35 vs 38 mm
07-29-2007, 02:17 AM
#4
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,401
Re: 35 vs 38 mm
you guys suck. he's only asking what the difference is. you dont have to be ********. the difference is 3MM 
, therefore the capacity is accelerated by the momentum of the overflowing combustable exhaust fumes that carry excess molecules of get a rope.
, therefore the capacity is accelerated by the momentum of the overflowing combustable exhaust fumes that carry excess molecules of get a rope.
07-29-2007, 06:54 PM
#6
1.5 BAR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 932
Re: 35 vs 38 mm
well since u guys are obviously retarded lol... i know size isnt ---- in comparison...
I meant about performance wise. about holding higher amounts of boost, what the limits of the 35 was, while still being reliable.
I meant about performance wise. about holding higher amounts of boost, what the limits of the 35 was, while still being reliable.
07-29-2007, 07:01 PM
#8
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,161
Re: 35 vs 38 mm
Originally Posted by samson
Same flange. I don't know the difference in performance or limits, buuuuuuut I'm going to go ahead and say that you'd be okay with either or them. 
JP
JP
This guy kinda already answered your question. Either will work, and if you plan on pushing THAT much pressure the 44mm is your solution. Otherwise either will suit your standard needs.
JP
