Forced Induction Custom FI Setup Questions

1976 280z

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-04-2003, 11:36 AM
  #11  
1.0 BAR
Thread Starter
 
crippledgiraffe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 384
Default Re:1976 280z

Sounds good, there is a 350 engine/tranny for sale in the paper, $550. I'll call on it today.

Now I can get those chrome valve covers i've always wanted!!! or not.
crippledgiraffe is offline  
Old 04-05-2003, 07:45 PM
  #12  
1.0 BAR
Thread Starter
 
crippledgiraffe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 384
Default Re:1976 280z

If I put in the carbureted sb Chevy 350 motor, would I be able to turbo it? Would it just be better to go NA with a high-flow carb and a Spiral Max...
crippledgiraffe is offline  
Old 04-05-2003, 08:01 PM
  #13  
1.0 BAR
 
2000psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 432
Default Re:1976 280z

anything more than a BPU 350 won't be very streetable, I mean twin turbo that 350 in the Z and you won't have traction in 4th gear
2000psi is offline  
Old 04-05-2003, 10:00 PM
  #14  
1.0 BAR
Thread Starter
 
crippledgiraffe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 384
Default Re:1976 280z

Sounds like a bet to me, buddy. Heading to Pick n Pull tommorow, hopefully punk some parts.
crippledgiraffe is offline  
Old 04-05-2003, 11:51 PM
  #15  
1.0 BAR
 
2000psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 432
Default Re:1976 280z

Is it just me or is stealing stuff from the salvage yards REALLY fun?
2000psi is offline  
Old 04-06-2003, 11:03 AM
  #16  
1.0 BAR
Thread Starter
 
crippledgiraffe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 384
Default Re:1976 280z

I prefer to think of it as giving the government some competition.
crippledgiraffe is offline  
Old 04-06-2003, 10:02 PM
  #17  
1.0 BAR
 
turbowagonman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 207
Default Re:1976 280z

I had a 78 280z with a turbo motor in it. was very fun to drive, and got better mileage than my non-turbo, and was very quick. I personally wouldn't do the smallblock thing. I would get an 81-83 turbo z motor and sit down in it. you can put 240 rods in the motor(100 thousands longer, raises compression one point), o-ring the block, and push around 4-500 hp on it. or you can just get the p90 head(turbo head) and put it on your 260 motor.(don't bother porting or polishing the p90 head, nissan spent $$ doing it already,you'll only make it worse). I have never heard of the turbo manifold not fitting the other motors. the 240-260-280 motor parts will pretty much all interchange. The factory downpipe will work, you'll just have to have a muffler shop fabricate a 3inch exhaust to run with it. I am building an 82 turbo motor right now to go in my 53 chevy 2dr hardtop. the v8 will kill your mileage, but the turbo six will be more fun and get great mpg.
turbowagonman is offline  
Old 04-07-2003, 01:23 PM
  #18  
1.0 BAR
Thread Starter
 
crippledgiraffe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 384
Default Re:1976 280z

So... small-block it is.
crippledgiraffe is offline  
Old 04-08-2003, 06:58 PM
  #19  
1.0 BAR
Thread Starter
 
crippledgiraffe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 384
Default Re:1976 280z

I can get a pretty good deal on a blown 350 motor. If I put a blown 350 in it, do you think the frame would hold up?

I also don't want to cut up my hood to have the Hillborn scoop go through it, but I will make that sacrifice if I don't have to do much frame work.
crippledgiraffe is offline  
Old 04-09-2003, 03:24 AM
  #20  
1.5 BAR
 
89dxhunchback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,115
Default Re:1976 280z

I'd say 87' Buick Grand National motor, but that's just me.. Seen the stock motor run 9.9s in a freaking regal, so imagine what it'd do in a 280...

PS: I'm putting a GN motor in a fox body stang...
89dxhunchback is offline  


Quick Reply: 1976 280z



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:56 AM.