Engine Management eCtune , Crome , AFC , FMU , Zdyne , Hondata , EMS , TE , Uberdata Anything to control your fuel, spark needs!

uberdata vs. SAFC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-09-2004, 04:24 PM
  #1  
0.5 BAR
Thread Starter
 
crazy4nos25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 174
Default uberdata vs. SAFC

which one would you guys do. reliability, $$$, time consumption, user friendly....let me know which one is better for all of those things. oh yea and i want it a 10 psi. it would help alot thanks.
-Seth-
crazy4nos25 is offline  
Old 10-09-2004, 04:28 PM
  #2  
1.0 BAR
 
racerxfear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 273
Default Re:uberdata vs. SAFC

uberdata

its reliable as what the tuner knows, Its hella user friendly. With time consumption wasnt much. All needed to be done was buy the burner, solder and desolder, and program. Less than what you might think. And 10 psi is no problem with uberdata. If you want more that's where different bar map sensor comes into play.
racerxfear is offline  
Old 10-09-2004, 09:03 PM
  #3  
3.0 BAR
 
Donald125's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 6,279
Default Re:uberdata vs. SAFC


https://www.homemadeturbo.com/forum/...threadid=28007
Donald125 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
si 1
Wanted
2
05-26-2008 09:56 PM
jabbers
Wanted
4
01-09-2008 02:31 PM
ryan1
Wanted
0
01-26-2007 03:48 PM
fastnikes
Turbo Parts For Sale
7
10-21-2004 08:38 PM
playboyace35
Engine Management
4
07-18-2004 05:13 AM



Quick Reply: uberdata vs. SAFC



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:09 AM.