Forced Induction Custom FI Setup Questions

Anybody had any positive experiences with some cheap e-bay turbos?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-12-2007, 01:56 PM
  #31  
3.0 BAR
 
SDRAWKCAB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,349
Default Re: Anybody had any positive experiences with some cheap e-bay turbos?

you should always use a oil restrictor on turbos anyways its just good practice.

Right blaast?
SDRAWKCAB is offline  
Old 04-12-2007, 01:56 PM
  #32  
!! UNCONFIRMED EMAIL !!
 
1991civicsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,876
Default Re: Anybody had any positive experiences with some cheap e-bay turbos?

Thumbs up for Blaast.
My turbo from them is spooling and keeping me grinning.
1991civicsi is offline  
Old 04-12-2007, 04:51 PM
  #33  
1.5 BAR
 
BLAAST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 877
Default Re: Anybody had any positive experiences with some cheap e-bay turbos?

Originally Posted by SDRAWKCAB
you should always use a oil restrictor on turbos anyways its just good practice.

Right blaast?
Well t3 and t4 turbos needs very little oil. 10-20 psi is plenty.
On most automotive cars, oil pressure is like 60-80 ish. if you feed all that pressure through the turbo and it doesn't smoke, you're lucky. Even a brand new turbo on a honda with a 1/8" feed may smoke like crazy according to what i have seen! That's because the center section gets completely filled in with oil and overflows.
i have seen lots of leaking/smoking problems solved by adding the 1/16" restrictor and I never seen startvation problems caused by it. so really, you can'T go wrong.

Originally Posted by 1991civicsi
Thumbs up for Blaast.
My turbo from them is spooling and keeping me grinning.
You're happy = I'm happy.
BLAAST is offline  
Old 04-12-2007, 06:43 PM
  #35  
0.5 BAR
 
DirtydseriesWoot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 176
Default Re: Anybody had any positive experiences with some cheap e-bay turbos?

i used the 60.63 57 trim for a while on the last motor ran 12.3 @116 made 280whp never smoked worked great and still runs to this day by a local
DirtydseriesWoot is offline  
Old 04-12-2007, 07:50 PM
  #36  
1.5 BAR
 
BLAAST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 877
Default Re: Anybody had any positive experiences with some cheap e-bay turbos?

Originally Posted by jagojon3
Guess I'm lucky, my Garrett .48/.60 has never smoked and I don't use a restrictor.
Yes, quite possible, many things will help prevent oil leakage such as:
  • your engine has perfect compression
  • you are using a oil feed line that is small enough to serve as a restrictor by itself
  • You have a nice big, straight oil drain
  • You use proper oil such as 10-40 or 5-50, not the ------- 5-30 that is for atmospheric engines.
  • You have a top mount or otherwise High mounted turbo
  • Your feed hose is plugged to the head rather than the block, so you get less pressure but this is BAD for your engine.

Originally Posted by DirtydseriesWoot
i used the 60.63 57 trim for a while on the last motor ran 12.3 @116 made 280whp never smoked worked great and still runs to this day by a local
Were you using a restrictor? Does it come from me? sorry, don't remember.
BLAAST is offline  
Old 04-12-2007, 08:07 PM
  #37  
3.0 BAR
 
SDRAWKCAB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,349
Default Re: Anybody had any positive experiences with some cheap e-bay turbos?

so 10 w40 is better for a turbo then 10 w30
I thought the thicker oil create greater oil pressure?
I know it has a better heat break down capasity but it slows the rotating mass right?
just wondering
SDRAWKCAB is offline  
Old 04-12-2007, 08:16 PM
  #38  
1.5 BAR
 
BLAAST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 877
Default Re: Anybody had any positive experiences with some cheap e-bay turbos?

The first number is not very important as far as the turbo is concerned because the turbo quickly gets HOT and the viscosity at HIGH temperature is what you have to look for.
10-30 getts runny like water within the turbo. It breaks down quicker but most importantly, it doesn'T lubricate much, cooks into a harmfull crust inside the turbo and on the shaft and is more prone to leak out. And then, you return that soup to your engine..... And it stinks wheni rebuild your turbo.
5-50 is the best. it remains more viscous at higher temperatures, therfore maintains a good cooling and lubrication efficiency, slows down wear, and lasts longer.
not sure but i think 5-50 is available only in syntetic verson.
BLAAST is offline  
Old 04-12-2007, 10:55 PM
  #39  
wtg
0.5 BAR
 
wtg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 158
Default Re: Anybody had any positive experiences with some cheap e-bay turbos?

Originally Posted by StealthSi
I too have heard horror stories about the SSAC kits but i was also told that the FMIC are good. i scored a garrett A/R60 and thats what ill use for my kit, as far as the rest of the kit hmmmm i probably get it w/o the turbo.....
lol its kinda hard to ---- up a fmic its good as long as there arent any holes in it
wtg is offline  
Old 04-13-2007, 08:39 AM
  #40  
1.5 BAR
 
BLAAST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 877
Default Re: Anybody had any positive experiences with some cheap e-bay turbos?

i have here at my shop a pile of 5 chinese intercoolers of different sizes and "brands" with some the passes that have blown out. Some people have tried to temporarily fix the problem with epoxy glue (pretty). PAsses are just brazed together, which should normally be ok but apparently, chinese fabrication processes and quality control is as leaky as their intercoolers.
BLAAST is offline  


Quick Reply: Anybody had any positive experiences with some cheap e-bay turbos?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:16 PM.