Forced Induction Custom FI Setup Questions

CRX-T v2.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 4, 2007 | 10:03 PM
  #21  
CRXDrew's Avatar
Thread Starter
1.5 BAR
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 892
Default Re: CRX-T 2.0

Originally Posted by Joseph Davis
I think it means v2.0
ahh... i'll change title :P
Old Feb 4, 2007 | 10:07 PM
  #22  
boosted 00 black si's Avatar
0.0 BAR
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 0
Default Re: CRX-T v2.0

i like the way the wastegate is.
Old Feb 5, 2007 | 12:48 AM
  #23  
90dx's Avatar
3.0 BAR
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,027
Default Re: CRX-T v2.0

**** build Ripper vids asap
Old Feb 5, 2007 | 01:55 AM
  #24  
HiProfile's Avatar
1.5 BAR
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 723
Default Re: CRX-T v2.0

----, reminds me of my sedan. Nearly the same chargepipe routing, and almost the same size turbo (s-trim) - 10psi by 4k. Of course JD didn't approve of that one. BTW any idea on CFM of that turbo? I'd assume ~500-550 if its the hx35's 'little brother', esp having a small housing on it, but I just can't find the right info, google is being a bitch.

The only thing that sucks about spooling that quick at low psi... you know the turbo has so much more. Its like blowing your load on her face, but not letting her savor it by wiping it off right away .

BTW is that a stock xmember, notched for 3" DP? I still haven't redone my innovative to side the rad properly, may never though.
Old Feb 5, 2007 | 02:58 AM
  #25  
CRXDrew's Avatar
Thread Starter
1.5 BAR
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 892
Default Re: CRX-T v2.0

Originally Posted by HiProfile
----, reminds me of my sedan. Nearly the same chargepipe routing, and almost the same size turbo (s-trim) - 10psi by 4k. Of course JD didn't approve of that one. BTW any idea on CFM of that turbo? I'd assume ~500-550 if its the hx35's 'little brother', esp having a small housing on it, but I just can't find the right info, google is being a bitch.

The only thing that sucks about spooling that quick at low psi... you know the turbo has so much more. Its like blowing your load on her face, but not letting her savor it by wiping it off right away .

BTW is that a stock xmember, notched for 3" DP? I still haven't redone my innovative to side the rad properly, may never though.
-I'd assume the same thing about the H1C. Its not really the little brother... more like the older brother. The HX35 has slightly more efficient wheel design. So I would say CFM-wise its just a lil less than the HX35.

-I don't really get the fast spool/jizz analogy. Its not as if the turbo runs out of steam.

-Stock crossmember notched. front trans mount removed (poly inserts all around). I notched the crossmember and reboxed/welded it all closed. I pretty much replaced 3 or 4 welds 1 inch apart with a solid bead of weld. Maybe stronger than stock? I can't say for sure. Notched it in such a way that the stock member also held the civic half radiator perfectly. All at the cost of free to me.
Old Feb 5, 2007 | 06:49 AM
  #26  
Tom-Guy's Avatar
0.0 BAR
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 0
Default Re: CRX-T v2.0

Originally Posted by HiProfile
----, reminds me of my sedan. Nearly the same chargepipe routing, and almost the same size turbo (s-trim) - 10psi by 4k. Of course JD didn't approve of that one.
What the hell are you babbling on about? An S-trim (compressor cover) on a T4 CHRA is not the same size as H1C, and there isn't any other way to route charge piping on an ED chassis with a turbo that large short of a backdoor IC or holesawing the frame rail and passing the charge pipe through there.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AgentMurdoc
Turbo Parts For Sale
9
Jul 19, 2004 10:37 PM
iNetForce
Turbo Parts For Sale
8
Jul 5, 2004 11:24 AM
jam4484
Wanted
8
Nov 17, 2003 08:12 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:35 AM.