03 r1 turbo project finnished
#7
its a rising rate fpr.theoreticaly it can give suitable fuel enrichment without the need for a pc3.but using both means some road testing can be done before the dyno...which is vital for a first turbo project as there is a lot of trial and error
#8
gotcha. i used a begi(fmu) on my second turbo bike build. for my third turbo bike build i use the stock fuel system and the pc3. got great results with 6 psi boost. 225hp and 125ft.lbs.
#9
thats cool. what bike was your 2nd build..
on the face of things my dyno results look ok but i was running 8 psi and needed water inj and -2 ignition to stop det ...the power off boost was crap aswel.
with my new setup i am hoping for about the same hp but at 5 psi and stock timing.
its all done up and running now so just waiting for some dry weather for a test ride then off to the dyno
on the face of things my dyno results look ok but i was running 8 psi and needed water inj and -2 ignition to stop det ...the power off boost was crap aswel.
with my new setup i am hoping for about the same hp but at 5 psi and stock timing.
its all done up and running now so just waiting for some dry weather for a test ride then off to the dyno
#10
both my builds were 02 gsxr 1000's. the fmu build was too much of a hassle and it affected reliability. the second gsxr build i didnt touch the stock fuel system and it made a big difference in power and reliability. ive never had an issue as long as i kept the boost at 6psi or below. any more than that will require upgraded engine internals, upgraded engine computer, upgraded fuel system and an intercooler/meth/water injection. you start to get into the higher priced components. 6psi or less is more than enough to scare the ---- out of you so thats all i build. i didnt do any major timing adjustments on my builds. it was all stock timing except at higher rpm range. i adjusted the timing to 1 degree retard just in case.