Forced Induction Custom FI Setup Questions

35 vs 38 mm

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-02-2007, 08:36 PM
  #31  
3.0 BAR
 
Racintweek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,877
Default Re: 35 vs 38 mm

Originally Posted by Joseph Davis
Using the manifold design you espouse, a smaller turbine would create a larger average manifold pressure as the pressure-enthalpy conversion across the turbine would be less efficient.

Wastegate positioning does not take priority over turbine positioning. Even Corky Bell got that much right. Run both off a merge collector with nothing more divergent than a 35 degree divider, OMG YOU ARE SUPERIOR TO A LOG MANIFOLD.

i never mentioned a manifold design. i even said it doesnt matter what type of manifold. just as long as the WG and placement are correct is all that matters


a smaller turbine does make more mani pressure but if you have a WG that can release that excess pressure then you wont spike/choke the motor.
Racintweek is offline  
Old 08-02-2007, 10:28 PM
  #32  
1.0 BAR
 
iceracercrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 478
Default Re: 35 vs 38 mm

Wastegate is a important part to the puzzle. But not God of the manifold design. Please do the math on a former F1 car. 1.3 liters at 16,000 rpm and then you will know why they had small turbos with big wastegates.

Randy
PS I have a mid size turbo, with a mid size wastegate, with a mid range manifold, and guess what, it makes middle horsepower.
iceracercrx is offline  
Old 08-03-2007, 10:01 AM
  #33  
3.0 BAR
 
Racintweek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,877
Default Re: 35 vs 38 mm




i find it funny that some people think what makes a wastegate work and what it does isnt true



the 3 mechanical engineers that i work with are laughing right now
Racintweek is offline  
Old 08-03-2007, 12:30 PM
  #34  
0.0 BAR
 
Tom-Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 0
Default Re: 35 vs 38 mm

Originally Posted by Racintweek
i never mentioned a manifold design. i even said it doesnt matter what type of manifold. just as long as the WG and placement are correct is all that matters
Placement is design.

You are spouting Luke's feed the wastegate stick the tiny turbine off to the side manifold theory.

Placement.


Originally Posted by Racintweek
a smaller turbine does make more mani pressure but if you have a WG that can release that excess pressure then you wont spike/choke the motor.
A smaller turbine needs more pressure to do the same amount of work as a larger turbine. The wastegate is going to do ---- all to relieve excess pressure... all it is going to do is maintain the needed amount of exhaust pressure to acheive target intake pressure... which, for a smaller turbine setup, is a higher manifold pressure than a larger, more efficient turbine would need. That higher exhaust pressure is a loss.

If the small wastegate big turbine setups can't get rid excess turbine pressure, do you know what happens? It's called boost creep. If the system doesn't boost creep, there is no wastegate problem.


Originally Posted by Racintweek
the 3 mechanical engineers that i work with are laughing right now
I've had to tune and resort a couple cars for local MEs, on average they do shoddy work and don't know as much as they should. Engineering is 70% theory, which means a lot of engineers are real short on real-world experience to cockslap their theories. MEs are either idiots, talented with pen and paper, or ninjas. In my experience, 1 in 100 are ninjas, the rest I could do without.
Tom-Guy is offline  
Old 08-03-2007, 03:30 PM
  #35  
0.0 BAR
 
0b00st0's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 0
Default Re: 35 vs 38 mm

Originally Posted by iceracercrx
Wastegate is a important part to the puzzle. But not God of the manifold design. Please do the math on a former F1 car. 1.3 liters at 16,000 rpm and then you will know why they had small turbos with big wastegates.

That is not correct. F1 cars use HUGE wastegates and HUGE turbos. They used to be restricted to 2 psi of boost and had to rev to 18 grand to make the target 900 or so HP. A huge turbo is needed to flow enough for 900 HP. A HUGE wastegate is needed to bypass most of the exhaust energy since very little is being used across the turbine.

They couldn't keep the motors together long enough for a good race and it was pissing off the spectators, so they were allowed 6 psi of boost. Now they only needed to rev to 12k or so to make the same 900 HP. Now the motors last for mostly the whole season.



0b00st0 is offline  
Old 08-03-2007, 03:48 PM
  #36  
0.0 BAR
 
0b00st0's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 0
Default Re: 35 vs 38 mm

Originally Posted by Racintweek
for a 630hp drag car it doesnt matter where the wastegate is because peak power is whats important. when you are trying to maintain a flat torque curve from say 3000-7500 you need a turbo that spools well and a wastegate that can decrease manifold pressure to let the engine breathe up top.


even though your intake pressure stays the same through the RPMs exhaust mani pressure continues to rise which tries makes the turbine spin faster, unless you have a wastegate to relieve mani pressure. if you keep the exhaust manifold pressure relativly constant boost will remain constant because the force turning the turbine stays the same.

Just about everything you said right here is incorrect.

Peak power is not important. Domestics have proven that quite nicely by showing that the first 1/8th of the track is more important for low ETs than the last 1/8th. To get down the first half quickly, you need a responsive predictable torque curve, good traction, and the right amount of wheel spin.

Next, a large wastegate is worthless on a small turbo, especially with high boost. Most of the exhaust energy is going to be going through the turbine, NOT the WG.

Exhaust manifold pressure will always rise, because of the nature of compressors. To keep a constant pressure ratio, the compressor wheel MUST, I repeat MUST spin faster and faster. Look at a compressor graph. The speed lines take a dive down.

AND that last part you mentioned doesn't make a lick of sense unless you have a constant engine speed and a constant load. That will never happen throughout the RPM range.



0b00st0 is offline  
Old 08-04-2007, 04:53 PM
  #37  
1.0 BAR
 
iceracercrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 478
Default Re: 35 vs 38 mm

the 3 mechanical engineers that i work with are laughing right now

The 3 mechanical engineers that you work with are circle jerky right now, HAHAHHA
JD and I will agree 1 out of 100 are good the other 99 suck each others ***** during lunch.
iceracercrx is offline  
Old 08-04-2007, 05:18 PM
  #38  
1.0 BAR
 
losesomethinbra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 556
Default Re: 35 vs 38 mm

Shiiit since when are mechanical engineers experts on turbo setups?
losesomethinbra is offline  
Old 08-04-2007, 06:07 PM
  #39  
1.0 BAR
 
iceracercrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 478
Default Re: 35 vs 38 mm

The differences between most engineers and racers is,
1.Racer will always finsh the build sooner
2. Racer will always spend less money
3. Racer will always win!!!


Randy > doens't work with any engineers, I just want to clear that up, I work with racers
PS The above post of mine was meant to be a quote.
iceracercrx is offline  
Old 08-04-2007, 07:42 PM
  #40  
3.0 BAR
 
Racintweek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,877
Default Re: 35 vs 38 mm

Originally Posted by iceracercrx
the 3 mechanical engineers that i work with are laughing right now

The 3 mechanical engineers that you work with are circle jerky right now, HAHAHHA
JD and I will agree 1 out of 100 are good the other 99 suck each others ***** during lunch.
Originally Posted by iceracercrx
The differences between most engineers and racers is,
1.Racer will always finsh the build sooner
2. Racer will always spend less money
3. Racer will always win!!!


Randy > doens't work with any engineers, I just want to clear that up, I work with racers
PS The above post of mine was meant to be a quote.


why cant engineers be racers??

our intake manifold is on the fastest pump gas 05+ mustang (supercharged 26psi, prototype mani made 80Whp)
and we have and still are designing parts for big manufacturers

Alba racing
turner motorsports
kooks custom headers (engineers are so dumb we give advice to a company thats been around since before most of us were born)


Racintweek is offline  



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:39 PM.