pics for j davis, late night xmas
12-27-2005, 11:58 PM
#31
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 0
Re: pics for j davis, late night xmas
Originally Posted by GiNuWiNe
Please say your pulling my left ********, you can tell the pipe isn't aligned.
Look up a table of schedule pipe's ID/wall thickness/diameter, pay attention to straight sections vs various bends. I can guarantee the ID changes more than that pipe is "misaligned"
12-28-2005, 06:44 PM
#33
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 21,479
Re: pics for j davis, late night xmas
Bah, as much as I'd like to jump on the bandwagon, I'd have to say that manifold is just fine. If it were a $900 manifold made for a show car then I would say shove it up your ***, but it's far from that. It's a sub-$300 manifold that will most likely last forever and function just fine for any setup. 
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
12-28-2005, 10:46 PM
#34
0.5 BAR
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 184
Re: pics for j davis, late night xmas
Originally Posted by Joseph Davis
Yes, but is it aligned across the SSR, internally? Because ****** external alignment is purely cosmetic, and therefore worthless.
Look up a table of schedule pipe's ID/wall thickness/diameter, pay attention to straight sections vs various bends. I can guarantee the ID changes more than that pipe is "misaligned"
Look up a table of schedule pipe's ID/wall thickness/diameter, pay attention to straight sections vs various bends. I can guarantee the ID changes more than that pipe is "misaligned"
12-29-2005, 08:06 AM
#38
1.0 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 604
Re: pics for j davis, late night xmas
no JD actually pipe is rated off INNER diameter (nominal). i understand the clearance for pipe is pretty loose but its still rated to have the same ID throughout straight or bend because its primarily used to flow liquids so the ID is the important dimension. for example 304ss sched 10 1.5" pipe has a ID of 1.682 and a wall thickness of .109" in both straight and bent secitons.
http://www.mcmaster.com/library/20051004/45735K323L.GIF
http://www.mcmaster.com/library/20050809/4347K351L.GIF
and heres a table of shedule/wall thickness http://www.interpipe.com/Pipe_Dimens...nd_Weights.htm
http://www.mcmaster.com/library/20051004/45735K323L.GIF
http://www.mcmaster.com/library/20050809/4347K351L.GIF
and heres a table of shedule/wall thickness http://www.interpipe.com/Pipe_Dimens...nd_Weights.htm
12-29-2005, 08:59 AM
#39
1.0 BAR
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 599
Re: pics for j davis, late night xmas
Originally Posted by Dr.Boost
Bah, as much as I'd like to jump on the bandwagon, I'd have to say that manifold is just fine. If it were a $900 manifold made for a show car then I would say shove it up your ***, but it's far from that. It's a sub-$300 manifold that will most likely last forever and function just fine for any setup.
12-29-2005, 10:46 AM
#40
3.0 BAR
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,588
Re: pics for j davis, late night xmas
Originally Posted by Jcushing
no JD actually pipe is rated off INNER diameter (nominal).
Hell your last link demonstrates the flaw in your thought.
Originally Posted by Jcushing
and heres a table of shedule/wall thickness http://www.interpipe.com/Pipe_Dimens...nd_Weights.htm
