Forced Induction Custom FI Setup Questions

compound twin turbo's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-16-2007, 01:19 AM
  #11  
0.5 BAR
Thread Starter
 
stevecivic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 152
Default Re: compound twin turbo's

Originally Posted by PoweredT3A6
Complex...MY brain is not very complex...Turbo one wouldn't spool turbo 2...TURBO ONE WOULD HELP INCREASE POWER AND RPM UNTIL EXHAUST FLOW WOULD HAVE ENOUGH CFM TO SPOOL NUMBER 2...Sequential turbo setups are common for Diesels because of their reliance on boost for all of their power, also because to handle the amount of boost that you would be forced to accomodate with that setup. Imagine, the first turbo would be a Chrysler conquest turbo(tiny), on a GSR motor with LS tranny. Second turbo would be a larger trim T4 or a GT35r. The long gears, somewhat large displacement and capacity for RPM, would allow you to spool the t25 by 2000 rpm and it would reach maximum efficientcy by 5000. The T4 would spool by 4000 easily and reach maximum efficientcy by redline, therefore creating a sequential setup....BUT the problem would be...once the t25 got maxed out it would spin too fast and eat ---- after 2 days. So it becomes more complex and not so easy to do espescially on a high reving monster like a honda...remember diesels rev to 3k...


Thanks for the reply. Some twin turbo setups on dodges use the stock HX35 with max efficientcy by 34psi and a larger turbo with max efficientcy at around 80-100psi. So you are telling me that the hx35 will only last a few days? Some of these cummins are rumming close to 5000rpms and 100psi of boost. If you saw the pic i am not talking about sequential turbos like on the rx7's.
stevecivic is offline  
Old 04-16-2007, 01:21 AM
  #12  
0.0 BAR
 
lonestarion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 9
Default Re: compound twin turbo's

there is a difference between compound & twin tubo set up.
here it is.

twin turbos use exhaust to drive both turbo at the same time.

compound set up uses exhaust to drive a primary turbo, then uses the
cold side to drive the secondary turbo which feed the engine.

as far as anyone trying this, i havent heard of it yet. most people just blurt out
the same answer as above, not actualy knowing the difference or not
knowing there is a difference in set up. and to answer your question as to,
can it be done? sure it could be done. whould ther be a better gain over a TT setup?
or even a single turbo? dont know, but it might be possible. you just have
to get the combination dead on.
lonestarion is offline  
Old 04-16-2007, 01:31 AM
  #13  
WTF
3.0 BAR
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,057
Default Re: compound twin turbo's

WTF is offline  
Old 04-16-2007, 01:32 AM
  #14  
1.0 BAR
 
PoweredT3A6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 226
Default Re: compound twin turbo's

The pictured setup is not one compressor side driving another exhaust side! Same manifold is driving both turbos.
PoweredT3A6 is offline  
Old 04-16-2007, 01:37 AM
  #15  
1.0 BAR
 
PoweredT3A6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 226
Default Re: compound twin turbo's

If you look...the compressor out of the lower turbo is plumbed in to the intake side of the top one...that doesn't increase flow in the second really, it just needs to be linked through the same charge pipe so it goes through the larger turbo. Exhaust STILL drives both turbos...and...on the cummins, the first turbo would lose compression and bypass through a valve/flapper setup thats why it wouldn't spin to 5 gillion rpm and die in 2 days.
PoweredT3A6 is offline  
Old 04-16-2007, 01:40 AM
  #16  
1.0 BAR
 
PoweredT3A6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 226
Default Re: compound twin turbo's

And...efficiency would need to meet in the middle...like small turbo would need to lose eff at a certain boost/RPM that is closer to redline, but it would be okay for it to start to taper off sooner.
PoweredT3A6 is offline  
Old 04-16-2007, 01:47 AM
  #17  
1.0 BAR
 
aero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 311
Default Re: compound twin turbo's

Originally Posted by PoweredT3A6
If you look...the compressor out of the lower turbo is plumbed in to the intake side of the top one...that doesn't increase flow in the second really, it just needs to be linked through the same charge pipe so it goes through the larger turbo. Exhaust STILL drives both turbos...and...on the cummins, the first turbo would lose compression and bypass through a valve/flapper setup thats why it wouldn't spin to 5 gillion rpm and die in 2 days.
In the compound setups the turbo is not "bypassed". Air is compressed by the first stage, then compressed again by the second stage, then typically intercooled. The first turbo is the "low" pressure turbo and the larger of the two. The second turbo is the smaller or (high pressure) turbo, then flows through the intercooler.

The compound setups allow the use of pressure ratios far above what a single centrifugal compressor of practical size can reach, and also allow very good response.

There is no flapper that bypasses the smaller turbo.

aero is offline  
Old 04-16-2007, 01:53 AM
  #18  
1.0 BAR
 
PoweredT3A6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 226
Default Re: compound twin turbo's

Depends on how the unit was setup, like I said if you are using similar trim turbines then you would be fine...BUT if there was a drastic difference in trim, you would overrun the maximum rpm of the smaller wheel. I've worked on many-a-cummins.
PoweredT3A6 is offline  
Old 04-16-2007, 01:55 AM
  #19  
0.0 BAR
 
0b00st0's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 0
Default Re: compound twin turbo's

Originally Posted by lonestarion
twin turbos use exhaust to drive both turbo at the same time.

compound set up uses exhaust to drive a primary turbo, then uses the
cold side to drive the secondary turbo which feed the engine.
100% wrong. Both turbos are exhaust driven. The difference is that the smaller of the two is driven first. Then the output of that turbos exhaust drives the second larger turbo.

Now the secondary larger turbo's compressor feeds the primary smaller turbo. This is so that the first turbo is always working with out intake loss.

Now the way compounding works is that both turbos are set to have a pressure ratio of 2.5 or so. IT IS COMPOUNDING, meaning that you multiply them together to get the amount of boost going to the engine, so you have a pressure ratio of 6.25 (2.5 * 2.5). Boost seen by the engine will be (6.25 - 1) * 14.7 = 77psi.

Compressors are pressure multipliers, thats all.

The is the same effect as increasing the exducer size of the compressor wheel (lowering the trim). It moves the combined efficiency graph up and a little to the right giving you a slight increase in flow and retained efficiency at massive boost levels.

This technique is simply used to counteract the fact the turbos compressor is not very efficient at high pressure ratios.



0b00st0 is offline  
Old 04-16-2007, 01:57 AM
  #20  
1.0 BAR
 
PoweredT3A6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 226
Default Re: compound twin turbo's

Also, AERO you must be new and quoted that from another site...because you stated the obvious with most of your paragraph: "The first turbo is the "low" pressure turbo and the larger of the two. The second turbo is the smaller or (high pressure) turbo, then flows through the intercooler. [/color]

The compound setups allow the use of pressure ratios far above what a single centrifugal compressor of practical size can reach, and also allow very good response. "


LOL
PoweredT3A6 is offline  


Quick Reply: compound twin turbo's



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:55 AM.