1976 280z
#17
Re:1976 280z
I had a 78 280z with a turbo motor in it. was very fun to drive, and got better mileage than my non-turbo, and was very quick. I personally wouldn't do the smallblock thing. I would get an 81-83 turbo z motor and sit down in it. you can put 240 rods in the motor(100 thousands longer, raises compression one point), o-ring the block, and push around 4-500 hp on it. or you can just get the p90 head(turbo head) and put it on your 260 motor.(don't bother porting or polishing the p90 head, nissan spent $$ doing it already,you'll only make it worse). I have never heard of the turbo manifold not fitting the other motors. the 240-260-280 motor parts will pretty much all interchange. The factory downpipe will work, you'll just have to have a muffler shop fabricate a 3inch exhaust to run with it. I am building an 82 turbo motor right now to go in my 53 chevy 2dr hardtop. the v8 will kill your mileage, but the turbo six will be more fun and get great mpg.
#19
Re:1976 280z
I can get a pretty good deal on a blown 350 motor. If I put a blown 350 in it, do you think the frame would hold up?
I also don't want to cut up my hood to have the Hillborn scoop go through it, but I will make that sacrifice if I don't have to do much frame work.
I also don't want to cut up my hood to have the Hillborn scoop go through it, but I will make that sacrifice if I don't have to do much frame work.