Fabrication Everything From JBwelded/Fluxcored downpipes to Equal length SS Manifolds.

aluminum exhaust system

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-09-2009, 09:55 PM
  #21  
0.5 BAR
 
AaronZ34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 166
Default

Originally Posted by signorelli21
Well holy ----, I cannot believe you are actually this serious about this, I guess its what I get for trying to be sarcastic on a forum now littered with people that don't know ----.

First of all, the original post asked if he should use Aluminum rather than steel so he can save weight,( actually he wanted to replace his perfectly fine stock exhaust for aluminum just to save weight) and then of course you and a bunch of other newbtastics came running saying OMG hell yea save teh weight!!!

so, lets analyse that.

16 guage Mild steel weighs around 2lbs per foot, whereas Aluminum weighs about .7lbs per foot, so if you have 10 ft of pipe you would save about 13 pounds using aluminum vs mild steel, then of course you have muffler/catalytic converter/resonator, clamps hangars and their respective bolts and gaskets and flanges, so yea you save some weight, big ------- deal. You could save more weight by removing your spare tire or running half a tank of gas, personally I am redoing all of my exhaust and charge piping with stainless due to its superior strength, etc.
And? Saving weight is worth it. Removing the spare tire has one really bad side affect. You don't have a spare tire. Same with running a half tank of gas. You only have half the gas. Saving weight in the exhaust system has NO side affects. You still have a full tank, and the stock reliability.

You're redoing your charge piping with steel, because of its strength? Is your charge piping a structural component of the car or what?

Well mainly because I was being sarcastic in hopes that he would get pissed and respond with funny insults about how stupid and gay my exhaust is, but also because it is, its 4 ft long and consists of a glasspack, flange and 3 ft or so of 16 guage mild steel pipe, so it probably weighs less than 30 lbs, what the ---- do you mean I don;t know how his is designed? he posted pictures of it, and all the rest of the crap your spewing is subjective nonsense, I made my exhaust in about an hour with a flux core welder and an angle grinder so i could finish boosting my car that day, is it the "right" way to have done it?

Yes, because I set an objective and created a pile of ---- that met that objective, being mature, saving weight or having money has nothing to do with it, you should get your car as fast as you can AND THEN worry about trying to cut weight anyway, dropping 30 lbs isn't going to do ---- and thats the whole ------- point sir.
Considering your charge piping is structural, I'm only left to assume your exhaust is too. I'm not sure about the HMT way to do it, but I'd ---- a dead horse before I flux core welded my frame components. And by the way, your exhaust also has a few undesirable side affects, that his aluminum version doesn't. First, it isn't legal on multiple counts. Second, it's loud as ----. Third, it's bad for the environment. And fourth, it adversely affects your car's handling for a few reasons.

Cutting weight is part of the design concept in getting my car as fast as I can, not an afterthought. That's the big difference between your build and mine, and why mine would absolutely destroy your's on any track. Oh, I passed a full emissions check not one month ago.
AaronZ34 is offline  
Old 05-09-2009, 10:05 PM
  #22  
0.5 BAR
 
AaronZ34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 166
Default

So the aluminum piping weighs 35% as much as steel. Your exhaust is about 4 feet. That means his can be almost 11 1/2 feet long, and weigh the same. Now since it's highly unlikely he needs that much pipe, he can substitute a cat converter and a muffler. His exhaust is better than your's is. It can be quieter, legal throughout, environmentally friendly, and have better affect on handling, if it's designed well.

There are reasons to use a steel exhaust, you just can't seem to think of them.
AaronZ34 is offline  
Old 05-09-2009, 11:41 PM
  #23  
1.5 BAR
 
signorelli21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 828
Default

Originally Posted by AaronZ34

You're redoing your charge piping with steel, because of its strength? Is your charge piping a structural component of the car or what?
No the charge piping is not structural obviously, however my exhaust manifold is and I don't have the equipment to weld aluminum so I'm going to use stainless for everything.

Originally Posted by AaronZ34
Considering your charge piping is structural, I'm only left to assume your exhaust is too. I'm not sure about the HMT way to do it, but I'd ---- a dead horse before I flux core welded my frame components. And by the way, your exhaust also has a few undesirable side affects, that his aluminum version doesn't. First, it isn't legal on multiple counts. Second, it's loud as ----. Third, it's bad for the environment. And fourth, it adversely affects your car's handling for a few reasons.
My charge piping isn't structural, in fact its currently held in place with mechanics wire and JB weld, who the ---- said anything about welding frame components? do you even actually work on your own ---- or what? the rest of that ---- i could care less about, I have two other cars and two bikes so this is far from being my daily driver, its just a project, and like i said I half assed everything so i could hurry up and get it done.


Running aluminum exhaust to save weight is still gay and I could give a ---- less about how great your car is, from the way you sound it was built by someone other than you and people that don't work on their own cars get zero respect from me.
signorelli21 is offline  
Old 05-10-2009, 12:26 AM
  #24  
0.5 BAR
 
AaronZ34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 166
Default

Originally Posted by signorelli21
No the charge piping is not structural obviously, however my exhaust manifold is and I don't have the equipment to weld aluminum so I'm going to use stainless for everything.
So if your charge piping isn't structural, then why are you using the steel piping for its strength like you said you were? Or were you full of ----, and you're really using it because you can't afford to do it right.

My charge piping isn't structural, in fact its currently held in place with mechanics wire and JB weld, who the ---- said anything about welding frame components? do you even actually work on your own ---- or what? the rest of that ---- i could care less about, I have two other cars and two bikes so this is far from being my daily driver, its just a project, and like i said I half assed everything so i could hurry up and get it done.
Well, you said youw ere using the steel for its strength, so I assumed it must be structural, like a frame component. Then you said you fluxxed it, and I wondered why you'd use such a halfass method of welding for something that's structural.

Running aluminum exhaust to save weight is still gay and I could give a ---- less about how great your car is, from the way you sound it was built by someone other than you and people that don't work on their own cars get zero respect from me.
It must be gay, I mean, what kind of dumbfuck would use aluminum when they could use steel? Those car builders that come themselves lotus sure are a bunch of retards, they could have used steel for the frame YAY.

Did you really just ask if I built my car? You did. Oh boy, it's time for me to have some fun.

Here's MY garage after I pulled the old engine out:



Here's the short block that I disassembled to port/polish the heads and upgrade the valvetrain:



Here's the long block that I reassembled:



Here it is after I put the Stage 3 Kevlar clutch, 8lb aluminum flywheel (Let me ------- guess, I should have used steel?), and the transmission together:



And here it is on the cradle that I modified, using the engine mounts that I built:



And here it is with the manifolds and valve covers that I put on, and the fuel rail that I modified:



Here it is as I put the engine in the car:



And the wiring harness that I made from scratch:



The fuel lines that I made:



The topside engine mount that I made:



And, as if you haven't been royally ------- owned by now, the headers. Let me guess, I paid someone to build these? Not quite. I built them. From a box of steel tubing. Tuned equal length primaries (1.75 X 20), formed 3-1 collectors, mandrel bent Y-pipe with dual 2.5 feeds, and the 38mm wastegate flange. All ceramic coated, inside and out, with stainless V-band flanges.







The custom intake adapter that I built:



The oil pan that I modified to add 1.5qts capacity:



And what it all looks like:



Now my current project. Mind you I did everything you see below, and will end up doing the rest as well:

The engine cradle that I highly modified, along with the engine mounts that I built:





The 8lb aluminum flywheel (Should I have used steel?):



The 32 valve, DOHC, 4.6l Northstar V8 that I rebuilt:







And the headers that I am building. As if my previous tuned equal length ones weren't good enough, I figured I'd step it up on this build. So we have long tube, tuned equal length, 180* crossover headers. Do you even know what the ---- that means?






So, I think I do a fair bit of work myself, what do you think?
AaronZ34 is offline  
Old 05-10-2009, 12:37 AM
  #25  
0.5 BAR
 
AaronZ34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 166
Default

I've got more. Another Fiero with a 3.4l DOHC swap that I did:





Another Fiero with a 3.4l DOHC swap that I did:





And my 55 Bel Air, that I've been doing a frame off resto on for the past 8-9 years or so. It's got a blown 406 cubic inch small block that I built.

/Engine2.jpg[/IMG]

AaronZ34 is offline  
Old 05-10-2009, 12:38 AM
  #26  
0.5 BAR
 
AaronZ34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 166
Default

Ready to shut the ---- up, or should I go on? Because I can.
AaronZ34 is offline  
Old 05-10-2009, 01:55 PM
  #27  
1.5 BAR
 
signorelli21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 828
Default

well so looks like I was wrong, your not completely worthless after all, although looks like you need to run a bit more heat or turn your wire speed down, doesn't look like your getting full penetration, its amazing that for such an advocate of aluminum and high end ---- you cheaped out and went with mild steel for all your manifolds, then had them ceramic coated.

Anyways I don't give a ---- if your a nascar crewchief thats been in the business for 30 years, it still doesn't make your original point anymore valid, so if the original poster wants to take off his stock exhaust and replace it wth aluminum thats great, and if he saves some weight in the process thats great too, and if he shaves a 1/10th or so off his 1/4 by doing so and is consistent enough to actually verify the results then thats ------- outstanding, but weather or not its worth all that effort is ultimately up to him, I say save your money and boost your ---- if you want to go faster.
signorelli21 is offline  
Old 05-10-2009, 02:07 PM
  #28  
0.5 BAR
 
AaronZ34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 166
Default

Originally Posted by signorelli21
well so looks like I was wrong, your not completely worthless after all, although looks like you need to run a bit more heat or turn your wire speed down, doesn't look like your getting full penetration, its amazing that for such an advocate of aluminum and high end ---- you cheaped out and went with mild steel for all your manifolds, then had them ceramic coated.
I am getting full penetration, that I can assure you. I used mild steel because my MIG is setup for mild, and I don't want to TIG the headers, because it's double the work with no benefits, when the coated mild steel will last just as long, and be just as durable. And it costs less, even coated. I spend the money where it's worth spending. That's why my turbocharger cost more than your car.

Anyways I don't give a ---- if your a nascar crewchief thats been in the business for 30 years, it still doesn't make your original point anymore valid, so if the original poster wants to take off his stock exhaust and replace it wth aluminum thats great, and if he saves some weight in the process thats great too, and if he shaves a 1/10th or so off his 1/4 by doing so and is consistent enough to actually verify the results then thats ------- outstanding, but weather or not its worth all that effort is ultimately up to him, I say save your money and boost your ---- if you want to go faster.
How are you going to sit here, and argue that steel is better? It's laughable really. It's like saying cast iron intake manifolds are better because if you slam a boulder on them they won't break. Well whoopty ------- doo.
AaronZ34 is offline  
Old 05-10-2009, 05:59 PM
  #29  
1.5 BAR
 
signorelli21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 828
Default

Originally Posted by AaronZ34
I am getting full penetration, that I can assure you. I used mild steel because my MIG is setup for mild, and I don't want to TIG the headers, because it's double the work with no benefits, when the coated mild steel will last just as long, and be just as durable. And it costs less, even coated. I spend the money where it's worth spending. That's why my turbocharger cost more than your car.
lol, your mig is setup for mild huh? well that explains alot. You know that you could have spent less money by using stainless and achieved the same thing, not to mention it will last longer and be less likely to crack. I paid 50 bux for my civic, hopefully your turbo is worth more than that, mine is.


Originally Posted by AaronZ34
How are you going to sit here, and argue that steel is better? It's laughable really. It's like saying cast iron intake manifolds are better because if you slam a boulder on them they won't break. Well whoopty ------- doo.
Well because you see, I am not a moron, and understand how various types of metal react to heat and vibration, and how in turn this can effect wave pressure in your exhaust and lots of other things that are explained in the two articles below.

here, read this, pay special attention to the chart at the bottom-
Stainless_article

then read this one-
Aluminum_article

Maybe then you can enlighten us with your vast knowledge.
signorelli21 is offline  
Old 05-10-2009, 06:26 PM
  #30  
0.5 BAR
 
AaronZ34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 166
Default

Originally Posted by signorelli21
lol, your mig is setup for mild huh? well that explains alot. You know that you could have spent less money by using stainless and achieved the same thing, not to mention it will last longer and be less likely to crack. I paid 50 bux for my civic, hopefully your turbo is worth more than that, mine is.
Not really. So I setup my MIG for stainless, now what about all my engine mounts? I don't want to use the stainless supplies to weld mild, and I don't want to have to switch back and forth all the time. Besides, I weld far more mild then I do SS. The entire exhaust system, including headers, hasn't had a failure yet, pushing 15,000 miles so far. And when I took it to the dyno, I had the headers, Y-pipe, turbo, and over a foot and a half of the downpipe glowing bright, held that way for almost a half hour. They aren't going to fail.

Let's look at the cost. My bends were $10 a piece, at Burns Stainless, the same bends are $45 a piece. I needed 20 of them. The piping alone would cost $700 more. Now add in welding materials for SS, figure $75. The SS head flanges would be $200, mine were $40. Finally, what about the mufflers? Have custom made SS mufflers? Spintech, the brand my muffler had to be, doesn't offer their's in SS. Custom muffler, sounds cheap to me! Muffler aside, I'm looking at $1175 in materials alone. In mild, I spent around $540, and that's with my entire exhaust system ceramic coated, inside and out. At half the price, I'll stick with mild.

Well because you see, I am not a moron, and understand how various types of metal react to heat and vibration, and how in turn this can effect wave pressure in your exhaust and lots of other things that are explained in the two articles below.

here, read this, pay special attention to the chart at the bottom-
Stainless_article

then read this one-
Aluminum_article

Maybe then you can enlighten us with your vast knowledge.
You sure talk like one. Before I go through the articles, be aware that they are put out by a company, meaning a place that profits, from selling stainless. You think they are going to say anything negative about their product? Now, onto their assumptions.

Originally Posted by Burn's Stainless
You've probably seen Indy cars with their enclosed engine compartments and thermal clam-shell enclosures around their turbocharger headers. They must thermally wrap their exhaust pipes just so the radiant heat off the tubes won't cause fires or melt any critical systems. In this case headers made out of mild steel would completely fail and break apart due to the severe heat retention, let alone scale and send death particles into the turbocharger, ruining the turbine blades. 321 stainless steel has excellent high temperature fatigue resistance in this enclosed application and does a darn good job of living in this hostile environment better than any other material except the ultra-high nickel content steels ( such an Inconel ), which are hard to find, very difficult to work with and extremely expensive.
My engine compartment is mostly enclosed, and gets really ------- hot. My headers/Y-pipe are completely wrapped, with only the downpipe exposed. My headers have not completely failed, have not broken apart, and have no sent death particles into my turbocharger. Good call Burns.

I'm not arguing whether SS is better, there is no argument, it is. But, what do the strengths matter, when I'm not exceeding them on either material? Again, it's like a cast iron intake manifold. That's ------- awesome it can stand an airplane rolling over it. When's the last time an airplane drove over your intake manifold? If you aren't exceeding the load limits, then why use a material that costs $500+ more? It'd be like using steel frames for airplanes. Yes now they are stronger! On a side note, the aluminum was plenty strong enough, and weighed 1/3 as much.

Originally Posted by Burn's
However, we would never recommend aluminum for exhaust systems!
This is a really blanket statement. I wouldn't either, on a car like mine, that glows the steel tubing quickly. But on a very low specific output Honda, with an oversized exhaust, and a lot of airflow through the exhaust, what's the problem with it? There are hundreds of thousands of people running around with aluminum exhausts. It is perfectly acceptable if the car isn't boosting hard, isn't making a whole lot of power, and has the support to cool the pipes (Airflow). Mine is boosting hard, has zero airflow around the exhaust, and is making a lot of power (For the size/displacement). That is why I'm not running an aluminum exhaust. Because I'm at the point where it would fail, I've exceeded its limitations. So I went up to the next suitable material, mild steel.

Last edited by AaronZ34; 05-10-2009 at 06:30 PM.
AaronZ34 is offline  


Quick Reply: aluminum exhaust system



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:28 AM.