Re: Which car are more durable?
for overall reliability i would go focus. they can be pretty fun too.
if your just ------- around with it get an older neon. light as ---- and you can make them handle with a little work |
Re: Which car are more durable?
Nice, then most preffer Focus. I have a friend that have a Focus for around 2 years witn any problems, but i also heard some other people that says focus suck ass.
|
Re: Which car are more durable?
Focus have a variant of the Mazda B engine = billet/forged crank and an iron block [sic].
The only problems they have occasionally/regularly are electrical, i.e. ignition things. Tranny is a Mazda unit as well I believe, gearing not unlike the old Kias. |
Re: Which car are more durable?
Why not just a cheap as EK?
|
Re: Which car are more durable?
I didn't see your mom's o-ring on the list?
|
Re: Which car are more durable?
Originally Posted by hard2obtain
but i also heard some other people that says focus suck ass.
|
Re: Which car are more durable?
both are pices of ---- civic FTW, ps have you seen the ford commercial where they advertise "now a ford is just as reliable as a Toyota"
|
Re: Which car are more durable?
Originally Posted by MR_T
both are pices of ---- civic FTW, ps have you seen the ford commercial where they advertise "now a ford is just as reliable as a Toyota"
|
Re: Which car are more durable?
At least you dont have a cavy as a option :X
|
Re: Which car are more durable?
I`ve driven both and If i had to choose I`d pick the focus.
As a DD I`d get the 2.0 push rod engine, its pretty peppy for what it is, enough low end power around tow.The ride is more cushioned then the neon, yet it handles pretty good for what it is that it actually surprised me. But within the price range I`d buy a corolla instead, they are better car over all and the least likely to break down. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:29 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands