Forced Induction Custom FI Setup Questions

call me crazy, turbo'd cutlass!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 7, 2009 | 04:16 AM
  #21  
janus's Avatar
0.0 BAR
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 22
From: Austria
Default

Originally Posted by 5G_4G15
before i moved it was'nt running though but there is parts out there. i can't remember who but some one makes cams for the 3.1
maybe this link helps? ARI Performance
Old Nov 7, 2009 | 09:21 PM
  #22  
5G_4G15's Avatar
0.5 BAR
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 58
Default

good link^.
Old Nov 11, 2009 | 05:00 AM
  #23  
TurboRiv's Avatar
0.0 BAR
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 22
Default

you shouldn't have to trick the map sensor. It only reads to one bar, so the computer won't be able to tell if its in boost. The maf on gm cars output a 5v squarewave instead of a voltage signal. There should be enough extra range in the sensor that you'll maxout the stock fuel pump before you max the sensor.

So it shouldn't need tricking, but if the maf does max the pcm throws a P0103(maf freq out of range hi), this will reduce the injector pulse width and make you go very lean. If you hit that, you need an maf interceptor, or fix it in the pcm.
Old Nov 12, 2009 | 03:22 AM
  #24  
reaper0101's Avatar
Thread Starter
0.0 BAR
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6
From: Indianapolis, IN
Default

haha, update again. i got a line on a bunch of free stuff, including blow off valve, engine and transmission tuning chips, oil pump, various other stuff. i now have the turbo down here with me, so all i need to do now is find time to take the pictures. well, i just got off work, so i'm heading to bed
Old Nov 12, 2009 | 04:57 AM
  #25  
TurboRiv's Avatar
0.0 BAR
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 22
Default

The turbo should be large enough. The 1990 factory 3.1 turbo (pontiac grand prix ste) used a garret t-25 with front mount IC.
It was only rated at 205hp, 225tq, but was almost 1 point lower conpression and based on older version of engine.
N/A of same year as turbo was rated 140hp, 1996 was rated 160hp.
Old Nov 12, 2009 | 03:58 PM
  #26  
AaronZ34's Avatar
0.5 BAR
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 166
Default

Originally Posted by TurboRiv
The turbo should be large enough. The 1990 factory 3.1 turbo (pontiac grand prix ste) used a garret t-25 with front mount IC.
It was only rated at 205hp, 225tq, but was almost 1 point lower conpression and based on older version of engine.
N/A of same year as turbo was rated 140hp, 1996 was rated 160hp.
That turbo was pretty much maxxed out at the 205hp it was making.
Old Nov 13, 2009 | 12:38 AM
  #27  
reaper0101's Avatar
Thread Starter
0.0 BAR
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6
From: Indianapolis, IN
Default

http://tinypic.com/r/rwta4y/4
http://tinypic.com/r/2lwwqcm/4
http://tinypic.com/r/2f07hoj/4
http://tinypic.com/r/288paq/4


i uploaded some pictures of the turbo and the intercooler. enjoy!!

Last edited by reaper0101; Nov 13, 2009 at 12:46 AM.
Old Nov 13, 2009 | 01:42 PM
  #28  
TurboRiv's Avatar
0.0 BAR
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 22
Default

When I said it should be big enough I didn't mean it would be a efficent fit, just usable.
It would be near maxed out also. there would only be about 20-30 more hp on the 96 motor then the the1990 had. The t-3 should flow enough more then the t25 for extra 20-30hp.
T-3 maps vary enough though that it may not or may flow more. If the specs on plate of turbo was posted could pull up compressor chart to see for sure.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mrcrx61832
Turbo Parts For Sale
30
Aug 18, 2007 09:14 PM
crx2fast
Hybrid/Tech
4
Jun 22, 2005 01:05 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:41 PM.