IC placement
#22
Re: IC placement
Originally Posted by bitchasscracker
any intercooler is better than non at all so use what you got
I don't know what the undercarriage of your car looks like, but maybe getting the 90* on the IC cut and welded back on but rotated 180* would make running charge piping alot easier.
#23
Re: IC placement
Originally Posted by eshaw
Why bother having an IC if it's not getting enough air to work properly? I care, my engine cares, and my wallet/bank account cares.
PPl ------- throw those things away. Ive seen em make like 450+hp on a crap dynojet, so i think youd be square with that...
Dsm sidemounts suck. Been there. Done that.
#25
Re: IC placement
Originally Posted by Grande Rojo
+1
I don't know what the undercarriage of your car looks like, but maybe getting the 90* on the IC cut and welded back on but rotated 180* would make running charge piping alot easier.
I don't know what the undercarriage of your car looks like, but maybe getting the 90* on the IC cut and welded back on but rotated 180* would make running charge piping alot easier.
#26
Re: IC placement
Originally Posted by Hitchhikkr
Mk3 supra stock ic= cheap effective front mount. Fits perfect on my CRX.
PPl ------- throw those things away. Ive seen em make like 450+hp on a crap dynojet, so i think youd be square with that...
Dsm sidemounts suck. Been there. Done that.
PPl ------- throw those things away. Ive seen em make like 450+hp on a crap dynojet, so i think youd be square with that...
Dsm sidemounts suck. Been there. Done that.
#28
Re: IC placement
Originally Posted by Zxc4
put the sidemount in the front :P
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post