TurboEdit, 450cc injectors, stock PM6 map, 3bar Motorola MAP - doesn't work!
11-26-2008, 06:57 PM
#11
0.0 BAR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 20
Re: TurboEdit, 450cc injectors, stock PM6 map, 3bar Motorola MAP - doesn't work!
2xenocron> can you explain a little bit more, what to add and where...(procedure..)..sorry to bother, but I'm new to maps and chip tuning, so I would appriciate if you could explain what to do....thank you
P.S. Do you mean that I change the stock map from 240 to 450, and then to add a 0.6 in all the fuel map fields below 3200 rpms....or something else
?
P.S. Do you mean that I change the stock map from 240 to 450, and then to add a 0.6 in all the fuel map fields below 3200 rpms....or something else
?
11-28-2008, 07:16 PM
#13
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 0
Re: TurboEdit, 450cc injectors, stock PM6 map, 3bar Motorola MAP - doesn't work!
Originally Posted by txdohczc
he is saying change your injector size (in turboedit) to 450cc then use a stock map and use that as a starting point to tune from
12-02-2008, 01:52 PM
#14
0.0 BAR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 20
Re: TurboEdit, 450cc injectors, stock PM6 map, 3bar Motorola MAP - doesn't work!
2txdohczc>If I use a stock map, and then change injector sizing from 240 to 450, then I need to add a 0.6 value in every fuel map field below 3200 prm?....did you guys mean that?
Something like this maybe ? :
On first picture is a stock PM6 map
On second picture is map with changed injector sizing from 240 to 450 in Turboedit, everything else is as it were in stock one
Let's stop now on this.
Is that procedure and are these values correct?
If yes, what to do next?
Something like this maybe ? :
On first picture is a stock PM6 map
On second picture is map with changed injector sizing from 240 to 450 in Turboedit, everything else is as it were in stock one
Let's stop now on this.
Is that procedure and are these values correct?
If yes, what to do next?
12-02-2008, 01:54 PM
#15
0.0 BAR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 20
Re: TurboEdit, 450cc injectors, stock PM6 map, 3bar Motorola MAP - doesn't work!
Here is the picture after first step, stock PM6 with changed injector sizing from 240 to 450 ccm.
What to do next?
Should I add a 0,6 value in every fuel map field below 3200 rpm?
What to do next?
Should I add a 0,6 value in every fuel map field below 3200 rpm?
12-02-2008, 02:11 PM
#16
0.0 BAR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 20
Turboedit vs. Chrome, help
I kwon that Turboedit is for OBD0 and Chrome for OBD1 ECU's.
I need to ask you all one question, is there a significant difference in procedures etc. with tuning with turboedit and with Chrome? I'm asking this 'cause I 've got a friend that tuned his OBD1 d16 with Chrome pretty good, and I would like him to tune my OBD0 D16 with Turboedit when I'm done with my setup, but he has never tuned a car with Turboedit.
So, if you would be so kind and anwser me is tuning with Turboedit and with Chrome alike, and what to focus on, where are (if there are any) major differences, what to be careful about etc.
In short, major differences in tuning with those to programs and what to keep in mind.
Thanks
I need to ask you all one question, is there a significant difference in procedures etc. with tuning with turboedit and with Chrome? I'm asking this 'cause I 've got a friend that tuned his OBD1 d16 with Chrome pretty good, and I would like him to tune my OBD0 D16 with Turboedit when I'm done with my setup, but he has never tuned a car with Turboedit.
So, if you would be so kind and anwser me is tuning with Turboedit and with Chrome alike, and what to focus on, where are (if there are any) major differences, what to be careful about etc.
In short, major differences in tuning with those to programs and what to keep in mind.
Thanks
12-02-2008, 02:53 PM
#19
0.0 BAR
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 0
Re: Turboedit vs. Chrome, help
Originally Posted by #Leo#
Hmm, I don't know why are you saying that....I think that my 1990 D16Z2 OBD0 can be successfully tuned with Turboedit.
12-02-2008, 03:10 PM
#20
1.5 BAR
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,087
Re: Turboedit vs. Chrome, help
IM just saying iv been tuning my own car for a year now and ectune was the most strait forward program to use. IMO i have seen good things with turboedit also ive tried bre on obdo b16 NA it was nice. Im not trying to knock you setup or you wishes im just giving my $0.02 if i had to choose between turboedit and crome i would choose crome b/c its a newer program with more potential the turboedit.
