Forced Induction Custom FI Setup Questions

better head for boost...?Noob Q.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-07-2006, 02:34 AM
  #11  
1.0 BAR
Thread Starter
 
jundoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 640
Default Re: better head for boost...?Noob Q.

Originally Posted by slo_crx1
Pretty much...also don't forget the oversized type-r valves and beefed up valvetrain. I do like the gsr heads for their combustion chamber design...the cloverleaf helps for better flame propogation and such, but that's more or less something used by the all-motor crowd. Who needs efficiency when all a nog has to do is up the boost and re-tune :P
sounds good to me....
jundoc is offline  
Old 12-07-2006, 04:23 AM
  #12  
!! UNCONFIRMED EMAIL !!
 
turbohf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 6,656
Default Re: better head for boost...?Noob Q.

Originally Posted by slo_crx1
Pretty much...also don't forget the oversized type-r valves and beefed up valvetrain. I do like the gsr heads for their combustion chamber design...the cloverleaf helps for better flame propogation and such, but that's more or less something used by the all-motor crowd. Who needs efficiency when all a nog has to do is up the boost and re-tune :P
Type R valves are the same size... intakes are just under cut in the port area, i have a shitload of each if you want a pic



i have heard arguments for both heads...

the compression argument is gay though...aint much of ---- and shouldnt have a bearing on your decision...

this is what i came up with in my research (and others have agreed): run the one you get for free or close to that as possible...

on that note i have owned many heads and will be running a P72 head... got it for mad cheap, then bought an intake manifold for it already. so its the one im gonna use.
turbohf is offline  
Old 12-07-2006, 02:17 PM
  #13  
3.0 BAR
 
Walter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,057
Default Re: better head for boost...?Noob Q.

if you wanna to "oversize" the valves.. i will just do to exhaust (depending what setup yes).. in a boosted engine (honda).. the problem you have with valves is that them are made for NA setup.. so if you boost it the exhaust valves will have more problems than intake valves...









WTF? ive seen a ------- GSR turbo all stock makin +400 WHP...

Walter is offline  
Old 12-09-2006, 04:55 AM
  #14  
1.0 BAR
Thread Starter
 
jundoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 640
Default Re: better head for boost...?Noob Q.

thanks for all info....all will be helpful in decision making...its just that i got a pr3 head but could trade straight across for a p72...thats why i havent decided what to do ....
jundoc is offline  
Old 12-09-2006, 10:06 AM
  #15  
3.0 BAR
 
JDMFantasy2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,654
Default Re: better head for boost...?Noob Q.

the type r intake valves are lighter, and the spring rates of the intake springs are different to match the weight of the valves. Also the exhaust springs are double wound where they are single wound on a b16.
JDMFantasy2K is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dirtyDseries
Hybrid/Tech
5
11-06-2008 01:28 AM
dummee
General Discussion
12
07-26-2008 04:27 PM
sanjiyan69
Forced Induction
27
08-02-2006 11:07 PM
2stockrocketz
General Discussion
12
11-01-2005 05:39 PM



Quick Reply: better head for boost...?Noob Q.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:01 PM.