing more than any other movie. Sure you aren't thinking of George Lucas? I think those directors tell a great story in a very unique way. It has nothing to do with effects. Cinematography, maybe. but just because its refreshingly different. they are both good writers and badass directors.
|
Re: Grindhouse
Originally Posted by thiggyperformance
I think you hit the nail on the head with that! I will not see a movie that is directed by Quentin Tarantino much less Robert Rodriguez. I think that most people nowadays are impressed with cinematography and forget the movie is supposed to tell a story not just special effects. Hell, if that is what you want you could do acid or shrooms and watch the world around you.
|
Re: Grindhouse
Originally Posted by fysh
Now im just confused... what unbelievable special effects did Resevoir Dogs or Pulp Fiction have? Kill Bill was mostly just a lot of blood. Sin City had quite a few, but nothing more than any other movie. Sure you aren't thinking of George Lucas? I think those directors tell a great story in a very unique way. It has nothing to do with effects. Cinematography, maybe. but just because its refreshingly different. they are both good writers and badass directors.
I am not saying he does not bring in the big bucks. I am sure that there are a few that can understand his off tangent thoughts but, not me. The special effects are just not blowing ---- up it could also include crosscutting. George Lucas on the other hand, most of his movies tell a story and and has great cinematography.
Originally Posted by Snafubmx234
So basically you think movies are stupid and we should all just read books? ::)
Originally Posted by rawr
not really :-\
|
Re: Grindhouse
I saw it. About 20 people left after the first movie. I wonder if they just didnt know that it was a double feature.
|
Re: Grindhouse
Cody, don't point the gun at yourself, okay?
|
Re: Grindhouse
Originally Posted by thiggyperformance
It is just the way that Quentin crosscuts the movies together the baffles me.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:52 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands