|
Re:Four more years of War
it is true only if it is a Real war.
where we get attack and fight back and stuff. but this is not what`s going on. |
Re:Four more years of War
Over 500 people a year die from choking on food. So join a safe eating committee. ::)
Choking on food, dying fighting in a war to preserve our way of life. Who's death is more meaningless? ::) |
Re:Four more years of War
it is meaningless if you are fighting and dying for no ----., it is not a war, it means nothing to those who died.
We did got attacked once, and there`s not even enough reason to prove they are the one who did it. nor there`s enough reason to prove that THEY are threat to our nation. According to what i heard from bush on TV the other day, he even made it sound like we are ~~pround~~ to be the ~~HERO~~ to help them to re-gain their freedom. who ------- cares about OTHERS freedom. :-\ i just don`t understand why ppl are stupid enough to blow up one places then rebuild it FOR THEM, while spending OUR $$. chocking VS war. you are the man Steve. ::) |
Re:Four more years of War
Donald, everybody knows that we can't bomb somewhere and not help the "poor regular people" rebuild it. If we didn't you'd be crying about the mess we left those people to live in. That's just political correctness for you. I wish we could bomb a joint and not rebuild ----, but it's not going to happen.
And the people that have died already was far from meaningless. Forget about 9/11. It's not about WHO attacked us, it's about going around and taking out people that would like to/ could if they wanted. Next time you lay in bed and can't sleep, it won't be because your afraid of Saddam bombing your house. I guess that's not worth it. :P I guess I am the man. Lives are lives. Over 500 are lost a year from people choking on food, but you never even thought about them. Instead you wanna bitch about the people dying to secure your freedom. Is it about loss of life, or is it about how you dont' think we should be at war? The people that died choking didn't do anything to help you sleep at night. ;) |
Re:Four more years of War
There a difference between an accidental death and sending troops to die. I was never worried about Saddam bombing my house so its not like invading Iraq made our country any safer.
|
Re:Four more years of War
Yes, there is a difference in accedental death and dying in a war. One you were fighting for a cause, and one you were fighting a cheeseburger. Which one is more meaningless?
Whitey, I bet you never thought Stealthmode would shoot up your house at 935 this Sunday night either. :P |
Re:Four more years of War
Originally Posted by Stealthmode
Donald, everybody knows that we can't bomb somewhere and not help the "poor regular people" rebuild it. If we didn't you'd be crying about the mess we left those people to live in. That's just political correctness for you. I wish we could bomb a joint and not rebuild ----, but it's not going to happen.
And the people that have died already was far from meaningless. Forget about 9/11. It's not about WHO attacked us, it's about going around and taking out people that would like to/ could if they wanted. Next time you lay in bed and can't sleep, it won't be because your afraid of Saddam bombing your house. I guess that's not worth it. :P I guess I am the man. Lives are lives. Over 500 are lost a year from people choking on food, but you never even thought about them. Instead you wanna bitch about the people dying to secure your freedom. Is it about loss of life, or is it about how you dont' think we should be at war? The people that died choking didn't do anything to help you sleep at night. ;) |
Re:Four more years of War
Originally Posted by Stealthmode
Whitey, I bet you never thought Stealthmode would shoot up your house at 935 this Sunday night either. :P
Don't worry, I'll be waving to you :-* http://handguns.g00net.org/Israel/I_de-flame.jpg |
Re:Four more years of War
Originally Posted by Whitey
Originally Posted by prelude9384
I thought the percent that voted for Hitler was 33% or around there, I don't remember it being an overwhelming majority. But I could be wrong. The way Hitler got so powerful was that he used a certain law that pretty gave all authority to him after he was legally elected. Keep in mind this was from Germany's democratic constitution. Then short after the Riechstag(think that was the name), Germany's parliment building was abolished.
Yeah I kinda did exaggerate, It was about 38%. They didn't have enough votes needed to change the constitution. Germany was a undergoing major changes during this time which was enabled him to become as powerful as he did. And as for the Riechstag being abolished do you mean burned? The Riechstag was burned (most likely by Hitler's Waffen SS) it was deemed as a national tragedy. Hitler used this event and exploited it to pass a law to suspend the rights of citizens (not anything similar to the patriot act ;)). The quickly blamed it on the communists and eliminated his political opposition with it. Isn't it kinda erie how history repeats itself? Hitler used a tragedy like burning of the Riechstag to exploit his agenda just like how Bush uses 9/11 as an exuse for him to execute his agenda? |
Re:Four more years of War
Originally Posted by SinisterCRX
Originally Posted by beerbongskickass
If I was president there would be peace on earth or I would kill you. Why the ---- do we have all these nukes if were not going to use them. Pull the troops out and start bombing everybody.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:11 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands