PLX M-300 or AEM UEGO?
06-04-2006, 01:10 PM
#12
0.0 BAR
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 0
Re: PLX M-300 or AEM UEGO?
Originally Posted by B18TurboEF
allows you to replicate a narrowband o2 sensor, helps for datalogging or running 1 o2 sensor
A linear WB output is more accurate when you are datalogging it and simple math = faster datalogging.
06-04-2006, 05:02 PM
#13
1.5 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,427
Re: PLX M-300 or AEM UEGO?
from my uego users manual i just got friday
The AEM default position is (P0). When set to (P0) (Figure 10A) the gauge displays AFR values. (P1) is the same as (P0) except that the gauge displays lambda values. These settings (P1 and P0) implement a linear calibration with the most useful voltage range possible (0-5V).
so right in the book it basicly says it has linear output... or did i read it wrong
The AEM default position is (P0). When set to (P0) (Figure 10A) the gauge displays AFR values. (P1) is the same as (P0) except that the gauge displays lambda values. These settings (P1 and P0) implement a linear calibration with the most useful voltage range possible (0-5V).
so right in the book it basicly says it has linear output... or did i read it wrong
06-07-2006, 10:53 AM
#16
1.5 BAR
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,427
Re: PLX M-300 or AEM UEGO?
Originally Posted by d112crzy
thats cuz no one is rich enough to get that wb. or atleast everyone chooses not to because it offers the same ---- as zt2 or the innovates, and those are cheaper.
thats news to me!it was only $265 from a sponsor on H-T
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
