98 eclipse gst question
#41
Re: 98 eclipse gst question
the t25 isnt staying on there. it is coming off withthe exhuast. not sure of how big were gonna go but it isnt gonna be to crazy. you people doubt that it can be done. all it takes is time and money. something we both have plenty of. im sorry its not gonna be held together by brakeclean cans and ducttape but its still gonna be a home built setup. so that sgould atleast count for something on this site.
#42
Re: 98 eclipse gst question
Originally Posted by 87c10slammer
the t25 isnt staying on there. it is coming off withthe exhuast. not sure of how big were gonna go but it isnt gonna be to crazy. you people doubt that it can be done. all it takes is time and money. something we both have plenty of. im sorry its not gonna be held together by brakeclean cans and ducttape but its still gonna be a home built setup. so that sgould atleast count for something on this site.
Way to take things out of context. Retard.
#44
Re: 98 eclipse gst question
DO us all a favor and just shut your trap! Stop talking ---- and just show us all how dumb we are. Now lets see this uber tiGhT DSM thats gona break in the next 3000 miles...
#45
Re: 98 eclipse gst question
everybodys was right you ricers are a bunch of s that need a ------ life. i come in here witha simple question. not to get flammed by some mammas boy. if you really wanna talk ---- i can do it all day. i hate your ------ cars. they all sound like a bunch of lawnmowers with coffee cans strapped to the exhaust. i prefere american muscle all day. i can tell you how many ricers i eat up in my fullsize chevy pick up that was around before half of you were born. ---- it was areond before me. ill smoke you on the drag strip then steal your girlfriends at the car show afterwards. stop talkin ---- cause you wont win. once agin this isnt directed to anyone that had anything decent to say and i apreciate your 2 cents
#47
Re: 98 eclipse gst question
some people just try to put other people down over some dumb ---- and i dont take it very kindly. so i just like to put people in there place before they come up with some other stupid *** remark. i more or less do it cause thats just how ---- goes
#49
Re: 98 eclipse gst question
Originally Posted by 87c10slammer
some people just try to put other people down over some dumb ---- and i dont take it very kindly. so i just like to put people in there place before they come up with some other stupid *** remark. i more or less do it cause thats just how ---- goes
#50
Re: 98 eclipse gst question
Originally Posted by crx2211
GM MAF and translator box FTL! Using a MAF to "tune" your car is a sure route to fail. If you love having a car that's impossible to get dialed in then I suppose the MAFT is an upgrade for you. You have to hack into your wiring harness to install the box. Not to mention you still have your stock ECU on all stock setting that you have to contend with, so trying to "trick" it with a MAF off a ------- Caprice is officially retarded. Yeah they had their moment back in 2002, but now there are way better alternatives. DSMLINK is simply awesome. Yes, it utilizes the stock ECU still, but it can compensate for larger injectors and has a ---- ton of variable that you can mess with. For $500 you can't get any better. The only problem for the OP who is obviously ; is that he still won't be able to vent his BOV with DSMLINK because it still uses the MAF. The only true way to vent the BOV with no ill effects is to swap over to AEM or a similar standalone, but that's out of the question for these guys. They can't even figure out ridiculously stupid issues, so installing a $1500 standalone and all accompanying sensors is not an option.
dsmlink does not offer speed density last time I checked
also the last time i checked the gm maf was still a better alternative to run with dsmlink of the stock karman votex unit.
the only true way to vent is to run aem or a some other true stand alone... do the board a favor and stick to b81c5 and ----.
if you are running the gmmaf on your upper pipe you can vent before the maf with no ill effect.
since the gm maf is 3" typically put on a 2.5 pipe.. not always but typically using bernoulli's principal the air would actually speed up through the maf creating a little better velocity into the i/m... take into consideration this is horribly insignificant yet does infact happen.
the irony of you calling me a knewb lol