Re:Election 2004
 

Bush is just trying to make it seem he's controlling the terrorists, huh? You didn't happen to see that saddam in a hole video, did ya? Turning violent leaders into hiding cowards is also translated into "controlling"
Weapons or no weapons, the world is now a little better without saddam. (go ahead and say no to that one) ;)

Your friends didn't fight in a war based on fabrication of truth. If the CIA doesn't have the right information, that wouldn't be "fabrication of truth" on the presidents part. That would be the president getting wrong information, and acting in YOUR best interest based on that wrong information.:o But all of a sudden since nobody actually found the weapons, you hate the "fact?" ??? (The president fabicating the truth is only a fact in your head)

I have a friend over in Iraq right now. I don't "personally" feel anything. I'm here at my house. What could possibly effect me "personally" about my friend being there? People join the military knowing that killing people, and going to war is one of the main functions of thier job. It's not a government run babysitting program.

Re:Election 2004
 

I really think that Bush is going to lose with all this comotion about him being in the Air National Guard. I dont know about Kerry really...But i do think that he is going to win to represent the Democrats and then win the President election in November.

Re:Election 2004
 

i vote for no emissions, legal drinking age of 16, and obd0 for every new car released in the next 20 years.

Re:Election 2004
 

::)

Re:Election 2004
 

i dont see any reason to vote. lemme see... do i vote for this fuckhead, or this one? not only that, but the popular vote doesn't mean ----, its the electoral vote that counts. im tired of hearing "get out and vote." why?

Re:Election 2004
 

Bush is a ------- moron. As for the war in Iraq, one word, Halliburton. The biggest money making oil contract in the history of the universe went to this company and who is the CEO of this company? Dick Chaney the vice president.

Re:Election 2004
 

Edit

Re:Election 2004
 

This is how political parties try to pursuade voters to vote a certain way. Now you have people that will vote against bush because of some fictional story that the other party threw out. That story hasn't been proved to be fact by anyone, yet now people are thinking about what they say Bush did 30 years ago, even though we all have a first hand look at what kind of president he will be (the last 4 years ;)) The other candidates have yet to convince people what kind of president they will be. It doesn't make much sense seeing how Bush is showing us what kind of president he is going to be.

Re:Election 2004
 

bush will win end of disscussion

Re:Election 2004
 

Whether or not he will win depends on who votes for him. I would have to say that I am pissed off that he sent us to Iraq, even more so now that we didn't find anything. The point is that our soldiers died protecting us from nothing, the nothing that we didn't find in Iraq. Saddam Hussein had no power, he was a figure head and hasn't been making decisions for the country in a while. I fail to see how Iraq had anything to do with terrorism. GW just had to finish his Daddy's war that his father failed to 14 years ago.