|
Re: this is funny...
Originally Posted by fe3tcourier
no, that makes it two stroke ;-) much like a 1.3 rota box performs like a 2.6 piston engine...
..enter Frank any second. |
Re: this is funny...
that doesnt ever have to idle? and is cammed only to spin 12k rpm? etc. etc...
why get touchy and sensitive and sound as you lot frequently put it "butt hurt"? why not just accept that there is more than one way to skin a cat? i've never owned a honda, i've driven a few, i dont have a login on any honda website, i dont want one. just concede that the build on jap cars is of a higher quality, and that smaller engines can produce as much hp with equal reliability with boost (as this site is all about) and call it quits... good idea? i think so. you posted this link just as a teaser most likely... so i thought i'd give you what you want. do you realise that each time you bag non v8 setups that you bag 95% of the users on this site? do you care? your mates are all watching, finding it amusing that you are having a go at me. thats fair enough. i find it amusing too. meanwhile you keep saying that pushrods are the only way. well, theres some news for you, its not the ONLY way, its a viable and good alternative with many upsides. of course a rotary is not a two stroke, though it shares some features and behaviours... |
Re: this is funny...
Originally Posted by fe3tcourier
that doesnt ever have to idle? and is cammed only to spin 12k rpm? etc. etc...
why get touchy and sensitive and sound as you lot frequently put it "butt hurt"? why not just accept that there is more than one way to skin a cat? i've never owned a honda, i've driven a few, i dont have a login on any honda website, i dont want one. just concede that the build on jap cars is of a higher quality, and that smaller engines can produce as much hp with equal reliability with boost (as this site is all about) and call it quits... good idea? i think so. you posted this link just as a teaser most likely... so i thought i'd give you what you want. do you realise that each time you bag non v8 setups that you bag 95% of the users on this site? do you care? your mates are all watching, finding it amusing that you are having a go at me. thats fair enough. i find it amusing too. meanwhile you keep saying that pushrods are the only way. well, theres some news for you, its not the ONLY way, its a viable and good alternative with many upsides. of course a rotary is not a two stroke, though it shares some features and behaviours... you're the one who comes in here like a queer ass faggot eurotrash homosexual and spouts off your normally cock filled mouth about how d15b motors are better than a ls7 because they make 90hp out of 1.5l and the ls7 "only" makes 505 out of 7 i have owned many hondas, and imports. turbocharged, swapped, and the like... reality is reality. no turbo honda at 505hp is going to be as reliable as a stock ls7 motor and anyone who says different is retarded at best. |
Re: this is funny...
Originally Posted by fe3tcourier
of course a rotary is not a two stroke, though it shares some features and behaviours...
|
Re: this is funny...
my quad is a 4 poke and it makes 71hp/l
if i had a c6 z06 i would swap it in definatly. might even gain me a few points on the technology dyno |
Re: this is funny...
a turbo nsx at 12psi making 500 crank hp would be reliable IF it was built right. you can guarantee that. how about a toyotas, how about a 5l mill with no boost making 500hp, hows that? such an engine doesnt roll off the showroom floor (see 280hp limit) but it could be built from their v12 without too much hassle. its no big deal to make 100hp per litre. there is no excuse for GM if you ask me. the later ford V8s have 4 cams, and make more respectable numbers for their size, things are looking up for the american car makers credibility.
you speak of ls1s like they are infallible. in reality they are not, there were a LOT of warranty claims on engines in the commodores with ls1s in em. not up to the task when really held to it. have you got what ever it is thats on your mind out yet? 11 posts to my 3 before hitting the go button on this one. perhaps sit back and enjoy a beer instead of trying your hardest to have a heart attack... |
Re: this is funny...
Originally Posted by fe3tcourier
a turbo nsx at 12psi making 500 crank hp would be reliable IF it was built right. you can guarantee that. how about a toyotas, how about a 5l mill with no boost making 500hp, hows that? such an engine doesnt roll off the showroom floor (see 280hp limit) but it could be built from their v12 without too much hassle. its no big deal to make 100hp per litre. there is no excuse for GM if you ask me. the later ford V8s have 4 cams, and make more respectable numbers for their size, things are looking up for the american car makers credibility.
you speak of ls1s like they are infallible. in reality they are not, there were a LOT of warranty claims on engines in the commodores with ls1s in em. not up to the task when really held to it. have you got what ever it is thats on your mind out yet? 11 posts to my 3 before hitting the go button on this one. perhaps sit back and enjoy a beer instead of trying your hardest to have a heart attack... i love the ricer ifs and coulds. will that 5l 500hp engine power the car its in to 30mpg? will it have 475ft-lbs of torque? the 4.6l engines (without the blower) in the mustangs are gigantic heaps of ---- compared to ls1s stock for stock and mod for mod. worse mileage, less torque, more weight, respond worse to mods, need i say more. the 4.6l mod motors are good motors, just not as a good as lsx motors. there are a lot of warranty claims on every car/motor ever made ahh yes the 280hp limit, the greatest ricer excuse of them all. ls1, ls2, ls3, ls6, ls7 > YOU :-* |
Re: this is funny...
|
Re: this is funny...
|
Re: this is funny...
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:10 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands