crower stage 1 cams
i got a set of these for free 8).. i was going to put them in my b16 turbo but not sure dose any one have experence with these in a b16 turbo? i went to the crower web site and they are a bit bigger than a type r cams
here are the specs from crower let me know what u think. Part# Description Advertised Duration Duration @ .050" Gross Lift w/1.55 Stock Specs from Civic Si (B16A2) Int- 284 mid Exh-282 mid Int- 224 mid Exh-220 mid Int- 412 mid Exh-379 mid Stock Specs from GSR (B18C1) Int- 290 mid Exh-292 mid Int- 236 mid Exh-224 mid Int- 423 mid Exh-378 mid Stock Specs from Civic Type R (JDM Spec B16B) Int- 294 mid Exh-305 mid Int- 240 mid Exh-232 mid Int- 447 mid Exh-416 mid 63401-2 Stage 1 Performance oriented street use. CTR+ profile that will work with Type R valve springs. Also works with mild turbo. RPM Range: Idle to 8500+ 14+ hp over B18C Int- 296 mid Exh-306 mid Int- 242 mid Exh-234 mid Int- 449 mid Exh-418 mid |
Re: crower stage 1 cams
Those numbers are for lift...what's the degree of overlap? Overlap in some setups can be useful, such as on a log-style manifold that has little scavenging going on and can increase the scavenge effect. On most tubular manifolds overlap will end up robbing power.
Just a side note, I know you have to replace your springs and associated ---- in order to run those cams in your b16 (due to b16 spring coil bind). Might be other parts involved (such as valves if stems are longer on hype-r setups or gsr's) but I'll leave that to you to research. |
Re: crower stage 1 cams
i'm running a ramhorn manifold ..i just put itr valve springs and retainers in. let me see if i could find them numbers for the overlap
|
Re: crower stage 1 cams
Originally Posted by slo_crx1
Overlap in some setups can be useful, such as on a log-style manifold that has little scavenging going on and can increase the scavenge effect. On most tubular manifolds overlap will end up robbing power.
what would be better for vtec on a stock z6 log or horn |
Re: crower stage 1 cams
Originally Posted by Atticus
so how much over lap dose a stock cam have
what would be better for vtec on a stock z6 log or horn |
Re: crower stage 1 cams
slightly off topic: on the end of the cam with the part number.... is the "-2" there or no?
on topic...i will be putting bigger ones in my turbo B16A :-* |
Re: crower stage 1 cams
my boy is running the crower turbo cams, stage 2. these are some mean cams. vtec engages like wtf! I used the same cams for a month. they was some really great cams throughout the whole power band. especially 6500rpm - 9600rpm.
the stage ones are better that the ITR ones so you got a great deal for free. use them with no hestitaton. |
Re: crower stage 1 cams
Originally Posted by slo_crx1
Stock cams have a little bit of overlap, but not much. A ramhorn style manifold will scavenge much better than a log, but is it really going to be worth the price for a few extra hp on a stock motor? For the under 300hp just go with the tried and true log, much cheaper and who knows...maybe that little bit of overlap will help out after all.
plus its $50 more in bends and fabing time so i think its worth it |
Re: crower stage 1 cams
i email crower to ask them what the overlap was on the cams. they said the overlap is 22.5 degrees of overlap on the VTEC lobe
|
Re: crower stage 1 cams
The bigger the boost the more I like aggressive NA cams.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:18 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands