buk9tp

they only found one engine at the pentagon and theyve identified that engine from a military air craft i forgot what it was called.. eitherway.. its clear that engine isnt from a 747

check out this awesome m16 clip

www.cmmginc.com/vids/M16_Vid_Ad.mpg

90dx

Buk just let it go.You will not get anywhere with this arguing with Random Strike.

J-SMITH69

what about all the people who died on the plane?

what about all the people who saw the plane crash into the building?

if there was anyone who saw a military plane or a missile hit the pentagon someone would say something.

LOTS of people said they saw a commerical plane do it, that plane has dissapeared, all the people aboard it are gone, GGGGGEEEEE i WUNDER WAT HAPPUNED :1

jecu

either way, there are still alot of unanswered questions

J-SMITH69

The first hoax about Flight 93 was that the phone calls from the passengers to their relatives were faked. These calls told the passengers about the WTC crashes, who then decided to attack the hijackers. Ignoring the reality that modern planes have "air phones" that explicitly are designed to work on planes, the evidence for "no cell phone calls are possible" is ambiguous at best. The website physics911 seems to be the source for these claims, which were concocted by a Canadian physicist who staged an experiment to replicate cell-phone reception in a small plane flying in Canada. A real experiment to prove the calls could not have been made would have needed to replicate the locations and altitudes in the United States (since cell phone reception is completely dependent on location). Physics911 also pushes the no plane hit Pentagon hoax and has promoted the "pod."

While it is true that fake audio and video can be created with sophisticated software systems, this is probably the meme most calculated to alienate "9/11 researchers" from the family members. It is unlikely that a spouse would not know they were having a phone conversation with their partner, and the extra complication to the operation makes this theory one of the least credible. There is enough provable evidence of official complicity without claiming that 9/11 family members really didn't talk with their loved ones on the phone - at least for those sincerely interested in the truth.

Physics911 also promoted a science fiction story claiming that the passengers from all four planes were all brought to a single site (a secret military base) and then all relocated to a single plane, which was then crashed to dispose of the evidence. This fantasy has zero evidence for it. It would have massively complicated the operation for no benefit. It is likely that the only "plane swap" that happened was tampering with the navigation system to ensure the "success" of the attacks, not any substitution of one plane for another.

J-SMITH69

J-SMITH69

J-SMITH69

J-SMITH69

taken immediately after the crash by a passing motorist (who had a clear view of the plane). Note the width of the area covered by fire (which shows that something as WIDE as a jet hit the building). None of the people who had a good view of the crash saw a cruise missile.

[img width=800]http://www.oilempire.us/graphics/pentagon-fire-width.jpg[/img]

J-SMITH69

he "Pentagon Lawn" claim

Several websites have claimed that photos show a debris free lawn in front of the Pentagon, and therefore this proves major anomalies in the attack. However, those sites generally show either photos taken long after the fire has been extinguished or photos that show signs of having been digitally altered.